On 05/30/2016 10:18 AM, oldk1331 wrote: > Fricas doesn't need to compute the width of boxes as exactly as tex, > just enough to know where to break an expression. > Let a program (I'm talking about you, TeX) that knows nothing about > math but only deals with strings to determine where to break a math > expression, that is not the right thing.
Yes, you are right. But I am relatively happy with what my tex.spad or mathjax.spad + jupyter gives me, so I have no "itch" at the moment. If I need some tex output for a paper, that is enough. For everyday working, I find my 1d output much more useful since I can cut&paste the output or (especially) parts of it back into fricas. If we had a better 2d cut&paste mechanism, I would probably change my opinion. Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
