Den ons 20 maj 2020 03:22Thomas Adam skrev:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 03:20:06PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > Hi everyone.
> >
> > Just emailing to check that everyone's OK and not suffering too much at
> the
> > moment. I know different countries are largely doing the same things as
> one
> >
2018-03-03 7:03 GMT+10:30 Thomas Adam :
> However, we're not out of the woods yet, as there's the following
> complications:
>
> * Copyright 1996, Romano Giannetti.
> * Romano Giannetti - Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione
> *via Diotisalvi, 2 PISA
> * mailto:rom.
2018-02-13 0:44 GMT+10:30 Thomas Adam :
> If no one objects, I'll go ahead an start making the relevant changes?
I say go ahead. Good that the email found its way to him in the end.
//Viktor
2016-10-23 17:05 GMT+02:00 Dominik Vogt :
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 04:39:53PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
>> Den 23 okt. 2016 14:36 skrev "Dominik Vogt" :
>> > void fev_sanitise_configure_request(XConfigureRequestEvent *cr)
>> > {
>>
Den 23 okt. 2016 14:36 skrev "Dominik Vogt" :
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:56:31PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 23:29 (+0100), Thomas Adam wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:26:50PM -0300, zli...@ns.sympatico.ca
wrote:
> > >> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 15
Den 22 okt. 2016 19:36 skrev "Dominik Vogt" :
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 06:19:46PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 03:42:13PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > Proof reading this patch would also be helpful.
> >
> > I've taken a look. It's fine. I can't say I like the void
Den 18 okt. 2016 7:23 PM skrev "Dominik Vogt" :
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 06:29:59AM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> > Den 17 okt. 2016 11:56 PM skrev "Dominik Vogt" :
> > >
> > > Does anybody really use libstroke support?
> >
> &g
Den 17 okt. 2016 11:56 PM skrev "Dominik Vogt" :
>
> Does anybody really use libstroke support?
I've been using it in my configs since I started using fvwm.
> It's resonsible for
> quite some hardly readably code, and I suspect nobody uses it
> anymore. If there's a need for mouse gesture or tou
2016-05-19 17:18 GMT+02:00 Thomas Adam :
> As I understand it, FVWM was written with extensibility in mind, and hence
> could be extended through the use of modules. Although the core of FVWM is
> quite a bit larger now (read: some of the things ther could be modules, but
> hey-ho, one for another
2012/9/17 Tom Horsley :
> I found a thread in the archives from back in 2009 saying
> this issue was fixed:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/fvwm-workers@fvwm.org/msg01957.html
>
> Yet in fedora 17, GIMP sets WM_NAME and _NET_WM_NAME to
> utterly different strings, and I'm getting the (useless)
> WM
2011/4/18 Thomas Adam :
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:09:14PM +, Wei-Lun Chao wrote:
>> Still not accepted in fvwm 2.6.x
>>
>> > here are .po files of the locale
>> > zh_TW (Traditional Chinese)
>> > for fvwm 2.5.12
>
> Can you provide more context, please? I have no idea what you're
2011/4/15 Thomas Adam :
> Otherwise, that's it, guys. 2.6.0 is *out*. :)
Great work for pulling this together Thomas.
/Viktor
2011/3/9 Thomas Adam :
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 07:27:31PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Last year I was unsuccessful in applying for the GSoC deadline. This year,
>> I might improve upon that, assuming there's interest from folks here.
>
> The deadline for submissions is Friday 11th
2011/3/1 Dominik Vogt :
> I can vaguely remember that the existing code was meant to
> suppress some windows that would pop up and down in an infinite
> loop, but I can't recall the details.
If I remember correctly the existing code is a result of trying to get
something that works both with QT ap
2010/3/7 Thomas Adam :
> The poignant things any prospective mentors are going to need to know
> [3] are covered in question 2 -- which I am happy to fill out, but note
> that this won't and cannot get off the ground without a *backup* mentor.
> That's critical, and one of the failings from last ye
2009/6/23 Thomas Adam :
> This isn't a bug in FVWM, and I would imagine awesome have commited
> the sin of assuming all bugs in applications are circumventable in a
> window manager.
>
> The XMMS1 folks didn't like this approach by us, and Audacious clearly
> won't either. ;)
>
Of course, this "b
2010/1/2 Thomas Adam :
> All,
>
> Are there any outstanding bug-fixes which haven't yet been looked into, but
> were at one point reported to this list?
