--
Clara Kühn, Phd Candidate
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 341 - 9940 2271
Fax: +49 341 - 9940 2260
Web: www.cbs.mpg.de
E-Mail: cku...@cbs.mpg.de
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Candidate
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 341 - 9940 2271
Fax: +49 341 - 9940 2260
Web: www.cbs.mpg.de
E-Mail: cku...@cbs.mpg.de
27/2017 06:18 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer experts,
>
> in the longitudinal 2 stage model I find a difference in rate between my two
> groups in right intra parietal sulcus for surface area (survives MC
> correction). I would like to look at the cortical thickness in that
the ones I received in the cache.th30.abs.y.ocn.dat
file)
Could you please tell me if this is possible and how?
Thank you very much!
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Candidate
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
nybody have an idea what that
means and how it can be fixed?
How long is this step supposed to take? I have 81 subjects with 1 - 3 time
points.
Any help or suggestions would be much appreciated!
Cheers
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Candidate
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brai
ave 81 subjects with 1 - 3 time
points.
Any help or suggestions would be much appreciated!
Cheers
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Candidate
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 341 - 9940 2271
Fax:
ubject in the list
works fine...
I've also attached the input file.
What could be the problem and how can I fix it?
Cheers Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, G
list
works fine...
I've also attached the input file.
What could be the problem and how can I fix it?
Cheers Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 341 - 9940 22
with node at the
intervention time in LME (mixed effects).
Best, Martin
> On 21 Apr 2017, at 17:15, Clara Kühn <cku...@cbs.mpg.de> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear FreeSurfer experts,
>
> I have a longitudinal design with 3 groups and 3 time points. For one group
> the interventi
de at the
intervention time in LME (mixed effects).
Best, Martin
> On 21 Apr 2017, at 17:15, Clara Kühn <cku...@cbs.mpg.de> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear FreeSurfer experts,
>
> I have a longitudinal design with 3 groups and 3 time points. For one group
> the interventi
at the spc from tp2 to tp3?
Are there statistical reasons that forbid this procedure of comparing the
change across time between groups?
Thanks for your help!
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse
at the spc from tp2 to tp3?
Are there statistical reasons that forbid this procedure of comparing the
change across time between groups?
Thanks for your help!
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
smatch between X and C with same no of
columns
oh, I think I see the problem now. The input is surface-based data, but
you did not include a --surf subject hemi option, so it thinks that it
is a volume.
On 04/11/2017 12:58 PM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> attached you find the rman
between X and C with same no of
columns
sorry, that is the log file. What I want is the terminal output, ie, when you
run it, all the stuff that is printed to the screen.
On 4/11/17 5:07 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
Hi Doug
I am not conciously using a mask but I attached the glmfit.log
At the end it
you using a mask? Can you send the terminal
output from running mri_glmfit?
On 03/31/2017 03:29 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> ah, ok. I used the proper glmdir now with this command:
> mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir
> /data/p_npsy001_neurotrain/kids_data/sem_con-tp1and2/qdec/rmanova/
> --c
d2//qdec/rmanova
On 03/30/2017 01:12 PM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> I tried this command:
>
> mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir
> /data/p_npsy001_neurotrain/kids_data/sem_con-tp1and2//qdec/rmanova/C-pre-vs-post
> --cache-dir
> /data/p_npsy001_neurotrain/kids_data/sem_con-tp1and2//average/mult-
" <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
An: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. März 2017 18:57:36
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] glmfit mismatch between X and C with same no of
columns
what do you mean that it did not seem to work?
On 03/30/2017 11:25 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Than
columns
Since there are 40 subjects, you would only have 40+1 columns, not 80+1
On 03/29/2017 03:42 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> I've also attached the fsgd file for you. Yes, I have 40 subjects and a
> contrast column. I adapted this from this tutorial:
> https://su
ast matrix based on DODS and not
DOSS (see the web page on the rmanova about creating contrasts)
On 03/28/2017 03:50 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Sorry, I had a typo in the fsgd file. This is the correct command line and
> terminal output:
>
> mri_glmfit --glmdir $SUBJECTS_DIR/qdec/r
terminal output
On 03/27/2017 09:08 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer experts,
>
> I'm trying to run a repeated measures anova as described here:
> https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/RepeatedMeasuresAnova
>
> I have 40 subjects with 2 time points each, so it's qu
: "Douglas N Greve" <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
An: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Gesendet: Montag, 27. März 2017 19:49:04
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] glmfit mismatch between X and C with same no of
columns
Need command line and terminal output
On 03/27/2017 09:08 AM, Clara Kü
would be much appreciated, thank you!
