First, thanks for your informative response, I learn a lot
from it and other messages you posted before. I want
to know if you can put "appropriate portion" of your mail
into comments of source code, to document the limitation
of current code, so people who stumble into source code
can get
> Well, with '$tryRecompileArguments := true' all files should
> compile, but compilation may be quite slow
Yes, a few domains that set $tryRecompileArguments to nil is
extremely slow when compiling.
> But if you want to compile
> file containing multiple constructors than adding
>
oldk1331 wrote:
>
> This is an interesting bug.
>
> Minimal example to recreate this bug:
> (1) -> u := sqrt(2*tan(x))
> (2) -> f := atan(u+1+sqrt(1+(u+1)^2))-atan(u-1+sqrt(1+(u-1)^2))
> (3) -> normalize f
> ---
> --- a long expression is printed for debug purpose
>
On 05/30/2016 04:25 PM, Bill Page wrote:
> On 30 May 2016 at 10:19, oldk1331 wrote:
>>
>> BTW, the lack of documentation/comments and the quality of
>> existing documentation/comments is driving me crazy, I plan
>> to add some for future developers to see. Any idea/comment
>>
On 30 May 2016 at 10:19, oldk1331 wrote:
>
> BTW, the lack of documentation/comments and the quality of
> existing documentation/comments is driving me crazy, I plan
> to add some for future developers to see. Any idea/comment
> on which style of documentation is good for our
This is an interesting bug.
Minimal example to recreate this bug:
(1) -> u := sqrt(2*tan(x))
┌───┐
(1) \│2tan(x)
Type:
Expression(Integer)
(2) -> f := atan(u+1+sqrt(1+(u+1)^2))-atan(u-1+sqrt(1+(u-1)^2))
(2)
> Our solvers transform
> system of equations into triangular form. If system is zero
> dimensional (has finite number of solutions) than current
> method works OK. We have problem in case of higher dimensional
> solution set.
I noticed that too, 'triangularSystems' uses 'groebSolve'
> But like I said before, I breqn hangs on "integrate(sqrt(x^2+1)/(x^4+1), x)".
Yes, the problem is that breqn does not work well with TeX.
Attached is the version that my tex.spad produces. That compiles fine
with breqn (no hang), but also no break. :-(
The last two entries are numerator and
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> On 05/26/2016 02:44 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> > oldk1331 wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm not sure if this patch creates unnecessary parenthesis elsewhere.
> >>
> >> One change I noticed is "unparse(( t-1 )::INFORM)", it used to be
> >> "t+-1", after patch it's "t+(-1)", is it a
FYI, add "\\Large" after "\\begin{preview}" to make math font bigger.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
I wrote one for you. Apply the following patch and it should be ok.
But like I said before, I breqn hangs on "integrate(sqrt(x^2+1)/(x^4+1),
x)".
"(x+y+z)^10" works fine for me.
--- fricas.el
+++ fricas.el
@@ -165,4 +165,5 @@
(defvar fricas-TeX-preamble (concat "\\documentclass{article}"
For what it's worth, the function "imaxima-latex" produces a LaTeX-typeset
output (using breqn) of a Maxima command . As my knowledge of lisp and
elisp is minimal, I don't know if this could be re-jigged to work for
efricas.
To see the function, you can go to
On 05/30/2016 10:18 AM, oldk1331 wrote:
> Fricas doesn't need to compute the width of boxes as exactly as tex,
> just enough to know where to break an expression.
> Let a program (I'm talking about you, TeX) that knows nothing about
> math but only deals with strings to determine where to break a
I'm glad that now I have keep up with the whole discussion.
> I don't think that this is the task of FriCAS. Where would you break a
> TeX-Equation?
Where would breqn or other systems break a (no tex here) equation?
texbreak can break axiom's subset tex equation,
breqn can break latex
On 05/30/2016 08:29 AM, oldk1331 wrote:
> > I don't understand. I do not see a "fricas native breaking domains".
>
> What I meant is that I remember Waldek said he wanted such
> domains as a solution.
I don't think that this is the task of FriCAS. Where would you break a
TeX-Equation? The only
> I don't understand. I do not see a "fricas native breaking domains".
What I meant is that I remember Waldek said he wanted such
domains as a solution.
So, the reason your latex output mode is not commited is that
texbreak is used on wiki and we won't break it?
Summing-up:
1. tex + texbreak.
16 matches
Mail list logo