The two essential features of the capitalist system (Was Re: torn: Reply to Ed Wieck)

1999-12-13 Thread john courtneidge
-- >From: Ed Goertzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: re: torn: Reply to Ed Wieck >Date: Mon, Dec 6, 1999, 7:35 pm > >From: "Ed Weick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Subject: Re: torn >Date: Sun

Re: torn: Reply to Ed Wieck

1999-12-10 Thread Ed Weick
>From: "Cordell, Arthur: #ECOM - COMÉ"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>It seems that the Czechs in 1968 tried to bring in Socialism with a human >>face. How about Capitalism with a human face? >> >>arthur cordell >> -- >Not possible ! >Hugs >j Perhaps just "Humanity with a

Re: torn: Reply to Ed Wieck

1999-12-10 Thread john courtneidge
-- >From: "Cordell, Arthur: #ECOM - COMÉ"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >It seems that the Czechs in 1968 tried to bring in Socialism with a human >face. How about Capitalism with a human face? > >arthur cordell > -- Not possible ! Hugs j

Re: torn: Reply to Ed Wieck

1999-12-10 Thread "Cordell, Arthur: #ECOM - COMÉ"
It seems that the Czechs in 1968 tried to bring in Socialism with a human face. How about Capitalism with a human face? arthur cordell -- From: Ed Weick To: Bruce Leier; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ed Goertzen Subject: Re: torn: Reply to Ed Wieck Date: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 7:50PM >

Re: torn: Reply to Ed Wieck

1999-12-09 Thread Bruce Leier
Responses in the original - Original Message - From: "Ed Weick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Bruce Leier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ed Goertzen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 6:50 PM Subject: Re

Re: torn: Reply to Ed Wieck

1999-12-08 Thread Ed Weick
>Ed, > >Couldn't disagree more. Capitalism is the issue. >Reform only strengthens the beast. I'm not going >to trash the local McDs, but I'm also not going to >condemn the tactic. What is this about going >after a label? I and many of us are opposing the >acts and the system -that you do not w

Re: torn: Reply to Ed Wieck

1999-12-08 Thread Ed Weick
>Come on Ed, > >Jews = Capitalists? I am well able to >differentiate between "capital" and "capitalism". >It does not sound as if you can. It is not >capital that causes people to suffer. But >capitalism does punish people and tells them they >should like it. And capitalists do profit from >t

Re: torn: Reply to Ed Wieck

1999-12-07 Thread Bruce Leier
Weick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ed Goertzen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 5:15 PM Subject: Re: torn: Reply to Ed Wieck > Ed, > > The posting you comment on seems to have been misunderstood by a lot of > people.

Re: torn: Reply to Ed Wieck

1999-12-07 Thread Ed Weick
Ed, The posting you comment on seems to have been misunderstood by a lot of people. It was intended as irony and as a demonstration of how laying the blame for a wide range of woes and human failings on a single group or class can lead to absurd and dangerous conclusions. My point is that the w

re: torn: Reply to Ed Wieck

1999-12-07 Thread Ed Goertzen
From: "Ed Weick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Subject: Re: torn Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 08:06:05 -0500 Part of Ed's post begs a reply. To obtain clarity, can we agree that capital as a stored value is a good thing. That Capitalizm, the monetary manipulation (percursor to individual