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 341 - 9940 2271
Fax: +49 341 - 9940 2260
Web: www.cbs.mpg.de
E-Mail: cku...@cbs.mpg.de
l be the average value over the vertices in the ROI, which is
not what you want for surface area. Add --accumulate to the mri_segstats
command line to get the total area
On 02/21/2017 12:43 PM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> I have one last question about the whole thing.
>
> What is the measureme
-
Von: "Douglas N Greve" <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
An: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Februar 2017 18:23:48
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] cluster as ROI
then that is the "ocn" file to use with mri_segstats
On 02/21/2017 12:18 PM, Clara K
quot;ocn" file to use with mri_segstats
On 02/21/2017 12:18 PM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> yes!
>
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Douglas N Greve" <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> An: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Februar 2017 17:58:37
> Be
016.12.08-40kids-2stagemodel/rh-area_again//rh-Diff-1-3-Intercept-long.area-spc/cache.th30.abs.sig.ocn.mgh
On 02/21/2017 11:54 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> I've attached it for you as a .txt file
>
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Douglas N Greve" <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.
On 02/21/2017 11:44 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Hm. I already did that. In none of my glmdirs are files like the
> csdbase.sig.ocn.mgh. This is the mri_glmfit-sim that I ran:
>
> mri_glmfir-sim --glmdir $SUBJECTS_DIR/qdec/40kids-rh-area-spc --cache-dir
> $SUBJECTS_DIR/average/multi-
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: "Douglas N Greve" <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
An: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Februar 2017 17:24:02
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] cluster as ROI
You will have to run mri_glmfit-sim
On 02/21/2017 04:07 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
>
-
Von: "Douglas N Greve" <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
An: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2017 19:22:01
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] cluster as ROI
On 02/16/2017 04:24 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> thanks for your input. Could you specify
ter.
On 02/14/2017 11:47 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer Experts,
>
> I compared 2 groups in QDEC in spc (from pre to post) and found a cluster
> that survives Monte Carlo correction. Now I would like to extract the data
> for each participant and each time point from
but that didn't work (I
could draw only on the medial surface and around the temporal sulcus). I'm
guessing because I'm using a study specific template and not the fsaverage.
Any help is much appreciated!
Thank you
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
.abs.sig.cluster.mgh.stats
is not found or is too small to be a valid statsfile
Use --skip flag to automatically skip bad stats files
Do I have to define my cluster as a ROI and then warp it onto the single time
points? How would I do that?
Any help is much appreciated!
Thank you
Clara
--
Clara Kühn
is expecting v6 naming conventions
On 02/08/2017 11:38 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Thank you, I think it worked. I've attached the file again.
> There was one error message in the terminal output though:
>
> atlas_icv (eTIV) = 1287829 mm^3(det: 1.512705 )
> /nobackup/etsch2/kid
u need to supply the full path when
running it, like this
$SUBJECTS_DIR/mris_anatomical_stats-doug
On 02/08/2017 11:27 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> I'm so sorry, I don't know anything about programming...
> I downloaded it, copied it into my SUBJECTS_DIR as mris_anatomical_stats-doug
> and tri
u don't
confuse it with the v5.3 version
On 02/08/2017 10:53 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> thanks. What kind of format is it? How do I open it?
>
> Cheers
> Clara
>
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Douglas N Greve" <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> An: freesur
Try this version (same as version 6)
https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/safelinks/greve/mris_anatomical_stats
On 02/08/2017 04:55 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> thanks for your reply. I tried it out and attached the lh.aparc.pial.stats
> file for you to take a look at. As
h.aparc.annot -c
../label/aparc.annot.ctab subject lh pial
On 2/7/17 4:48 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer experts,
>
> I'm trying to extract a total Pial Surface Area like it is extracted for
> White Surface Area in the ?h.aparc.stats file. I have tried this command but
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I'm trying to extract a total Pial Surface Area like it is extracted for White
Surface Area in the ?h.aparc.stats file. I have tried this command but it
doesn't seem to include Pial Surface Area:
mris_anatomical_stats -a $SUBJECTS_DIR/ZF1K.base/label/lh.aparc.annot -f
clusters. Look in the sumfile for the cluster identity
On 02/01/2017 11:41 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer experts,
>
> I did a group analysis in QDEC for the symmetric percent change from pre to
> post and have a couple of clusters that don't survive the Monte Carlo
>
vertices to look at individual trends.
How could I achieve this?
Thank you for your help.
