[FW-1] User Authentication with HTTP resource

2002-04-16 Thread Thelma B. Ebilane
hi,   i would like to ask if any of you have encountered a user authentication with http resource?   we created a generic*  user and a valid_user group, the rule is   source: valid_user@any destination: any service: http/https action: user authentication   this is working until we have i

[FW-1] Need Help.

2002-04-16 Thread Cruiser sg
Hi, I have a task to do which I am not too sure how to go about it. Currently, I have installed a CP FW-1 Ver 4.1 on an AIX box. At first, the FW Module and Management Module is installed in the same box. Right now, I am required to seperate the 2 modules into 2 seperate boxes. I have gotten the

Re: [FW-1] upgrade from 4.1 to NG and solaris 2.6 to 8

2002-04-16 Thread Rajesh
Hi Azeem, Thank you very much. Rajesh. >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >X-Priority: 3 (Normal) >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600. >Importance: Normal >Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 11:13:23 +0300 >From: Azeem Usman Bharde <[EMAIL PR

[FW-1] Dennis de Leest is out of the office.

2002-04-16 Thread Dennis de Leest
I will be out of the office starting 12-04-2002 and will not return until 23-04-2002. I will have limited access to my email during this period. For urgent issues please contact +31 40 2502602 My Collegue Hans van den Boomen will be your contact person during this period. Please reach him at +31

[FW-1] Deleted FTP service, now passive FTP is broken.

2002-04-16 Thread Tim Jones
Hello. We're having problems with an FTP application over SecureClient, and one of the things that they suggested to fix the issue was to remove the FTP service and define a new FTP service as type other. This didn't fix the problem; however, it seems to have broken outbound passive FTP. When a

[FW-1] syslog traffic

2002-04-16 Thread Glenn Mabbutt
Title: syslog traffic Can anyone give me an idea of how much throughput is used by sending fw-1 logs via syslog to a central syslogd server?? I'm looking at doing this with several 4.1 installations that have an average of 300 users behind them. Thanks, Glenn

Re: [FW-1] A Little OT: VeriSign Training Courses

2002-04-16 Thread Zeltser, Roman
Title: A Little OT: VeriSign Training Courses Consider SCP from SecurityCertified.net. It's more hands-on vs. slides-only and 250 people in a class.   >>> For my money, I prefer the SANS classes over any others.   Brian Drake Central Technology Services -Original

Re: [FW-1] Easy way to not log broadcasts?

2002-04-16 Thread Jim Parker
Thanks for clearing that up, interesting point, I'll test this tomorrow and see what happens. Subject: Re: [FW-1] Easy way to not log broadcasts? The issue I have is that with a default installation of NG FP1 the 'Broadcast Address - Included / Not Included' button in a 'Network Properties' ma

Re: [FW-1] VPN

2002-04-16 Thread Rocky Stefano
They never purchased anything. Its called SCMD in Netware 5/6. It allows for ipx tunnelling in ip. There are different way of running it. -Original Message- From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Parker Sent: April 16, 2002 3:38 PM To: [

Re: [FW-1] VPN

2002-04-16 Thread Luis Aguilera
Yes, Novell makes something that should work. I think it's called "IP/IPX Gateway". I set it up a while back using Intranetware 4.11 server -- which is IPX native -- so I could connect this server to an IP-based network. But I wasn't using a CP FW or VPN. Keep in mind that while possible, this

Re: [FW-1] Easy way to not log broadcasts?

2002-04-16 Thread Paul . Simons
The issue I have is that with a default installation of NG FP1 the 'Broadcast Address - Included / Not Included' button in a 'Network Properties' makes no difference. Not only that but the broadcasts are actually 'accepted' on the interface. The only way I could achieve the correct action was to c

Re: [FW-1] VPN

2002-04-16 Thread Jim Parker
Interesting. I think Novell produced a product to encapsulate ipx in an ip packet, i assume you could then route that over the vpn. Would be interested in what you find out. -Original Message- Subject: [FW-1] VPN This is probably a stupid question, but I'll ask it anyway. If I use Se

[FW-1] INLINE HTTP CLIENT AUTH - FULLY AUTOMATIC

2002-04-16 Thread Jim Parker
Ok guys, I need some input from you, Can someone test/explain this next problem to me? I've been trying to figure this out for a week. I've tested it on SP2, SP3, SP4, SP5 and NG FP1. In test, simple rulebase: users@any - web_server - http - client_auth_fully_automatic any- any-

Re: [FW-1] Easy way to not log broadcasts?

