On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Tina K. wrote:
>> /sbin/mount -w /dev/disk1s2 /Volumes/TardisToo
>
> In single user mode I entered:
>
> /sbin/mount -w /dev/disk1s3/Volumes/User%20HDD
>
> and it returned this message:
>
> "Unknown special file or file system"
%20 for a space is html-ese, in the
At 8:57 PM -0700 11/30/2010, Tina K. wrote:
Speaking of Applejack, does anyone know how to get it to clean user
caches and check user prefs when the user folder is on a different
drive? I've tried entering the user name, user number, and file path
but it won't accept any of them.
On 2010/12/01 09:17, Bruce Johnson so eloquently wrote:
On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Tina K. wrote:
Speaking of Applejack, does anyone know how to get it to clean
user caches and check user prefs when the user folder is on a
different drive? I've tried entering the user name, user number
On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Tina K. wrote:
> Speaking of Applejack, does anyone know how to get it to clean user caches
> and check user prefs when the user folder is on a different drive? I've tried
> entering the user name, user number, and file path but it won't accep
Speaking of Applejack, does anyone know how to get it to clean user
caches and check user prefs when the user folder is on a different
drive? I've tried entering the user name, user number, and file path but
it won't accept any of them. I asked on the Applejack forum, and
submi
ng. Make sure none of them are
launching Mail explicitly.
Use OnyX to check preference files.
>So I ran Applejack and typed in r for restart. In red letters I got
>"{ 41 918448} UniNEnet:restart Receiver" over and over and was
>continuing until I used the restart button. A
Updated iTunes on my G4 with OS 10.5.8 and had Mail start up over
night. Checked and system preference accounts is not set to open Mail.
Under preferences for Mail is set for Thunderbird to be the default.
So I ran Applejack and typed in r for restart. In red letters I got
"{ 41 9
k. The actual wordage I get when I key in
>>>> applejack from Single User Mode is, "applejack is not recognized
>>>> as an
>>>> internal or external command, operable program, or batch file."
>>>> The
>>>> first time I got th
On Jun 11, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Kris Tilford wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2009, at 1:53 PM, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
>
>> Seems I'm not the only one having problems with Applejack 1.5 on
>> Leopard 10.5.X. Does anyone know of a workaround?
>
> The article you cite fr
On Jun 11, 2009, at 1:53 PM, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
> Seems I'm not the only one having problems with Applejack 1.5 on
> Leopard 10.5.X. Does anyone know of a workaround?
The article you cite from Sept. 2008, nearly a year ago, shows
AppleJack's Leopard version is 1.5.1
On Jun 10, 2009, at 11:32 AM, insightinmind wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 10, 2009, at 11:42 AM, insightinmind wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2009, at 11:30 PM, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
>>>
>>> Tried that. No luck. The actual wordage I get when
On Jun 10, 2009, at 11:32 AM, insightinmind wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 10, 2009, at 11:42 AM, insightinmind wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2009, at 11:30 PM, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
>>>
>>> Tried that. No luck. The actual wordage I get when
On Jun 10, 2009, at 11:42 AM, insightinmind wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2009, at 11:30 PM, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
>>
>> Tried that. No luck. The actual wordage I get when I key in
>> applejack from Single User Mode is, "applejack is not recognized
On Jun 9, 2009, at 11:30 PM, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
>
> Tried that. No luck. The actual wordage I get when I key in
> applejack from Single User Mode is, "applejack is not recognized as an
> internal or external command, operable program, or batch file." The
&
On Jun 9, 2009, at 11:34 PM, Paul Stamsen wrote:
>
> Previously, at 10:30 pm -0500 6/9/09, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
>>
>> Tried that. No luck. The actual wordage I get when I key in
>> applejack from Single User Mode is, "applejack is not recognized
>
Previously, at 10:30 pm -0500 6/9/09, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
>
> Tried that. No luck. The actual wordage I get when I key in
>applejack from Single User Mode is, "applejack is not recognized as an
>internal or external command, operable program, or batch fil
On Jun 9, 2009, at 10:23 PM, Paul Stamsen wrote:
>
> Previously, at 10:08 pm -0500 6/9/09, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
>> My bad. I should have said Single User Mode, not Safe Boot. I get a
>> bunch of yellow text on a black screen, but when I key in "applejack"
Previously, at 10:08 pm -0500 6/9/09, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
>My bad. I should have said Single User Mode, not Safe Boot. I get a
>bunch of yellow text on a black screen, but when I key in "applejack"
>it tells me it can't be found.
Try reinstalling it. I
On Jun 9, 2009, at 1:11 PM, insightinmind wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2009, at 1:57 PM, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
>
>>
>> AppleJack will not run from safe boot or terminal. I've followed the
>> instructions to the letter, but since installing 10.5.7 it'
On Jun 9, 2009, at 1:57 PM, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
>
> AppleJack will not run from safe boot or terminal. I've followed the
> instructions to the letter, but since installing 10.5.7 it's non-
> functioning. Any suggestions, other than reinstalling, which I have
&g
On Jun 9, 1:57 pm, "George R. Hozendorf" wrote:
> AppleJack will not run from safe boot or terminal. I've followed the
> instructions to the letter, but since installing 10.5.7 it's non-
> functioning. Any suggestions, other than reinstalling, which I have
&
At 12:57 PM -0500 6/9/2009, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
>AppleJack will not run from safe boot or terminal.
