[Freesurfer] negative SUVr using PETsurfer

2019-12-02 Thread miracle ozzoude
External Email - Use Caution Hello Experts, I ran the PETsurfer pipeline using AV45 pet and performed pvc using pons as reference point. When i looked at the gtm.stats.dat file for one of my subjects, the SUVr for right and left nucleus-accumbens areas were in the negative (left =

Re: [Freesurfer] negative SUVr using PETsurfer

2019-12-02 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
It may or may not be something that needs to be fixed. The PVC is just a linear model where the regression coefficients are the uptake in each ROI. As with any model, it adjusts the regression coefs to minimize the error in the fit. If some end up being less than zero when you really expect all

Re: [Freesurfer] negative SUVr using PETsurfer

2019-12-03 Thread miracle ozzoude
External Email - Use Caution Thanks Doug. we double checked the registration with gtm.seg.mgz and it looks good. Also the uptake in Acc is not much smaller than other regions and is pretty similar on both hemispheres so we are not sure what could be causing this. Any suggestions mu

Re: [Freesurfer] negative SUVr using PETsurfer

2019-12-05 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Yea, not sure. It could be that the uptake in WM near the NAcc is somewhat less than average (GTM assumes constant throughout). If so, then the GTM would subtract too much from the NAcc in an attempt to remove the spill in from WM. This is more of a problem for amyoild and tau ligands because t