2002-04-16 Thread Jim Parker
I don't really understand the issue? If you don't want to see something dropped in the last rule the create a silent drop/accept rule? How would you have it done? -Original Message- Subject: Re: [FW-1] Easy way to not log broadcasts? An even shorter answer is 'no' I have a support call

Re: [FW-1] A Little OT: VeriSign Training Courses

2002-04-16 Thread Frank Darden
Title: A Little OT: VeriSign Training Courses It is a pity that you all had what seems to be a bad experience at Verisign.  I personally review all of the student comment sheets here at Mission Critical Systems and have yet to get less than excellent comments from our students.  I can unde

Re: [FW-1] CheckPoint NG and Stonebeat Fullcluster 3.0 in Solaris 8 (64 bit s)

2002-04-16 Thread Paul . Simons
Not yet suported ftp://download.stonesoft.com/web/Marketing/SBOS-REQL1.pdf |+--> || Rodrigo Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | || Sent by: Mailing list for discussion| || of Firewall-1

Re: [FW-1] CheckPoint NG and Stonebeat Fullcluster 3.0 in Solaris 8 (64 bit s)

2002-04-16 Thread Paul . Simons
Sorry - supported only with Cluster-XL and SB hotfix 3 __ Not yet suported ftp://download.stonesoft.com/web/Marketing/SBOS-REQL1.pdf |+--> || Rodrigo Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | || Sent b

Re: [FW-1] Easy way to not log broadcasts?

2002-04-16 Thread Paul . Simons
An even shorter answer is 'no' I have a support call with CP on this very subject. Last I heard it had been escalated why up high... Paul PS: Work around was to put the rule in |+--> || Kim Longenbaugh | |

Re: [FW-1] A Little OT: VeriSign Training Courses

2002-04-16 Thread Chris Curtis
Title: A Little OT: VeriSign Training Courses I attended a FW1 class about a year ago and it was a bad experience.  The instructor was very good but the books were lousy.  The instructor said the books were not correct in a lot of cases and we were making changes as we went through the cla

Re: [FW-1] Easy way to not log broadcasts?

2002-04-16 Thread Kim Longenbaugh
disable TCPIP? :) >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/16/02 10:28AM >>> Hi, my logs are full of blocked broadcasts. Is there an easy way to make sure broadcasts are not logged (except for writing a rule that just drops them without logging) ? Nico

[FW-1] Easy way to not log broadcasts?

2002-04-16 Thread Nico De Ranter
Hi, my logs are full of blocked broadcasts. Is there an easy way to make sure broadcasts are not logged (except for writing a rule that just drops them without logging) ? Nico - "It has been said that there are only two businesses that

[FW-1] VPN

2002-04-16 Thread Larry Walden
This is probably a stupid question, but I'll ask it anyway. If I use SecureRemote or SecureClient on a PC and create a VPN back to an NG firewall can I only send IP traffic over the VPN? In other words, is there any way to send IPX over that VPN link also? Is there any way to encapsulate that

Re: [FW-1] cron job sending mail

2002-04-16 Thread Owens, Blaine C - Eastman
Redirect the cron output to /dev/null: x x x x x /path/scriptname >/dev/null 2>&1 -Original Message- From: Scott Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FW-1] cron job sending mail I am running a Firewall module on a Nokia

Re: [FW-1] NG FP1 management problems

2002-04-16 Thread Roelandts, Guy
Simon, Will try this as soon as I have some spare time again. Thank you for the reply anyway. Met vriendelijke groeten - Bien à vous - Kind regards Guy ROELANDTS EMEA GS Internet Expertise Centre - CCSA & CCSE Compaq Software Engineer - Belgium E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +32(02)729.7

Re: [FW-1] NG FP1 management problems

2002-04-16 Thread Roelandts, Guy
Richard, Thank you for the input, this configuration was working just fine in 4.1, having used the same trick as you, masters file containing both entries NAT'ted and unNAT'ted addresses, but NG does not use this anymore, it seems to get the node infos from the objects_5_0.C file, and it n

[FW-1] cron job sending mail

2002-04-16 Thread Scott Murray
I am running a Firewall module on a Nokia IP650. I have a simple script which does some file backups. For some reason everytime the script is finished running, the system send an e-mail From: admin@[hostname] To: root. How can I stop this from happening? Scott ___

Re: [FW-1] A Little OT: VeriSign Training Courses

2002-04-16 Thread Joseph J. Gallo
Yes, I have attended two and in both instances the labs did not work the way they were supposed to, or the hardware was broke or misconfigured. For the amount of money spent on the courses, these problems should not happen. When things did work, I learned new things but not as much as I wanted

