Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread Shawn Merdinger
Hi Michael, On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:40 PM, wrote: >... not everyone is in jail for a heinous crime like that... The smartjailmail.com site has at-the-moment only the Martin County Jail, and you can see who's there and their charge with the search below.There's certainly a few scary types w

Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread Justin Scott
> That's what snail mail is for... Postal mail is actually the number one entry point for contraband according to many of the jails we've spoken with. They're hoping that with increased use of electronic messaging the volume of postal mail will go down and they will be better able to screen the p

Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread michael.blanchard
n Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:59 PM To: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu Cc: funsec@linuxbox.org Subject: Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right) That's what snail mail is for, visitation days. Poor kids yes, but ultimately maybe they learn not to be like mom, or dad who'

Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread Justin Scott
> Nice to see this option for incarcerated people and their > families, though at 50 cents per email it's a bit costly imho. Frankly, I'm inclined to agree and have mentioned that on several occasions to the powers that be. They're fairly confident that it's the right price point though. > 1. I

Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread michael.blanchard
sec-boun...@linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org] On Behalf Of valdis.kletni...@vt.edu Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:39 PM To: Brance Amussen Cc: funsec@linuxbox.org Subject: Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right) On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:31:49 EST, Brance Amussen said: >

Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread Justin Scott
> Well, now I'll have no problem with going to jail. I > mean the only thing keeping me from going was lack of > internet access!!! Even with this system in place I wouldn't want to spend any more than a couple of hours in that place. Just being there for the short time I visited to meet with som

Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread Brance Amussen
ay, December 01, 2010 1:35 PM To: Brance Amussen Cc: funsec@linuxbox.org Subject: Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right) On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:59:29 EST, Brance Amussen said: > That's what snail mail is for, visitation days. Poor kids yes, but > ultimately maybe they learn

Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread Shawn Merdinger
Hi Justin, On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Justin Scott wrote: > If anyone has suggestions on improving the invitation process or > anything else I'm all ears. Nice to see this option for incarcerated people and their families, though at 50 cents per email it's a bit costly imho. 1. I've noti

Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:59:29 EST, Brance Amussen said: > That's what snail mail is for, visitation days. Poor kids yes, but > ultimately maybe they learn not to be like mom, or dad who's in jail. Actually, the evidence is pretty high that the kids from families where a parent is in jail have a *hi

Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread Justin Scott
> I bet its a challenge to market to prison populations > as well as jails. Most of the jails they have approached like the idea but are waiting to see how the first deployment goes. If they can get the inmates and families to use the private electronic messaging system then it should cut back on

Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread Brance Amussen
dis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:39 PM To: Brance Amussen Cc: funsec@linuxbox.org Subject: Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right) On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:31:49 EST, Brance Amussen said: > Seriously, you're in jail! Why the hell

Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread michael.blanchard
- From: funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org] On Behalf Of Brance Amussen Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:32 AM To: funsec@linuxbox.org Subject: Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right) Well, now I'll have no problem with going to jail. I mean the only thing k

Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:31:49 EST, Brance Amussen said: > Seriously, you're in jail! Why the hell do you get the privilege of > anything. When my parents grounded me, I couldn't do anything, that was the > punishment. I wouldn't have learned a lesson if I was grounded, and could > still play on the

Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread Dave Dennis
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Justin Scott wrote: > You may recall several months ago there was a discussion regarding > "invitations" from a member of a website/service sent by the service on > behalf of one of its users. A lot of debate ensued and I tried to determine > how best to approach it given a si

Re: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread Brance Amussen
er 01, 2010 11:15 AM To: funsec@linuxbox.org Subject: [funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right) You may recall several months ago there was a discussion regarding "invitations" from a member of a website/service sent by the service on behalf of one of its users. A lot of debate e

[funsec] Inmate E-Mail (someone guessed right)

2010-12-01 Thread Justin Scott
You may recall several months ago there was a discussion regarding "invitations" from a member of a website/service sent by the service on behalf of one of its users. A lot of debate ensued and I tried to determine how best to approach it given a situation where it was the only viable option given