Hi,
Sorry for not opening this bug report, but I still didn't get posting
permission on JIRA.
Anyway, thanks for fixes, but it still doesn't work as expected.
Frontend 'File' is little bit different than others as cache validity
should be calculated basing on master file's modification time and
Hi all,
When using the form helpers I noticed that passing an attribute of
readonly => readonly effectively disables (in the framework sense) the
element. It is then replaced with a hidden element of the same name.
I'm quite baffled as to why it does that. My use case is that I have a
text f
http://svn.ralphschindler.com/repo/ZendFramework/library/
It currently uses Zend_Session, also implementing countable, iteratable
interface. I use it to add messages in my controllers, and also to
retrieve messages in my view scripts.
FlashMessage::add($message);
if (FlashMessage::hasMessag
Hi Sebi,
I've done with the first optimization issue and committed it. Please try
current SVN version.
In my environment it's faster (!) than Java Lucene for simple queries
and has near the same result for complex boolean queries.
If second optimization issue will be also fixed, then it has
-- Forwarded message --
From: Fabien MARTY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 8 févr. 2007 18:37
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Zend_Cache - Caching files to files
To: Bartosz Maciaszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
Anyway, thanks for fixes, but it still doesn't work as expected.
Frontend 'File' i
Right, the Zend_Session API has changed very significantly yesterday,
and we are in the stages of finializing the would be ZF 1.0 Zend_Session
api. I will update FlashMessage to work with whats currently in svn,
but do know that it could change only slightly more since we are in the
finializin
Thank you Alexander.
I will try the SVN right now. :)
I will keep you in touch with any result.
See you.
- Original Message
From: Alexander Veremyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Sebi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2007 6:27:07 PM
Subject: Re:
Tautvydas Andrikys wrote:
Noticed this while doing query with
Zend_Db_Adapter_Pdo_Mysql::fetchOne(...). After digging deeper into
code I've found out that there is something wrong with PDO query
execution. PDO somehow strangely executes this query:
SELECT 'break:pdo \ xe:xe'
Your code samples
Is the manual (or 'Programmer's Reference Guide') available as a PDF? I
noticed somewhere that it was in Docbook format, so creating a PDF shouldn't
be too hard, just not sure if anyone has made one.
colin
Hi
Actually if I set 'lifeTime' to 'null' expireTime seems to be set to
99 in Cache/Backend/File.php around line 487:
private function _expireTime($lifeTime)
{
if (is_null($this->_directives['lifeTime'])) {
return 99;
}
return time() + $lifeT
You are right (File frontend is broken in SVN (only))
I'm going to :
- open a bug report
- have a look at unit tests
- work on the problem
Thanks
2007/2/8, Bartosz Maciaszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi
Actually if I set 'lifeTime' to 'null' expireTime seems to be set to
99 in Cache/Backen
The manual is updated quite frequently. I use the online wiki copy,
which is updated hourly from the XML docbook sources:
Core Library
http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDOCDEV/Home
Incubator Library
http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDOC/Home
Click the "Browse Space" link in the u
Hy,
a friend of mine asked me why someone can change private and protected
properties from an class within PHP.
From my understanding of OOP and class handling a private property must not
be changed or visible from outside the class.
And protected properties should only be visible and change
First of all, I think it is important to note that this has nothing to
do with security. Anyone who relies on OOP visibility features for any
security is making a serious mistake, these are not security features
and should not be used as such.
From my understanding of OOP and class handling a
This is also easily achieved through the Reflection API and is a designed
feature.
The purpose of private/protected modifiers is ONLY to help developers use
classes as intended. It is not a security model in any way shape or form.
Kevin McArthur
- Original Message -
From: "Stanislav
Hmm, the bug report doesn't try changing a private property. It changes
the public properties of the StdClass. StdClass's properties are always
public.
Am i missing something?
Andriesss
Thomas Weidner schreef:
Hy,
a friend of mine asked me why someone can change private and protected
pro
-- Gavin Vess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Thursday, 08 February 2007, 10:39 AM -0800):
> The manual is updated quite frequently. I use the online wiki copy,
> which is updated hourly from the XML docbook sources:
>
> Core Library
> http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDOCDEV/Home
> Incubat
You are right but the content of a private property will be manipulated
and I think it is the same if you change a private property directly or
the content of it. You are changing its state.
Hmm, the bug report doesn't try changing a private property. It
changes the public properties of the St
The change to use xinclude in the incubator manual.xml requires changes
to the wikification.
Andries is working on this.
Cheers,
Gavin
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
-- Gavin Vess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Thursday, 08 February 2007, 10:39 AM -0800):
The manual is updated quite frequent
-- Jan Pieper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Thursday, 08 February 2007, 09:30 PM +0100):
> You are right but the content of a private property will be manipulated
> and I think it is the same if you change a private property directly or
> the content of it. You are changing its state.
Even in th
-- Gavin Vess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Thursday, 08 February 2007, 12:31 PM -0800):
> The change to use xinclude in the incubator manual.xml requires changes
> to the wikification.
> Andries is working on this.
Ah -- that makes sense. Thanks for the update!
> Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
Okay, it is no security lack, and you cannot manipulate non object
properties but it also shouldn´t be possible to change a state of an
private property containing an object. It is very abstract but there is
the possibility to manipulate the object and i think it is an error. You
must not have
Is this normal behaviour ??
Was my prof at the university wrong with standard oop definitions ??
I think this behaviour is normal, because it isn't a object anymore. you
cast it explicit to an array.
it would be strange, if you wouldn't be able to access any element of an
array.
Chris
It is no object any more, okay, but isn´t it like iterating about an
object by a foreach loop? Only public properties will be recorgnized. So
after casting the object to an array you should only have the public
properties because you do not need protected and private properties.
Is this norm
Hy,
Is this normal behaviour ??
Was my prof at the university wrong with standard oop definitions ??
I think this behaviour is normal, because it isn't a object anymore. you
cast it explicit to an array.
it would be strange, if you wouldn't be able to access any element of an
array.
What's
I understand your point, but I'm not sure how this discussion relates to
Zend Framework. Perhaps it's better to direct this question to
php-general@lists.php.net instead.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Pieper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 12:55 P
You are right but the content of a private property will be manipulated
and I think it is the same if you change a private property directly or
the content of it. You are changing its state.
It's definitely not like you change the property directly. It's more
like you would store value in the
Hi
Now it works brilliantly. Thanks!
Bartosz
2007/2/8, Fabien MARTY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-877
2007/2/8, Bartosz Maciaszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
>
> Actually if I set 'lifeTime' to 'null' expireTime seems to be set to
> 99 in Cache/Backend/
I would like to put the bootstrap in a subdirectory of the webservers
document root. But I'm not having any luck getting it to work.
Want I want is
ab.com/members/FooController/action
ab.com/members/FoobarController/action etc,etc.
I'm pretty sure I need to change to the route,but have not been
Just a couple of things:
- public function getPart($part)
+ public function &getPart($part) // Returns part by reference
instead of as a copy to conserve memory
public function reset($part = null)
{
if ($part == null) {
-$this->_parts = $this->_partsInit;
+
30 matches
Mail list logo