[FW-1] CheckPoint NG and Stonebeat Fullcluster 3.0 in Solaris 8 (64 bit s)

2002-04-16 Thread Rodrigo Borges
Hello all, Has anybody tried this configuration? I've been told that Fullcluster 3.0 works fine in 64bits mode but still, it isn't officialy supported. And maybe when Stonesoft releases a new HF (5?) that supports CP FP2 it would also supports 64bits. Any opinion about that? Regards, Rodrigo B

Re: [FW-1] A Little OT: VeriSign Training Courses

2002-04-16 Thread Don Guyer
Title: A Little OT: VeriSign Training Courses Carlos,       I appreciate you taking the time to answer my question, thanks!   Don Guyer Information Systems Citadel Federal Credit Union [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 800.666.0191 x7072 Fax: 610.380.6083 www.citadelfcu.org -Original Message-

Re: [FW-1] A Little OT: VeriSign Training Courses

2002-04-16 Thread Drake, Brian
Title: A Little OT: VeriSign Training Courses I've gone to both FW-1 and Applied hacking. Both were very good, but expensive. For my money, I prefer the SANS classes over any others.   Brian Drake Central Technology Services -Original Message- From: Don Guyer [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [FW-1] Problem with asmtp

2002-04-16 Thread Srinivasa Rao Bandaru
I could see something strange happening on the firewall.. Sometimes Firewall is initiating connections to other mail servers on ports other than SMTP port and the XlateSPort for them is mail/smtp. These connections are dropped according to my rules..After 5 attempts on the same the port to the oth

Re: [FW-1] NG FP1 management problems

2002-04-16 Thread Churcher, Simon
Guy, Try the following ... Check that the management has external host entries for each remote module Check that the remote modules have the external address of the management in their hosts file Put two NAT rules on the remote module ... MGMT-NAT > Remote-Module - MGMT-REAL > Original

Re: [FW-1] NG FP1 management problems

2002-04-16 Thread Richard Marshall
don't know if this will help, as not using NG yet... but i use both the internal and external names of the managment server in the masters file, having defined internal and external names/ips on the firewall hosts files. -Original Message- From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 [

[FW-1] AW: [FW-1] SMTP and Unknown Established TCP packet

2002-04-16 Thread Christian Betz
Hi, I did everything but it still doesn't work. The log entry "unknown established tcp packet" comes only when the mail servers send data. handshake, helo etc. works fine, really! Who can give a hint? Regards, Christian -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [FW-1] upgrade from 4.1 to NG and solaris 2.6 to 8

2002-04-16 Thread Azeem Usman Bharde
there will not be any problem. regards azeem -Original Message- From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rajesh Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FW-1] upgrade from 4.1 to NG and solaris 2.6 to 8 Hello ev

Re: [FW-1] Do we have to get new license when FW IP change?

2002-04-16 Thread Sim, CT (Chee Tong)
Sorry me again, I want to ask if we change the IP address which the license tied to, then we got to change the odject(gateway) in the policy rule right? But we need to fwstop before we change the IP address on the firewall NIC card. After changing the IP and we fwstart it, by default it will load

Re: [FW-1] NAT problem with FW's external IP address and port selection

2002-04-16 Thread Theo van den Beld
Sid Van den Heede wrote: > I'm trying to setup a firewall on a network where I have one public IP address > assigned. I want to have incoming http requests forwarded to an internal > machine (private IP address). > > I have a rule that resembles this: > > Any -> firewall-public-address (http) Ac

Re: [FW-1] Do we have to get new license when FW IP change?

2002-04-16 Thread Sim, CT (Chee Tong)
Hi..Geoffrey and dear all, When you say changing IP by myself on web, are you referring to go to the usercenter--> License / Move IP and change the IP address there. After that it will generate the license and we have to go download license file section to download it? Is that the correct proce

[FW-1] upgrade from 4.1 to NG and solaris 2.6 to 8

2002-04-16 Thread Rajesh
Hello everyone, I've upgraded the management console from solaris 2.6 to solaris 8 and Checkpoint Firewall from 4.1 to NG. It is running on a sparc 5 machine. Since sparc 5 doesn't support 64 bit I've booted the system in 32 bit. Now I want to upgrade firewall module (both operating system from

[FW-1] Vpn -> Cisco Vpn

2002-04-16 Thread Skar
Hi, I am trying to connect a Cisco Vpn concentrator behind a Pix Firewall, via Cisco SW Vpn client behind Firewall-1. Vpn clients are hide nated on the Fw-1. Cisco SW Vpn clients support Ipsec Udp encapsulation. Rule base and configuration is Okey on the Firewall-1 and Cisco Site. However, no suce