On Wednesday 08 September 2004 14:54, Rob Shortt wrote:
> Apache+PHP == bloat. We used to use apache, now we have an extremely
> lightweight webserver that is part of Freevo. It goes along the same
> lines as why we don't use MySQL.
OK. Fine with me, IMO implementing a web-frontend in python shou
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Hans Meine wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 September 2004 12:56, Florian Demmer wrote:
> > just a thought: if there were a way to access the smbus system using
> > php, apache/php could simplifly creation of a stable and fast web part
> > of freevo...
I'd suggest something lightweigh
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 12:56, Florian Demmer wrote:
> just a thought: if there were a way to access the smbus system using
> php, apache/php could simplifly creation of a stable and fast web part
> of freevo...
There are many pro's and con's of an integrated webserver vs. a separate one.
Florian Demmer wrote:
just a thought: if there were a way to access the smbus system using
php, apache/php could simplifly creation of a stable and fast web part
of freevo...
Apache+PHP == bloat. We used to use apache, now we have an extremely
lightweight webserver that is part of Freevo. It goe
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 20:51:46 -0400, Michael Ruelle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dischi,
>
> The only reservation i have is leaving a stable webserver.
[...]
just a thought: if there were a way to access the smbus system using
php, apache/php could simplifly creation of a stable and fast web par
Dischi,
The only reservation i have is leaving a stable webserver. We use a few
features of twisted which are nice. Rewrite all images and styles
references to the first level so we don't have to have image and styles
dirs at every level, the cgi path way of sending variables in one
special case w
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 18:19, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some already know because I told it on IRC, but here the official
> "request for discussion":
>
> I don't like twisted. Why? It's a huge monster, including not only
> stuff we need like xmlrpc and a web server but also stuff we don't
> need
Dirk Meyer wrote:
I don't like twisted. Why? It's a huge monster, including not only
stuff we need like xmlrpc and a web server but also stuff we don't
need and a main loop that is too complex. I saw in the code that it
waits for dead children not started by any part of twisted .. Hey,
that are my
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 01:19, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some already know because I told it on IRC, but here the official
> "request for discussion":
>
> I don't like twisted. Why? It's a huge monster, including not only
> stuff we need like xmlrpc and a web server but also stuff we don't
> need
Hi,
some already know because I told it on IRC, but here the official
"request for discussion":
I don't like twisted. Why? It's a huge monster, including not only
stuff we need like xmlrpc and a web server but also stuff we don't
need and a main loop that is too complex. I saw in the code that it
10 matches
Mail list logo