Clara
-
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 341 - 9940 2271
Fax: +49 341
w.cibersam.es/grupos/grupo-de-investigacion/ficha-personal?id=14486>
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Clara Kühn <cku...@cbs.mpg.de> wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer experts,
>
> is it possible to do a vertex-wise analysis on ROIs? When I extract the
> values per subject for (e.g.)
exactly the effects are.
I'd be really happy for any suggestions!
Thank you
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 341 - 9940 2271
Fax: +49 341 - 9940 2260
Web
I would like to show that the significant difference between two groups is
driven by a certain group and to do that I want to display the thickness and
area values of each cluster in bar graphs.
What could I do to receive these values?
Cheers, Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute
Hello Ben,
I am no expert, I can only talk from my experience.
I've had similar images in my data. Those might be blood vessels or dura that
were included in the surface. If they are included in the surface on more than
5 slices and pretty well visible you could delete those voxels from the
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: "Douglas Greve" <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
An: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. August 2016 15:57:25
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] REPOST: problem with Qdecrc file
Try long_mris_slopes
On 8/31/16 8:34 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
&
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I still don't seem to be able to choose spc and rate etc from the dropdown menu
in QDEC. Is there an option to perform the longitudinal 2 stage model in the
command line instead of QDEC?
Thank you!
Clara
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: "ckuehn"
Hi Martin,
I tried both. Neither of the options worked, though.
I have created a subdirectory SUBJECTS_DIR/qdec2stage/ where I have my dat
file, the .Qdecrc, the level files etc. But when I start qdec in that folder,
load the data table and prepare everything I still can't choose spc (for
be the
problem?
Thank you for your help!
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 341 - 9940 2271
Fax: +49 341 - 9940 2260
Web: www.cbs.mpg.de
E-Mail: cku...@cbs.mpg.de
be the
problem?
Thank you for your help!
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 341 - 9940 2271
Fax: +49 341 - 9940 2260
Web: www.cbs.mpg.de
E-Mail: cku...@cbs.mpg.de
for your help!
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 341 - 9940 2271
Fax: +49 341 - 9940 2260
Web: www.cbs.mpg.de
E-Mail: cku...@cbs.mpg.de
ard.edu
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juli 2016 23:46:20
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] DeMean Flag
The DeMeanFlag in what tool?
On 07/08/2016 05:16 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer experts,
>
> is there an explanation somewhere for the DeMeanFlag? I can't find it in the
> wiki but I would
please explain it on the example design matrix so I can adapt it to
mine?
Thank you!
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 341 - 9940 2271
Fax: +49 341
Dear Freesurfer experts,
is there an explanation somewhere for the DeMeanFlag? I can't find it in the
wiki but I would like to use it to demean my covariates for the GLM and LME.
Cheers
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department
quot; <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
An: "Freesurfer support list" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Gesendet: Montag, 4. Juli 2016 15:37:57
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] controlling for total gray matter volume
sounds right to me
Bruce
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Clara Kühn wrote:
> I have
unds right to me
Bruce
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Clara Kühn wrote:
> I have decided now to not control for ICV or total gray matter volume when
> looking at cotrical thickness but to control for total gray matter volume
> when looking at surface area. Does that sound about right?
>
I have decided now to not control for ICV or total gray matter volume when
looking at cotrical thickness but to control for total gray matter volume when
looking at surface area. Does that sound about right?
Cheers, Clara
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: "Arkadiy Maksimovskiy"
was wondering if it is useful to control for total gray matter volume
when looking at surface area?
Thanks for your help!
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I would like to look at longitudinal thickness data and want to control for
total gray matter volume. Should I use that information from the CROSS before
anything has been registered and smoothed or from the LONG after they have been
registered to the BASE?
Also I was
variable (in my case whole brain
cortical thickness/surface area)?
Thank you!
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 341 - 9940 2271
Fax: +49 341 - 9940 2260
variable (in my case whole brain
cortical thickness/surface area)?
Thank you!
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 341 - 9940 2271
Fax: +49 341 - 9940 2260
Web
n our worked-out examples?
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsgdExamples
On 05/31/2016 03:39 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer experts,
>
> I would like to correlate my thickness data with behavioral measures. Can I
> do that with glmfit? If so, could you explain
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I would like to correlate my thickness data with behavioral measures. Can I do
that with glmfit? If so, could you explain how to specify the contrast for that?
My fsgd file looks like this:
GroupDescriptorFile 1
Class 1male plus blue
Class 1female plus red
Class
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I would like to correlate my thickness data with behavioral measures. Can I do
that with glmfit? If so, could you explain how to specify the contrast for that?
