I think there's been some discussion around using fdmdv2 to pass digital
data (not voice). Could someone point me in the right direction or some
past discussions? Thanks!
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Window
> "RS" == Richard Shaw writes:
RS> because of the out-source-build you can create as many directories
RS> as you want
Just as a side note, that it not an advantage of cmake.
Cmake got the idea from autotools.
-JimC
--
James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
-
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Yes, I found that if I tried a static build that I needed alsa and ao
> libraries, so you'll probably need alsa-devel (or alsa-libs-devel?) and
> libao-devel. I'll think about ways to make the error more descriptive. I
> already had the packages installed
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Curt, WE7U wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > Yes, but I think it's the option you already discovered, USE_STATIC_SOX,
> so
> > something like:
> >
> > $ cmake -DUSE_STATIC_SOX=TRUE /path/to/src
> >
> > It will download the latest version (at
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Yes, but I think it's the option you already discovered, USE_STATIC_SOX, so
> something like:
>
> $ cmake -DUSE_STATIC_SOX=TRUE /path/to/src
>
> It will download the latest version (at least at the time I set it up, I
> don't think there's been a release
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Curt, WE7U wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Richard Shaw wrote:> As far as sox, that's why I did
> a static build for freedv. That way you
> > don't have to worry about it messing up other repository packages or
> having
> > to rebuild the EL packages against the new
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:31 PM, David Rowe wrote:
>
> > Is it because:
> > - People are comfortable with autotool and don't understand cmake?
> > - The cmake build doesn't work as well as the autotools build? (I've
> > fixed everything that I've gotten test reports for, which have been
> > few)
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Richard Shaw wrote:
> While I am both a Fedora packager and the author of the cmake config, I'm
> not really a programmer so I'll have to leave the source tweaking to
> others. :)
I'm both, but it doesn't mean I want to get my hands dirty in the source code
for yet another p
> Is it because:
> - People are comfortable with autotool and don't understand cmake?
> - The cmake build doesn't work as well as the autotools build? (I've
> fixed everything that I've gotten test reports for, which have been
> few)
> - Some other reason I haven't described here?
>From my side i
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Curt, WE7U wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > Ok, I'm assuming you installed yourself then. In that case, yes, I think
> > you need a newer version of sox. Unless you just want to build yourself I
> > have provided a EL repository[1] on freedv
Revised procedure:
Trying cmake on another OS. Managed to make it this far. Please no lectures
about "root", I'm a SysAdmin and understand the consequences. This is a test
VM I had available, and it has no user accounts (and I didn't feel like
making any for this simple test). ;-)
yum i
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Curt, WE7U wrote:
> I'll tweak my last message about the CentOS-6.4 build to include the sox
> build in case other people are searching for the info in the near future.
Additional stuff I had to do:
yum install xorg-x11-xauth
yum install xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi xorg
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Ok, I'm assuming you installed yourself then. In that case, yes, I think
> you need a newer version of sox. Unless you just want to build yourself I
> have provided a EL repository[1] on freedv.org which has all the
> dependencies properly packaged includ
We're going to make sure we're not breaking the codec, rather than just
making small deltas in arithmetic. But we really do need to cut the entire
project over to cmake and stop using autotools. The autotools files never
were very good at supporting additional development - they're a nightmare
to u
Press-on - Delete the old and press on with the new.
Ignore the galley, who will never step onto the playground anyway.
On 6/11/13, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
>>
>> However, I do not see a reason to remove the autotools build system
>> for codec2,
Now that I think about it, even if you want to build things yourself,
you're probably better off using my source RPMS which are available in the
repo.
Richard
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Window
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Curt, WE7U wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > cmake 2.8 is not available on CentOS 6, you need to install the Fedora
> EPEL
> > repositories if you haven't already and install cmake28, everything else
> is
> > the same except the binary has al
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> > The first one shows side by side comparison, the second graph is the
> 'diff"
> > I believe.
>
> On my system, there is no reported difference between hts1a cmake vs
> autotools.
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
