Hi Zeki
I'm using OSX 10.7.5. And, yes I have installed XQuartz as instructed by
the freesurfer installation website.
Thanks!
Joon
--
Joonkoo Park, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Associate
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience
Duke University
http://www.joonkoo.org/
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Z K
Hello,
I've used FreeSurfer previously on a linux machine (from a previous lab).
Now, I have just installed it on a Mac OSX, using the
freesurfer-Darwin-lion-stable-pub-v5.3.0.dmg version. I followed all the
instructions on the installation page. However, there were segfault errors
when running
Hi FreeSurfers,
I'm running a group-level analysis of the fMRI data (beta-maps of individual
subjects normalized onto fsaverage). One example would be like:
mri_glmfit --y grouprfx/lh.con_0001.norm.mgh --surf fsaverage lh \
--glmdir grouprfx/lh.con_0001.osgm --osgm
I understand that
Dear FreeSurfers,
I have a set of vertices in the fsaverage surface space that I want to
convert (or remap) to each subject's native surface space. What's the
easiest way to do this? I thought of mri_label2label, and this will involve
making label files. Are there any easier methods, either using
? Will having
two images give me substantial improvement in parcellation and
segmentation qualities? I am trying to gauge how important it is to have two
scans of high-res images.
Thank you!
Joon
--
Joonkoo Park
Ph.D. Candidate, Cognition Cognitive Neuroscience
Department of Psychology, University
Dear freesurfers,
How is spatial smoothing performed during a conventional fmri processing
stream?
I used SPM to (1) run the 1st level analysis on each subject, (2)
transformed the resulting volumetric statistical parametric map to the
surface space, (3) normalized each individual's surface map
Dear FreeSurfers
Is there a published reference to the clusterwise correction approach
implemented in FreeSurfer (
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/GroupAnalysis#ClusterwiseCorrectionforMultipleComparisons)?
I'd like to cite it for those readers and reviewers who aren't
this
mean that aseg.mgz is not used in subsequent processing stream? What shall I
do if I (after visually inspecting this) want to correct the surfaces more
similar to the results given be aseg.mgz?
Thanks for your help in advance.
Joon
--
Joonkoo Park
Ph.D. Candidate, Cognition Cognitive
the right dimensions, add
--noreshape.
doug
Joonkoo Park wrote:
Dear Surfers,
I (successfully) resampled a functional data on the surface map using
mri_vol2surf:
mri_vol2surf --mov func.nii --reg register.dat --projfrac 0.5 --interp
nearest --hemi lh --o lh.func.mgh
Then, I normalized
Dear FreeSurfers,
I got an error during Fix Topology step (seems like from the right
hemisphere) in the recon-all process (see below for more information).
I searched the ListServ and learned from other email threads that this
may be due to incorrect segmentation of WM or Cerebellum, or possibly
concerned about many options above)?
2. If so, why is the resulting dimension different from the other one?
I assume that it's probably a reshape issue, but how I can reshape the
dimension to match 163842 x 1 x 1?
Thanks in advance.
Joon
--
Joonkoo Park
Ph.D. Candidate, Cognition Cognitive
searched through the archive and the documentations but wasn't
satisfactory.
Thanks in advance!
Joon
--
Joonkoo Park
Ph.D. Candidate, Cognition Cognitive Neuroscience
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer
12 matches
Mail list logo