My fsgd file looks like this:
GroupDescriptorFile 1
Class 1male plus blue
Class 1female plus red
Class 2male
8:39
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] glmdir question
Try this version
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/mri_glmfit-sim
On 05/26/2016 12:53 PM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> I ran this command with the --no-y Flag:
>
> mri_glmfit-sim --glmd
table. The rows of the table are each
subject. The columns are the clusters. Each cell is the mean of the
input for that subject over that cluster. It needs the input data to do
this.
On 05/26/2016 11:18 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> I thought it had to be there because when I don't copy it into the glmdi
eates the glmdir). In any
case, you can run it with --no-y and it will not look for the input file
(and will not compute means over the clusters).
On 5/26/16 8:56 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer Experts,
>
> when running the Monte Carlo correction on a GLM I specify this
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 341 - 9940 2271
Fax: +49 341 - 9940 2260
Web: www.cbs.mpg.de
E-Mail: cku...@cbs.mpg.de
ack of the order of the subjects as
specified in the --f or --fsgd options
On 04/14/2016 12:08 PM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> thanks for your reply.
>
> I have two further questions on that matter:
>
> 1. I opened the stacked file (lh.thickness_sm10.mgh) in matlab but
me thing. If you stack the
lh.thickness.fwhm10.87kids_template.mgh together into one file you
should get the same thing as the output of mris_preproc. With
mris_preproc, you have to keep track of the order of the subjects as
specified in the --f or --fsgd options
On 04/14/2016 12:08 PM, Clara
Hi Martin,
thanks for your reply.
I have two further questions on that matter:
1. I opened the stacked file (lh.thickness_sm10.mgh) in matlab but there is no
column for subject-id or anything to give me a hint which line is which
subject. Is there a way to find that out? Is it in the same
han that, there are not good
guidelines.
On 4/13/16 8:36 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> thanks for your reply. It made things a lot clearer. I totally understand
> that you're probably receiving more than one cry for help per day.
>
> What would you say are the co
rows."
I have looked at mri_glmfit-sim --help but there seems to be no flag for fwhm
only an overwriting one.
Should I register and smooth the data again for the separate time points or is
there another way to deal with that?
What could I do to correct my glm data?
Cheers, Clara
--
Clara Küh
-
Von: "Douglas N Greve" <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
An: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 00:15:41
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] REPOST: Monte Carlo correction in QDEC
sorry, I could have sworn that I answered this one
On 04/12/2016 08:57 AM, Clara Kü
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
for the analysis in QDEC I created my own Monte Carlo correction.
My questions relate to the threshold option.
1. Would I use neg if I have mostly blue clusters in the QDEC display and pos
if I have mostly red clusters?
2. When do I use abs?
3. I compared the neg
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
for the analysis in QDEC I created my own Monte Carlo correction.
My questions relate to the threshold option.
1. Would I use neg if I have mostly blue clusters in the QDEC display and pos
if I have mostly red clusters?
2. When do I use abs?
3. I compared the neg
REPOST: QDEC analysis
Hi Clara,
I think the message is correct and Qdec can only do 2 levels. Qdec is
rather limited. You need to use mri_glmfit for that.
Best, Martin
On 04/08/2016 08:14 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer experts,
>
> I am trying to analyze some single time poi
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I am trying to analyze some single time points of my longitudinal data in QDEC.
I have 3 groups and created a file for the discrete factor "group" with three
levels (1,2 and 3). I have done the same for gender (with 2 levels). The
analysis with gender works just fine
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I am trying to analyze some single time points of my longitudinal data in QDEC.
I have 3 groups and created a file for the discrete factor "group" with three
levels (1,2 and 3). I have done the same for gender (with 2 levels). The
analysis with gender works just fine
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I am trying to analyze some single time points of my longitudinal data in QDEC.
I have 3 groups and created a file for the discrete factor "group" with three
levels (1,2 and 3). I have done the same for gender (with 2 levels). The
analysis with gender works just fine
s not perform any fitting.
Best, Martin
On 03/24/2016 12:44 PM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Thank you, Martin! That clears things up a lot!
>
> Could you explain what the difference is between the commands
> long_mris_slopes and mris_preproc? As far as I understand they give you a
> di
, Martin
On 03/23/2016 12:28 PM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer experts,
>
> I would like to analyze my longitudinal data also cross-sectionally at single
> time points. I am a little confused as to how to register my data to the
> template and smooth it accordingly.