One thing that I've been thinking about is the fact the fvwm makes
EWMH toolbars sticky. I started a while ago to create a specific style
command
2010/1/13 Jason L Tibbitts III :
> /usr/bin/ld: i386 architecture of input file `libyywrap.o' is incompatible
> with i386:x86-64 output
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[4]: *** [FvwmScript] Error 1
Try to do "make clean" in your source tree. It seems to me as if you
have switched arch
2010/1/7 Thomas Adam :
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 11:25:29AM -0500, des...@verizon.net wrote:
>> I don't think using CWD is part of documented behavior...
>
> Hmm -- Do What I Mean (DWIM) approach here. It doesn't say it isn't part of
> documented behaviour either. :P
>
>> Making CWD the new defau
2010/1/2 :
> des...@verizon.net writes:
>
> I bring up a menu, pin it with button 2 on the title bar, then
> click on a pixmap on the title bar with an X.
When I was trying to reproduce this I ran int another bug:
When invoking a menu with the mouse over the title and clicking with
button 2 on t
2010/1/2 Paul Vojta :
> However, if xsltproc is to be required for building fvwm, I don't see where
> this is documented. It's not mentioned on the otherwise excellent web page
> http://www.fvwm.org/documentation/dev_cvs.php , and ./configure doesn't
> print a warning when it finds that xsltproc i
I'm looking for a way to ensure that no window has focus under certain
conditions for a module I'm working on, and I've figured that there is
no good way to forcefully move the focus to the nofocus window. It is
possible by something like "Current WindowStyle NeverFocus", but then
the module would
2009/8/28 Jesús Guerrero :
> On Fri, August 28, 2009 09:52, Viktor Griph wrote:
>> 2009/8/28 Jesús Guerrero :
>>
>>> News,
>>>
>>>
>>> I compiled fvwm-2.5.27, restarted, and it works without a hitch.
>>> So, it seems that, whatever th
2009/8/28 Jesús Guerrero :
> News,
>
> I compiled fvwm-2.5.27, restarted, and it works without a hitch.
> So, it seems that, whatever the problem is (and I am not saying
> it's in fvwm), it only happens with the current cvs.
>
> I don't know when did this start, I noticed it a couple or three
> day
2009/8/26 Thomas Adam :
> 2009/8/26 FVWM CVS :
>> CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm
>> Module name: fvwm
>> Changes by: griph 09/08/25 18:27:08
>>
>> Modified files:
>> fvwm : builtins.c ewmh.c ewmh_icons.c
>
> Changelog? Possibly NEWS?
>
Sorry about that. I commited in the
2009/8/25 Gautam Iyer :
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 04:52:15PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
>
>>> I'll follow Viktor's suggestion next and send a backtrace to
>>> fvwm-workers. Any other suggestions on how to fix this are more than
>>> welcome,
>>
>
2009/8/18 Yann Dirson :
>> There have been several bug fixes since 2.5.27 was released in
>> February, and I think it's time to release 2.5.28. Are there any
>> pending patches, or bugs that has to be considered before a release?
>
> Hi,
>
> I have not seen any feedback from my second version of th
2009/4/16 Yann Dirson :
> Hello,
>
> Here is my second version of the layer_change event patch, hopefully
> addressing the points raised in reply to the first one. The core code is
> unchanged, only changes to perllib and doc/changelog files have been
> added.
>
> We needed to trace and hook some
There have been several bug fixes since 2.5.27 was released in
February, and I think it's time to release 2.5.28. Are there any
pending patches, or bugs that has to be considered before a release?
/Viktor
2009/7/10 Vincent Lefevre :
> On 2009-07-09 23:33:04 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
>> I think part of the problem is your continued assertion that WM_NAME
>> is used in preference of _NET_WM_NAME, and it's being blind-sighted a
>> little. So please, I'd like you to detail step-by-step here, exactly
>>
While reading the FvwmEvent source code I've noticed several issues
with it's configuration system that needs fixing. However I'm not sure
what the best fix is for all the issues, so I'll start by listing the
issues:
* RPlayVolume and RPlayPriority is not honored at all. They are
defined in handle
2009/6/30 Manoj Srivastava :
> Hi,
>
> This was reported by a Debian use. Please retain the CC to
> 438132-forwar...@bugs.debian.org so that the Dewbian BTS has a
> copy of your contribution.
