Victoria's posting misses a primary consideration regarding life (us
and all other) and time,
which we rarely consider.We are all resonant beings, from micro to
macro scale.
We are entrained and tuned at the atomic, molecular, cellular and
greater, to
the many radiative wavelengths and
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 10:18:26AM -0800, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
On a tangent, however, I found this article interesting:
Citizens Against Peer Review
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2010/12/03/citizens-against-peer-review/
But it does bring up the point that we
Please look at http://www.intechopen.com/ --Mikhail
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Thank you Mikhail,
Delightful to find such a gold mine!
Vladimyr
Vladimyr Ivan Burachynsky
Ph.D.(Civil Eng.), M.Sc.(Mech.Eng.), M.Sc.(Biology)
120-1053 Beaverhill Blvd.
Winnipeg, Manitoba
CANADA R2J 3R2
(204) 2548321 Phone/Fax
vbur...@shaw.ca
-Original Message-
From:
Here is a report from someone on another list to
which I forwarded Nick's original usb microscope
question; the list had been kicking it around for
a while, and this guy took action.
===begin===
http://www.celestron.com/c3/product.php?ProdID=516
These are pretty good photos! How easy is it to
My pleasure, Vladimyr. --Mikhail
-Original Message-
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Vladimyr Ivan Burachynsky
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 7:11 PM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Read,
Russell,
Money for doing peer reviews!? Oh, gosh. If the world were thus!
Nick
-Original Message-
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Russell Standish
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 3:31 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied
I am told that in economics these days, some journals
do pay referees (which I presume means peer reviewers)
an honorarium that diminishes by some set amount every
day from the receipt of the paper (not dipping below $0,
though; that *would* get my attention).
This might be an Academic Urban
But would referees need some incentive to do a good job of reviewing a paper?
If we only go by economic motivation, and if our pay goes down the longer we
take, why not do a rush job? If reviewers are paid, shouldn't their work be
evaluated? Perhaps it is. Editors make note of who does a good
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 07:24:43PM -0500, lrudo...@meganet.net wrote:
The stills are JPEGs, the videos
are 3gp (whatever that is, but miraculously both my linux
boxes could display it, so kudos to Celestron for choosing
that format).
3gp is a low-res MPEG4 format used by 3G phones for
DId you come to my talk today? The piece I posted was one of the
papers I read for the talk. It does not represent the totality of my
thinking on this subject. You are absolutely right, there are a
variety of rhythms and systems of entrainment and response that we
simultaneously inhabit.
Sure you weren't huffing them?
I hear that slows things down as well...
Try placing the slide on a cold plate to slow things down. We used to use
that trick for insect macrophotography.
Shssh don't tell anyone how we cheated all those years. Sometimes a little
spray can of volatiles works to
VLC (Video For Linux) is actually the preferred multimedia Linux player. I
don't think you can huff it, though.
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Russell Standish r.stand...@unsw.edu.auwrote:
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 07:24:43PM -0500, lrudo...@meganet.net wrote:
The stills are JPEGs, the videos
13 matches
Mail list logo
