On Oct 16, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Tina K. wrote:
On 2010/10/16 18:33, dorayme so eloquently wrote:
I would like to change my preferences for reading this group. I
want to
try just using it via Google Groups and stop the email digest. Not
sure
where to do this?
For some reason the unsubscribe l
On 2010/10/16 18:33, dorayme so eloquently wrote:
I would like to change my preferences for reading this group. I want to
try just using it via Google Groups and stop the email digest. Not sure
where to do this?
For some reason the unsubscribe link is missing on the g3-5-list and I
ran into th
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Differences between single and dual G4 Quicksilvers
Date:Sonntag 17 Oktober 2010N
From:Powermac
To: "G-Group"
> So what are my options on the slow single G4-800 on a QS2002?
As far as I know, every QS2002 processor card should w
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Differences between single and dual G4 Quicksilvers
Date:Sonntag 17 Oktober 2010N
From:Peter Haas
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> On Oct 16, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Powermac wrote:
> > So what are my options on the slow single G4-800 o
I would like to change my preferences for reading this group. I want
to try just using it via Google Groups and stop the email digest. Not
sure where to do this?
--
dorayme
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Mac
On Oct 16, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Powermac wrote:
So what are my options on the slow single G4-800 on a QS2002?
Not so good. Runs hot.
I up-clocked my 733 to 800, and gave up ... too hot.
Bought a dual 1000 for it.
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
So what are my options on the slow single G4-800 on a QS2002?
On Oct 16, 4:07 pm, "Mac User #330250" wrote:
> -- Original message --
> Subject: Re: Differences between single and dual G4 Quicksilvers
> Date: Samstag 16 Oktober 2010N
> From: Peter Haas
> To: g3-5-l..
Hi!
A few months ago I purchased four Dual-450 processor cards from GE's to put
into my two G4 AGP, originally 400 MHz.
One of the G4 AGP's came with an OWC 1.4 GHz upgrade, but that is another
story.
Anyway, I tested all four Dual-450 processors and everything looked normal.
Only, when I ran
On Oct 16, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Linda wrote:
all of a sudden my computer wants me to 'unlock screen'. "You must
authenticat to unloc screen"
The computer is left on, the screen saver is running but when I move
the mouse the screen goes blank and I have to input my user
password. The comput
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Differences between single and dual G4 Quicksilvers
Date:Samstag 16 Oktober 2010N
From:Peter Haas
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> The way Apple designed the dual 800 and dual 1000 board, although
> using the same raw board, it is
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Differences between single and dual G4 Quicksilvers
Date:Samstag 16 Oktober 2010N
From:"ah...clem"
To: "G-Group"
> […] ANY DP that
> physically fits the electronic connection will work. even the 450/500
> DPs from a GE will work
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 19:11 +0200, Mac User #330250 wrote:
> -- Original message --
> Subject: Re: Differences between single and dual G4 Quicksilvers
> Date:Samstag 16 Oktober 2010N
> From:Peter Haas
> To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
>
> I always thought that the du
Model Name: Power Mac G4
Model Identifier: PowerMac3,6
Processor Name:PowerPC G4 (3.3)
Processor Speed: 1.25 GHz
Number Of CPUs:1
L2 Cache (per CPU):256 KB
L3 Cache (per CPU):1 MB
Memory:2 GB
Bus Speed: 167 MHz
System Version: Mac OS X 10
On Oct 16, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
I don't get this.
Is the board the same or is it not?
The "raw" board is the same.
The "stuffed" board is quite different.
There are places for two voltage regulator systems. The 800 MHz uses
one regulator system, the 1000 MHz uses an
On 2010/10/16 10:50, James Therrault so eloquently wrote:
This question is regarding a certain newsgroup, (I subscribe to
Giganews), that I can no longer connect to. I know that the group is
still alive as you can pick it up on google but that really sucks. I
subscribe to twelve groups, (includi
the boards are the same. period. you can certainly run a dual 800
from a QS 2001 in your '02 without any other modifications, and the
benefit is not only two processors versus one, the single 800 on the
QS 2002 (just like the single 733 on the QS 2001) has NO level 2
cache. none. there is a hug
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Differences between single and dual G4 Quicksilvers
Date:Samstag 16 Oktober 2010N
From:Peter Haas
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> Dual processor support was added for real, and for
> good somewhere in the gigabit ethernet series.
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Differences between single and dual G4 Quicksilvers
Date:Samstag 16 Oktober 2010N
From:Peter Haas
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> The "raw" (i.e. unpopulated) board is the same between the 0.8 GHz
> (AKA, 800 MHz) and the 1.0 GHz
On Oct 16, 2010, at 9:01 AM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
You will need at least the dual 1.0 G4 …
Why is that? Won't the Dual-800 MHz from the QS2001 also work in the
Single-800 MHz QS2002?
Sure, a dual 0.8 GHz would be fine, but the dual 1.0 GHz are easier
to find.
The "raw" (i.e. unpopula
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Differences between single and dual G4 Quicksilvers
Date:Samstag 16 Oktober 2010N
From:Peter Haas
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> You will need at least the dual 1.0 G4 …
Why is that? Won't the Dual-800 MHz from the QS2001 also
-- Original message --
Subject: 64-bit question
Date:Samstag 16 Oktober 2010N
From:Arnel Tuazon
To: "G-List"
> I know my G5 is 64-bit (I have the late 2005 dual core PPC G5), but is
> Leopard (10.5.9) 64-bit?
Yes and no.
The kernel is 32-bit, but it can run 64-bit
This question is regarding a certain newsgroup, (I subscribe to
Giganews), that I can no longer connect to. I know that the group is
still alive as you can pick it up on google but that really sucks. I
subscribe to twelve groups, (including this one), and have no
problems with any of the o
On Oct 16, 12:29 am, Joshua Juran wrote:
>
> What do you mean by 64-bit?
>
> If there's nothing specific that you're trying to accomplish, and
> you're just curious... then sure, Leopard is 64-bit, according to
> Apple's marketing at the time. :-)
Meaning that Leopard had some modules work
On Oct 15, 2010, at 9:46 PM, Powermac wrote:
Is there a difference on the motherboards on the single and dual G4
Quicksilvers? Can you go from single to dual or the other way with no
problems?
No difference. Dual processor support was added for real, and for
good somewhere in the gigabit eth
On 10/15/10 11:46 PM, Powermac wrote:
Is there a difference on the motherboards on the single and dual G4
Quicksilvers? Can you go from single to dual or the other way with no
problems?
Currently I have a QS2002 single G4-800 with no L3 cache that is about
half as slow as my QS2001 with a Sonne
The motherboards are the same. You can put a dual on a motherboard that came
with a single and it will work just fine.
-Jonas
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list F
26 matches
Mail list logo