>
> I have not been able to reproduce this crash, but I am passing
> it along
2009/7/1 Thomas Adam :
> 2009/7/1 FVWM CVS :
>> CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm
>> Module name: fvwm
>> Changes by: griph 09/07/01 15:47:57
>>
>> Modified files:
>> . : NEWS ChangeLog
>> sample.fvwmrc : system.fvwm2rc-sample-95
>>
>> Log message:
>> sed -i '/^#*\
2009/7/1 Thomas Adam :
> Hi --
>
> 2009/7/1 Manoj Srivastava :
>> The menu lines in the sample config file are missing the trailing %
>> signs for icon images. This patch fixes them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manoj Srivastava
>> ---
>> sample.fvwmrc/system.fvwm2rc-sample-95 | 40
>>
2009/6/30 Manoj Srivastava :
> Hi,
>
> This was reported by a Debian user. Please retain the CC to
> 449248-forwar...@bugs.debian.org so that the Debian BTS has a
> record of your contribution.
>
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> Some menu
2009/3/24 Jason Weber :
> The left/top sensitivity has me suspecting
> something related to a negative pixel coordinate. Hmm, is there
> some relative encoding with negative numbers?
If you are using the Move command, then yes. negative coordinates
are distance from right/bottom. You may prefix a
2009/3/22 Mikhael Goikhman :
> I don't remember a discussion when the new event type MX_REPLY was
> added, so I will tell my observations now.
There was no discussion. I introduced it to get rid of the extreme delay in
motion when moving around the viewport by dragging button 2 in FvwmPager.
>
>
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Thomas Adam wrote:
2009/3/9 Viktor Griph :
I think it would be great if fvwm could apply as a mentoring organization in
this year's GSOC. I would be interested in working as a student on fvwm if
anyone has the time to mentor me. This will most likely be the last s
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Thomas Adam wrote:
* style/state rewrite
- unify the syntax for styles and states of windows, and make all states
matchable with conditionals
This is *huge* -- not something I would recommend as an undertaking of GSOC.
You are probably right. I think that trying to com
I think it would be great if fvwm could apply as a mentoring organization
in this year's GSOC. I would be interested in working as a student on fvwm
if anyone has the time to mentor me. This will most likely be the last
summer I'll be eligible to participate as a student, and I'd really like
to
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Thomas Adam wrote:
2009/1/22 Thomas Adam :
I shall come up with something soon enough for review. Should be fun.
And so I have. I've made "MapCommand" accept anything (i.e., a valid
FVWM builtin, or a defined function) and in so doing have done the
following:
* Deprecat
In events.s in the function __handle_cr_on_client there is an ifdef
EXPERIMENTAL_ANTI_RACE_CONDITION_CODE with the comment
/* Merge all pending ConfigureRequests for the window into a single
* event. However, we can not do this if the window uses the motion
* method aut
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
They are the following:
# XXX: gtk2 perl bindings require dev-perl/gtk2-perl, worth a dependency?
# XXX: gtk perl bindings require dev-perl/gtk-perl, worth a dependency?
# XXX: netpbm is used by FvwmScript-ScreenDump, worth a dependency?
I can clearl
This is something I noticed a while back, but put aside fixing it since
it's not very severe, and I couldn't think of what the solution should
be.
The issue is that it is possible to create several menus with the same
name, the latest definition being used inplace of earlier definitions, but
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Dominik Vogt wrote:
@Victor: I wanted to say that it might make sense to have a
style similar to ItemFormat for the vertical layout too.
Ah, I see now. I miss interpreted your mail. Now that I read it again I
see what you said.
I don't think there would be an easy way t
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:22:19 +0100 (CET)
Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 07:31:40AM +0100, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
MenuStyle * VerticalMargins 2 3
This defines a mar
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 07:31:40AM +0100, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
MenuStyle * VerticalMargins 2 3
This defines a margin of 2pix from the top border of the menu, and
3pix on the bottom. In my opinion, this improves the look of the
menu when you have selec
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, FVWM CVS wrote:
* FIxed drawing of background pictures in menu items.
Did you test the change with Pixmap backgrounds (especially TiledPixmap)?
I don't have time to test anything today, but using a TiledPixmap, for
items and another one with the same pattern, but different
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Adam Goode wrote:
Hi,
Am I missing something or are you forgetting to update a ->next pointer
somewhere? (It looks like you are leaving the previous next pointing to
the freed structure.)
The old code, while uglier, I think handled that case.
I do update it. The position
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Adam Goode wrote:
Hi,
FVWM segfaults under certain conditions described here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382321 and especially here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382321#c12
This happens even in the CVS version.
It is a problem with an error
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 07:25:15PM -0500, James M. Leddy wrote:
in regard to this 4 year old post:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg05078.html
Relevant parts inlined
On December 14th, 2003 Mikhael Goikhman said:
I know that it should n
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Dan Espen wrote:
Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Scott,
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 12:38:34PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Now that we have the html docs, someone has t
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Dan Espen wrote:
Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Scott,
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 12:38:34PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Now that we have the html docs, someone has to write down detailed
instructions in docs/DEVELOPER how to get the html files into
fvwm-web durin
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Tom Horsley wrote:
Judging from the test program source, it is apparently
(God knows why) some sort of GTK convention to write this
sequence when bringing up a window:
gtk_widget_show_all(window);
gtk_widget_hide(window);
gtk_widget_show(window);
I've commited a f
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Thomas Adam wrote:
On 02/12/2007, Tom Horsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is a link to bug reporting on the fvwm home page
and when I followed it and reported a bug, my bug didn't show
up in the incoming list.
Is there some secret handshake I don't know about? Or is
th
On 8/28/07, Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:57:22PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> > > On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Tue
On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:57:22PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> > On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:34:55AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > > By the way, there's another issue with the buil
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/30/07, Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:35:19AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/30/07, Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 06:24:52PM -0500, FVWM CVS wrote:
Log message:
updated
On 8/29/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/29/07, Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/29/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ok, everything is done except putting the tarballs in the ftp dir (I
> > >
On 8/29/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, everything is done except putting the tarballs in the ftp dir (I
> seem to have forgotten my password.. already emailed Jason about
> this).
there is no password for the incoming folder.
/Viktor
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:57:22PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:34:55AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
By the way, there's another issue with the build process:
* The docume
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 02:55:26PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/28/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 02:13:20PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/28/07,
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 02:13:20PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/28/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OOPS:
$ make CFLAGS="-g -O2 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -fno-strict-aliasing -W
On 8/21/07, Scott Smedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Viktor,
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 05:05:21PM -0500, FVWM CVS wrote:
> > CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm
> > Module name: fvwm
> > Changes by: griph 07/08/16 17:05:21
> >
> > Modified files:
> > doc: ChangeLog
> >
On 8/19/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:42:15AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:09:46PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> > > On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Can you
On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 06:13:49PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > >On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:26:30PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> > >>On Fri, 17 Aug
On 8/17/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Single quotes are written ' not \'
> * A line must not begin with a single quote
Both these fixed.
> Has this been doen?
>
> > * The boolean arguments section is still missing from the new
> > manpage.
>
Yes, booleanArgs.xml is put
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:26:30PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Yes. I'm now looking at the issues brought up by requiring sed,
perl and tbl for building the docs.
So, is everything ready for release?
A
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Yes. I'm now looking at the issues brought up by requiring sed,
perl and tbl for building the docs.
So, is everything ready for release?
/Viktor
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 10:13:19PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Most important: the generated man page is still broken. For
example:
allbox tab(:); lB lB lB. T
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Most important: the generated man page is still broken. For
example:
allbox tab(:); lB lB lB. T{ T}:T{ depth 8 (256 colors) T}:T{
depth 4 (16 colors) T} l l l l l l l l l. T{ PseudoColor T}:T{ 68
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:08:51PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
yOn Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
I'll look into it if you can gi
yOn Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
I'll look into it if you can give me some hint on how to fix automake for
the doc directory on my macbook.
What's the problem?
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:08:57AM +0100
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:08:57AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/6/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:08:57AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/6/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
The NEWS file is getting long, so I believe a new release would be
go
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/6/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
The NEWS file is getting long, so I believe a new release would be
good.
Yes.
Ok, so where do we stand now?
* The new module co
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Daniel Vrcic wrote:
Hi list.
I've following condition that I'm using in some of my conditional
commands
(CurrentPage, !Iconic, !ktray)
that is causing the crash due the free'ing of invalid pointer that is
triggered on
free(p->name - (pp->invert ? 1 : 0));
On 8/7/07, Scott Smedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not going to release fvwm with a big fat "FIXME"
>
> I didn't realise Viktor had already made a change to install the new
> man page. The "old" man page is still around.
>
> VG: any reason for installing the new man page & still building t
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Scott Smedley wrote:
The documentation:
* There are several FIXME comments in the generated
documentation. Try this:
$ cd doc
$ find . -type f | xargs grep -I FIXME
All the FIXME stuff in the docbook-xsl/ subdirectory can be safely ignored.
A better check:
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/5/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/5/07, Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, FVWM CVS wrote:
CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm
Module name: fvwm
Changes by: renato 07/08/05 15:49:11
Mo
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, FVWM CVS wrote:
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: renato 07/08/05 15:49:11
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
fvwm : events.c modconf.c module_interface.c
module_list.c module_list.
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, seventh guardian wrote:
On 7/16/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 05:03:59PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> Oh my... this is bad..
>
> In current cvs, this causes a segmentation fault:
>
> Open FvwmConsole
> Type "cursorstyle ROOT 10"
> (
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Scott Smedley wrote:
+
+ image.svg:
Please put the > before the newline.
One problem with that is that it will add whitespace between elements. The
only way to avoid whitespace is to have no singe newline, space or tab
between the closing '>' of a tag and the star
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, seventh guardian wrote:
About the doc page creation, it seemed simple at first, but I had to
search hard for the relevant info. Maybe a clearer how-to should be
created? This is the first time I'm creating a manual entry, so here
are my steps:
1. enter doc/commands
2. copy
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 03:41:38PM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
I need confirmation I'm not crazy.
This works ok (substitute rxvt for xterm if appropriate):
AddToFunc fn I Exec exec rxvt $*
fn -e sleep 4
this is ok too:
AddToFunc fn3 I Test (x rxvt) E
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:52:58PM +0200, Simon Griph wrote:
I've split up my previous patch into six smaller ones, making it
more logical to follow.
The patches applies one after another.
(cat fvwm-xcursor_p?.diff | patch -p0)
or
(tar -xzOf fvwm-
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Should we upgrade to the GPLv3?
I have no objection.
/Viktor
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Scott Smedley wrote:
Hi Viktor,
a cursory inspection of the HTML output
shows something isn't quite right. There's a strange character in the
section headings (after the section number).
eg. It looks like "1.,Name" instead of "1. Name".
I can't reproduce this. It seems
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Scott Smedley wrote:
Hi Victor,
* use more precise docbook tags in many places
Your changes are good. However, a cursory inspection of the HTML output
shows something isn't quite right. There's a strange character in the
section headings (after the section number).
eg. I
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, FVWM CVS wrote:
* use more precise docbook tags in many places
* use variablelist for the fvwm variable list instead of table
* make environment variables and keysyms typeset as before
I've started to compare the generated man page with the old hand written,
and the above c
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't understand why module points into a freed region of memory
here. The single list searching loop seems correct at the first glance.
The problem is that module_receive and FlushMessageQueue will destroy the
module structure on IO failiure (mod
I've been thinking some of this docbook documentation, and I think that it
would be better to generate the man-page during make dist, or when asked
for.
The generation process takes quite some time, and requires extra tools. It
will however still be the same for everyone that builds it, so the
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 08:28:06AM -0500, fvwm-workers wrote:
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: griph 07/06/03 08:28:06
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
fvwm : events.c focus.c icons
On Wed, 1 May 2007, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"VG" == Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
VG> It seems as if the build directory has files locally modified,
VG> which has resulted in a cvs-conflict.
It's never had anything other than plain CVS checkouts i
On Tue, 1 May 2007, seventh guardian wrote:
rm -f fvwm.sv_SE.gmo && /usr/bin/msgfmt -c --statistics -o fvwm.sv_SE.gmo
fvwm.sv_SE.po
fvwm.sv_SE.po:56:2: parse error
fvwm.sv_SE.po:56: keyword "fvwm" unknown
fvwm.sv_SE.po:61:2: parse error
fvwm.sv_SE.po:63: duplicate message definition
fvwm.sv_SE.
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
It seems that MouseFocus doesn't work with Java GUIs sometimes.
If I move the mouse into the Java window (e.g. tv-browser, or
the Accurev GUI), then the Window doesn't become active. Even
if I click on the header the title bar gets selected for
When sending a message to this list, please post replys below quoted text.
Also don't send HTML to this list.
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, julio teca wrote:
Hi Victor,
I have noticed that my entry has been removed from the
ChangeLog in the last snapshot. Could I ask what was wrong
about it?
It's
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
I have removed these two styles and replaced them with the much
more general style "PositionPlacement".
Can the code forcing the top left corner to be on screen be made optional
in some way. Either as a style or as a bugopt.
Also, the syntax suggests
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, julio teca wrote:
Hi Victor,
I am terribly sorry for the unexpected delay. Lately I have had a lot
of work.
The changelog and the man-page patch can be found at:
http://usuarios.lycos.es/staufway/FvwmScript.1.in.patch
http://usuarios.lycos.es/staufway/ChangeLog
If you hav
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
