Re: [Freesurfer] Problem with intensity normalization control points

2021-10-18 Thread Douglas N. Greve
*Sent:* Friday, October 8, 2021 9:43 AM *To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Problem with intensity normalization control points The wm.mgz is expected since we added denoising to it; but it does not matter because wm.mgz is essentially a binary mask of WM

Re: [Freesurfer] Problem with intensity normalization control points

2021-10-08 Thread Staci A Board
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Douglas N. Greve Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 9:43 AM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Problem with intensity normalization control points The wm.mgz is expected since we added denoising

Re: [Freesurfer] Problem with intensity normalization control points

2021-10-08 Thread Douglas N. Greve
The wm.mgz is expected since we added denoising to it; but it does not matter because wm.mgz is essentially a binary mask of WM. The brainmask.mgz is created from T1.mgz. The T1.mgz will be affected by control points, but only if you run it from the beginning. The surfaces are placed on

[Freesurfer] Problem with intensity normalization control points

2021-09-30 Thread Staci A Board
External Email - Use Caution Hello, our lab has been using freesurfer for years, dating back to version 4.3 and recently ran into a problem with a new installation of 7.2. After adding control points in the typical fashion and saving them into the subject’s tmp folder as

Re: [Freesurfer] problem with intensity normalization control points

2009-09-08 Thread Nick Schmansky
Ritobrato, The control points mark voxels as belonging to white matter, and should be marked sparingly. They are not points on a spline, as it appears you were trying to do in the image. Nick On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 13:39 -0400, Bruce Fischl wrote: Hi Ri, you have to be careful to only put

Re: [Freesurfer] problem with intensity normalization control points

2009-09-08 Thread Ritobrato Datta
Datta rida...@mail.med.upenn.edu, freesurfer freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 1:45:04 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] problem with intensity normalization control points Ritobrato, The control points mark voxels as belonging to white matter

Re: [Freesurfer] problem with intensity normalization control points

2009-09-08 Thread Nick Schmansky
Eastern Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] problem with intensity normalization control points Ritobrato, The control points mark voxels as belonging to white matter, and should be marked sparingly. They are not points on a spline, as it appears you were trying to do in the image. Nick On Tue

Re: [Freesurfer] problem with intensity normalization control points

2009-09-08 Thread Bruce Fischl
: [Freesurfer] problem with intensity normalization control points Ritobrato, The control points mark voxels as belonging to white matter, and should be marked sparingly. They are not points on a spline, as it appears you were trying to do in the image. Nick On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 13:39

Re: [Freesurfer] problem with intensity normalization control points

2009-09-08 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Ri, you have to be careful to only put the control points in voxels that are completely white matter (no partial voluming). I also don't know what you mean by the control points didnt get converted to a continuous line. Can you elaborate? cheers, Bruce On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Ritobrato Datta