Re: [Freesurfer] Segfault errors in tkmedit and tksurfer

2014-06-12 Thread Joonkoo Park, Ph.D.
Hi Zeki I'm using OSX 10.7.5. And, yes I have installed XQuartz as instructed by the freesurfer installation website. Thanks! Joon -- Joonkoo Park, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Associate Center for Cognitive Neuroscience Duke University http://www.joonkoo.org/ On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Z K

[Freesurfer] Segfault errors in tkmedit and tksurfer

2014-06-11 Thread Joonkoo Park, Ph.D.
Hello, I've used FreeSurfer previously on a linux machine (from a previous lab). Now, I have just installed it on a Mac OSX, using the freesurfer-Darwin-lion-stable-pub-v5.3.0.dmg version. I followed all the instructions on the installation page. However, there were segfault errors when running

[Freesurfer] very high/low values in the mri_glmfit results

2011-02-18 Thread Joonkoo Park
Hi FreeSurfers, I'm running a group-level analysis of the fMRI data (beta-maps of individual subjects normalized onto fsaverage). One example would be like: mri_glmfit --y grouprfx/lh.con_0001.norm.mgh --surf fsaverage lh \ --glmdir grouprfx/lh.con_0001.osgm --osgm I understand that

[Freesurfer] converting a vertex (or a set of vertices) from one space to another

2011-02-17 Thread Joonkoo Park
Dear FreeSurfers, I have a set of vertices in the fsaverage surface space that I want to convert (or remap) to each subject's native surface space. What's the easiest way to do this? I thought of mri_label2label, and this will involve making label files. Are there any easier methods, either using

[Freesurfer] Two images vs. one image for recon-all?

2010-12-08 Thread Joonkoo Park
? Will having two images give me substantial improvement in parcellation and segmentation qualities? I am trying to gauge how important it is to have two scans of high-res images. Thank you! Joon -- Joonkoo Park Ph.D. Candidate, Cognition Cognitive Neuroscience Department of Psychology, University

[Freesurfer] Spatial Smoothing in the processing stream for fMRI-freesurfer integration

2010-07-16 Thread Joonkoo Park
Dear freesurfers, How is spatial smoothing performed during a conventional fmri processing stream? I used SPM to (1) run the 1st level analysis on each subject, (2) transformed the resulting volumetric statistical parametric map to the surface space, (3) normalized each individual's surface map

[Freesurfer] references to clusterwise correction for multiple comparisons

2010-06-28 Thread Joonkoo Park
Dear FreeSurfers Is there a published reference to the clusterwise correction approach implemented in FreeSurfer ( http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/GroupAnalysis#ClusterwiseCorrectionforMultipleComparisons)? I'd like to cite it for those readers and reviewers who aren't

[Freesurfer] inconsistencies in surface segmentation and aseg.mgz

2010-02-27 Thread Joonkoo Park
this mean that aseg.mgz is not used in subsequent processing stream? What shall I do if I (after visually inspecting this) want to correct the surfaces more similar to the results given be aseg.mgz? Thanks for your help in advance. Joon -- Joonkoo Park Ph.D. Candidate, Cognition Cognitive

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_vol2surf resulting in different dimensions for two different images in the same space

2010-02-22 Thread Joonkoo Park
the right dimensions, add --noreshape. doug Joonkoo Park wrote: Dear Surfers, I (successfully) resampled a functional data on the surface map using mri_vol2surf: mri_vol2surf --mov func.nii --reg register.dat --projfrac 0.5 --interp nearest --hemi lh --o lh.func.mgh Then, I normalized

[Freesurfer] Error during Fix Topology

2010-02-22 Thread Joonkoo Park
Dear FreeSurfers, I got an error during Fix Topology step (seems like from the right hemisphere) in the recon-all process (see below for more information). I searched the ListServ and learned from other email threads that this may be due to incorrect segmentation of WM or Cerebellum, or possibly

[Freesurfer] mri_vol2surf resulting in different dimensions for two different images in the same space

2010-02-18 Thread Joonkoo Park
concerned about many options above)? 2. If so, why is the resulting dimension different from the other one? I assume that it's probably a reshape issue, but how I can reshape the dimension to match 163842 x 1 x 1? Thanks in advance. Joon -- Joonkoo Park Ph.D. Candidate, Cognition Cognitive

[Freesurfer] Surface-based inter-subject registration of both anatomical and functional images

2010-02-15 Thread Joonkoo Park
searched through the archive and the documentations but wasn't satisfactory. Thanks in advance! Joon -- Joonkoo Park Ph.D. Candidate, Cognition Cognitive Neuroscience Department of Psychology, University of Michigan ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer