On 04 Sep 2002 19:10:34 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> I understand your point. My point is:
>
> * Nobody except the developers should run fvwm-themes against
>CVS. And I guess it isn't hard to chop off the suffix from the
>version number in cvs.
It is possible to "correct" the versio
On 04 Sep 2002 19:20:56 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> Will "2.5.04" or "2.5.4.0" work?
Not any more than 2.5.4_cvs or 2.5.4.cvs.
Regards,
Mikhael.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the
body of a message
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 07:10:34PM +0200, fvwm-workers wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 04:44:58PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > On 04 Sep 2002 16:01:51 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually, it should *really* be everywhere where a user might see it:
> > >
> > > - configure summa
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 04:44:58PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 04 Sep 2002 16:01:51 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > Actually, it should *really* be everywhere where a user might see it:
> >
> > - configure summary
> > - man page
> > - fvwm --version
> > - fvwm-config
> > - tarball
On 04 Sep 2002 16:01:51 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> Actually, it should *really* be everywhere where a user might see it:
>
> - configure summary
> - man page
> - fvwm --version
> - fvwm-config
> - tarball name
> - ...
Actually, it should not be anywhere beside some human readable texts
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 10:44:35AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 04 Sep 2002 12:27:30 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > Then how about fvwm_cvs-x.y.z instead?
>
> Oh, no, fvwm-x.y.z_cvs is much better. :)
Coward ;-)
> I would like to know how other projects with cvs solve this. It seems
On 04 Sep 2002 12:27:30 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> Then how about fvwm_cvs-x.y.z instead?
Oh, no, fvwm-x.y.z_cvs is much better. :)
I would like to know how other projects with cvs solve this. It seems that
for most of the projects the version in cvs is simply 2.5.4 (the future
release numbe
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 10:02:17AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 04 Sep 2002 11:02:01 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 07:59:49AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > > On 04 Sep 2002 07:50:55 +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It is " (devel)" or " (not
On 04 Sep 2002 11:02:01 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 07:59:49AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > On 04 Sep 2002 07:50:55 +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > >
> > > It is " (devel)" or " (not released yet)" for the developement versions
> > > and empty for the stable re
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 07:59:49AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 04 Sep 2002 07:50:55 +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> >
> > It is " (devel)" or " (not released yet)" for the developement versions
> > and empty for the stable releases.
I missed that when reading your mail first. The idea i
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 07:50:55AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 02 Sep 2002 01:03:08 +0930, Alex Wallis wrote:
> >
> > I'm getting an error when doing a make rpm-dist
> >
> > error: line 15: Illegal char '-' in version: Version: 2.5.4-devel
> >
> > I think it should be 2.5.4_devel or 2
On 04 Sep 2002 07:50:55 +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
>
> It is " (devel)" or " (not released yet)" for the developement versions
> and empty for the stable releases.
Hmm, I meant "releases" not "stable releases".
Such DEVEL_STRING may be even used in FvwmConsole and $v if you like.
Regards,
Mi
On 02 Sep 2002 01:03:08 +0930, Alex Wallis wrote:
>
> I'm getting an error when doing a make rpm-dist
>
> error: line 15: Illegal char '-' in version: Version: 2.5.4-devel
>
> I think it should be 2.5.4_devel or 2.5.4.devel instead.
Although 2.5.4_devel or 2.5.4.devel will work, my opinion i
I'm getting an error when doing a make rpm-dist
error: line 15: Illegal char '-' in version: Version: 2.5.4-devel
I think it should be 2.5.4_devel or 2.5.4.devel instead.
Alex
--
Examinations are formidable even to the best prepared, for
even the greatest fool may ask more the the wisest ma
14 matches
Mail list logo