Russell Standish wrote circa 10-12-04 02:31 PM:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 10:18:26AM -0800, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
to change, etc. So, they really do have to commit to work like this.
No scientist will do peer review for the sake of paying bills.
Sorry, that was not my implication. I
: Monday, December 06, 2010 12:49 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Peer review
Russell Standish wrote circa 10-12-04 02:31 PM:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 10:18:26AM -0800, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
to change, etc. So, they really do have to commit to work
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:48:54AM -0800, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
Russell Standish wrote circa 10-12-04 02:31 PM:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 10:18:26AM -0800, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
to change, etc. So, they really do have to commit to work like this.
No scientist will do peer
Russell Standish wrote circa 10-12-06 02:03 PM:
What you write is a good description of how it ought to be. Sadly, it
is not a description of how it is.
Hm. I can accept that your experiences make you think that. My
experiences make me think the opposite. Most of the scientists I know
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:27:19PM -0800, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
And when I see review comments to papers I'm a co-author on, they
usually contain constructive feedback. I do often have to sift through
prejudiced tangents or twist my mind to see their point of view in order
to get to the
Of Russell Standish
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 4:49 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Peer review
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:27:19PM -0800, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
And when I see review comments to papers I'm a co-author on, they
usually contain
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 10:18:26AM -0800, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
On a tangent, however, I found this article interesting:
Citizens Against Peer Review
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2010/12/03/citizens-against-peer-review/
But it does bring up the point that we
Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: [FRIAM] Peer review
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 10:18:26AM -0800, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
On a tangent, however, I found this article interesting:
Citizens Against Peer Review
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2010/12/03/citizens-aga
inst-peer-review
[mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Russell Standish
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 3:31 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: [FRIAM] Peer review
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 10:18:26AM -0800, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
On a tangent, however, I found
:07 PM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Peer review
I am told that in economics these days, some journals
do pay referees (which I presume means peer reviewers)
an honorarium that diminishes by some set amount every
day from the receipt of the paper
Mr. Rodriguez:
I would like to talk to you about another idea related to the prediction
market tools. Might there be a best time and number to give you a call?
All the best,
Tom Johnson
Santa Fe
On 1/6/07, Marko A. Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone.
I thought people on this
11 matches
Mail list logo