>
>
dec/cross.qdec.table.dat
(5) recon-all -s name -qcache -target name_of_template
(6) mris_preproc --fsgd gender_age.fsgd --cache-in thickness.fwhm10.fsaverage
--target fsaverage --hemi lh --out lh.gender_age.thickness.10.mgh
Please help clear up my confusion :)
Thanks in advance,
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Stud
Hi Kaspar,
I had the same problem. The last version that supports matlabpool is Matlab
8.2. Maybe try it with that version.
Cheers, Clara
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: "Kasper Jessen"
An: "Freesurfer support list"
Gesendet: Mittwoch,
sample
You can just store it in a different directory, then use the --cache-dir
option when running mri_glmfit-sim to specify the new folder, eg, if you
use --o /path/to/myspace/yoursubject/lh/cortex, then specify
/path/to/myspace
On 03/15/2016 12:36 PM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I have a question regarding the Monte Carlo correction.
To create a Monte Carlo correction for my specific sample (4year old kids) the
wiki suggests this command:
mri_mcsim --o $FREESURFER_HOME/average/mult-comp-cor/yoursubject/lh/cortex
--base mc-z --surface
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I hava a question regarding rerunning the recon-process. I have cases where I
do manual edits on a brain and only set a few control points on one hemisphere
but white matter edits on the other. I would then run the -cp flag for one
hemisphere and the -wm flag for the
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I hava a question regarding rerunning the recon-process. I have cases where I
do manual edits on a brain and only set a few control points on one hemisphere
but white matter edits on the other. I would then run the -cp flag for one
hemisphere and the -wm flag for the
con-all -long-qcache -target
I don't know why you are getting an error with the other hemisphere.
Maybe you use a different template for qcache and then fsaverage later?
Best, Martin
On 12/11/2015 11:36 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Hi Freesurfer experts,
>
> I eventually used the
d for example create a qdec table with the first row fsid
timepoint1.long.base
for each subject and then use qdec.
If you want to make use of the improved data from the longitudinal image
processing, you need to specify the *.long.base directories, so that
data is taken from there.
Good luck
12/08/2015 04:24 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer experts,
>
> I have a subsample of my longitudinal data with 3 scans per subjects fully
> preprocessed and would like to start with some simple correlations of
> thickness at time 1 with behavioral measures and other facto
the Base, right?
So, I would like to know how I can analyzse a single time point within my
longitudinal design.
Cheers,
Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49
said volumetric data. Is there an extra turorial or walkthrough for that?
Cheers, Clara
--
Clara Kühn, Phd Student
Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science
Department of Neuropsychology
Stephanstrasse 1A
04103 Leipzig, Germany
Phone: +49 341 - 9940 2271
Fax: +49 341 - 9940 2260
Web: w
; <rpw...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
An: "Freesurfer support list" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. November 2015 18:03:52
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer crash upon wm.mgz changes
Try 6.0.0beta.
On 11/03/2015 12:02 PM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Our IT gu
uopeng: any other ideas?
Bruce
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015, Clara Kühn wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I attached the wm.mgz from one of my participants. It happens with any
participant though.
What I did is add wm voxels ( 147, 106, 68 ) and klick the save button and then
it crashes with afore mentione
eff: Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer crash upon wm.mgz changes
Try 6.0.0beta.
On 11/03/2015 12:02 PM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Our IT guy said it could be a software problem since he didn't have the
> problem and the only difference between out computers was the display.
> We have these versions at
by Segmentation Violation and how I can fix it??
Cheers and thanks in advance!
Clara Kühn
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only
--qdec-long long.qdec.table.dat
and send me the result?
On 08/13/2015 01:01 PM, Clara Kühn wrote:
do you mean the one without the blank line at the end? I've attached that for
you.
Cheers, Clara
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
An: freesurfer
qdec file
Can you send the new qdec table file?
On 08/05/2015 04:05 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
no worries!
sadly, though, deleting the empty line wasn't the answer to the problem :(
Cheers, Clara
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
An: freesurfer
qdec file
oops, sorry for the delay, thanks for the reminder. The problem is that
you have a blank line at the end of your long.qdec.table.dat file.
Remove the line and see if it works.
doug
On 08/04/2015 12:42 PM, Clara Kühn wrote:
Hi Doug,
did the fordoug.log file give any information about
?
On 8/3/15 10:38 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
the command line is this:
mris_preproc --qdec-long /scr/etsch2/kids/ct/qdec/long.qdec.table.dat --target
7kids_template_sc1 --hemi lh --meas thickness --out
/scr/etsch2/kids/ct/qdec/lh.thickness.mgh
the terminal output is this:
nsubjects = 22
ERROR: cannot
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo