Duncan Webb wrote:
> May not make a difference, haven't too many small images to check
> against. All I have noticed is that nobody else has said that the images
> library was slow. The speed difference is a factor of between 5 and 10
> times faster, so I was assuming that it had something to do wi
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 22:12 +0100, Duncan Webb wrote:
>> This last change has made a huge difference loading the web library
>> image pages when the images are large; 7.2 mega pixel cameras generate
>> jpegs at about 3 MB, so I guess that not having to read the image in to
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 22:12 +0100, Duncan Webb wrote:
> This last change has made a huge difference loading the web library
> image pages when the images are large; 7.2 mega pixel cameras generate
> jpegs at about 3 MB, so I guess that not having to read the image in to
> determine the size has mad
Duncan Webb wrote:
> Chandan Pitta wrote:
> One thing that is puzzling me is why is it slow, any idea.
What is slow? I lost the context here. Do you mean the "freevo cache"
or the webpage loading or something else?
>>> The webserver loading pages is very slow.
>>>
>>> I think we need
Chandan Pitta wrote:
>>
>> > 3. Images files in cache have double extensions, like my_image.png.png
>> > and in some extreme cases like for gif files there are 3 extensions,
>> > like my_image.gif.gif.jpg. So I made some changes so that the cached
>> > image filename will be exactly the same as the
> 3. Images files in cache have double extensions, like my_image.png.png
> and in some extreme cases like for gif files there are 3 extensions,
> like my_image.gif.gif.jpg. So I made some changes so that the cached
> image filename will be exactly the same as the original image except
> for the c
Chandan Pitta wrote:
>> A bit more work than I expected to update the cache so that it works in
>> the same way as normal cache. Especially, as I hadn't committed Wout's
>> patch until too late, meaning that I had to apply the patch by hand.
>>
>> Let's hope that I didn't break anything else in the
A bit more work than I expected to update the cache so that it works in
the same way as normal cache. Especially, as I hadn't committed Wout's
patch until too late, meaning that I had to apply the patch by hand.
Let's hope that I didn't break anything else in the process. Quite a few
files change
Chandan Pitta wrote:
> On 1/8/07, Duncan Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Chandan Pitta wrote:
>> > On 1/7/07, Duncan Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Chandan Pitta wrote:
>> >>> On 1/5/07, Duncan Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Chandan Pitta wrote:
>> > What happened to the imag
On 1/8/07, Duncan Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chandan Pitta wrote:
> On 1/7/07, Duncan Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Chandan Pitta wrote:
>>> On 1/5/07, Duncan Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chandan Pitta wrote:
> What happened to the images? The pop-up window shows only scaled
Chandan Pitta wrote:
> On 1/7/07, Duncan Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Chandan Pitta wrote:
>>> On 1/5/07, Duncan Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chandan Pitta wrote:
> What happened to the images? The pop-up window shows only scaled
> image. I see that the javascript for openfoto
On 1/7/07, Duncan Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chandan Pitta wrote:
> > On 1/5/07, Duncan Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Chandan Pitta wrote:
> >>> What happened to the images? The pop-up window shows only scaled
> >>> image. I see that the javascript for openfoto has changed and is
> >>
Chandan Pitta wrote:
> On 1/5/07, Duncan Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Chandan Pitta wrote:
>>> What happened to the images? The pop-up window shows only scaled
>>> image. I see that the javascript for openfoto has changed and is
>>> causing the browser to scale the image. Can someone take a l
Chandan Pitta wrote:
> On 1/5/07, Duncan Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Chandan Pitta wrote:
>>> What happened to the images? The pop-up window shows only scaled
>>> image. I see that the javascript for openfoto has changed and is
>>> causing the browser to scale the image. Can someone take a l
On 1/5/07, Duncan Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chandan Pitta wrote:
> > What happened to the images? The pop-up window shows only scaled
> > image. I see that the javascript for openfoto has changed and is
> > causing the browser to scale the image. Can someone take a look at it.
> > Is it par
Chandan Pitta wrote:
> What happened to the images? The pop-up window shows only scaled
> image. I see that the javascript for openfoto has changed and is
> causing the browser to scale the image. Can someone take a look at it.
> Is it part of a larger fix that is coming later?
I had to commit Wou
What happened to the images? The pop-up window shows only scaled
image. I see that the javascript for openfoto has changed and is
causing the browser to scale the image. Can someone take a look at it.
Is it part of a larger fix that is coming later?
Regards,
Chandan
--
17 matches
Mail list logo