As expected. AppleJack *requires* Single-User Mode. Boot with cmd-S
held down.
- Dan.
--
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Ea
AppleJack will not run from safe boot or terminal. I've followed the
instructions to the letter, but since installing 10.5.7 it's non-
functioning. Any suggestions, other than reinstalling, which I have
done.
George
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You rec
> From: Bruce Johnson
> On May 28, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Jonas Lopez wrote:
>>
>> It has ran for several years with no problems.
>>
>> Select OS9 on the 10.4 disk and start up in nine. Run DW ON THE
>> OS9+10.2.8 partition. Works just fine.
>>
>> When done, change to OS9+10.2 as the start up.
>>
>> R
On May 28, 2009, at 7:11 PM, tonycd wrote:
> 3.0 is not trustworthy with OS X 10.4.11, but 3.0.3 is.
I agree totally. I've had systems trashed by old versions of DW, but
the "correct" version almost never has problems unless the HD is bad
(meaning physically bad).
One small exception here -
Which is why my original suggestion may have been germane to his
problem.
3.0 is not trustworthy with OS X 10.4.11, but 3.0.3 is.
On May 28, 3:46 pm, Bruce Johnson
wrote:
> On May 28, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Jonas Lopez wrote:
>
>
> The solution is to by a modern version of Disk Earrior, which com
Run DW from OS9 on the OS9+10.4 disk.
You are extremely lucky. Running an OS 9 directory repair program cam
completely screw up an OS X volume.
>
> This has worked for some 5 years, BUT IT IS only in the last few
> months, after I experimented and ran Applejack did the problem arise
> From: Bruce Johnson
> Subject: Re: DiskWarrior will not run after Applejack ran.
> To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 9:47 AM
>
>
> On May 27, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Jonas Lopez wrote:
>
> >
> > In answer to your question:
> &g
On May 27, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Jonas Lopez wrote:
>
> In answer to your question:
>
> Since DiskWarrior runs only in OS 9,
BZZZ!!!
You're using the wrong version of Diskwarrior, then. Diskwarrior for
OS X runs in OS X.
--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Informatio
run it for sure, but if I am not busy, I will
sometimes run it on a lower percentage.
This has been my general monthly maintenance procedure for several years with
the same DiskWarrior version!
BUT, it is only in the last few months that I have ventured to use Applejack,
especially because it
On 5/27/09 12:28 PM, "Jonas Lopez" Broadcast into the
ether:
>
> Have others had same experience with Applejack?
I have used applejack on hundreds of machines (timesaver just to hit "a")
and never heard of your problem. And I am an Apple Service Technician. I
usua
REPORTED ALL FIXED.
Run it again until it finds no errors.
>
> Again ran Disk Warrior with the same reports of (in step 4, halts)
> with errors 2156 and 2180.
Contact Alsoft about this.
>
> Have others had same experience with Applejack?
No, I haven't but then, I'
) with errors
2156 and 2180.
Again, I remind that this same version of DW has been run from OS 9 for years
with no problems - it fixes all out of orders in both OS9 and 10.2.8 as they
both reside on the same partition. BUT since using AppleJack, DiskWarrior will
NOT RUN.
Have others had same
f I had to guess, probably the former.)
This is all useful information, but not germane to Jonas' problem.
He did the following:
ran DiskWarrior on the system. Successful, meaning no version problems.
ran Applejack on the same system. Successful.
ran DiskWarrior again on the same system, DW e
I have 10.4.11 on a Power Mac. I had Disk Warrior 3, and they'll let
you upgrade online to 3.0.3 in a way that lets you burn a physical
disk for your own use. (I don't remember whether it's cheap or free.
If I had to guess, probably the former.)
--Tony
--~--~-~--~~~---
On 5/26/09 12:58 PM, "Kris Tilford" Broadcast into the
ether:
>
> On May 26, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>
>> It could just be a bug in DiskWarrior...
>
> If you use an older version of DiskWarrior on a newer OS version
> you'll get error messages. As I recall, for Tiger 10.4.11 yo
On May 26, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
> It could just be a bug in DiskWarrior...
If you use an older version of DiskWarrior on a newer OS version
you'll get error messages. As I recall, for Tiger 10.4.11 you needed
at least DiskWarrior 3.0.3 rev.39 (the final v.3 series update) o
On May 26, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Jonas Lopez wrote:
>
> DiskWarrior will not run after Applejack ran.
>
> I suspected this problem, so I did a test: Ran DiskWarrior on disk
> with 10.4 and 9.2. It ran just fine.
>
> Ran Applejack in safe mode. Did all 5 features; all ran w
DiskWarrior will not run after Applejack ran.
I suspected this problem, so I did a test: Ran DiskWarrior on disk with 10.4
and 9.2. It ran just fine.
Ran Applejack in safe mode. Did all 5 features; all ran well. Some changes
reported, but was able to fix disk.
As acid test, I then ran
At 3:16 PM -0800 2/22/2009, Jonas Lopez wrote:
>Yes there is a Readme with Applejack and in it is the following:
>"Running this script while logged in as a user can crash your system"
>
>So the question still is; HOW TO LOG OUT?
You are mis-interpreting it.
You cannot ru
> On Feb 22, 9:56 am, Jonas Lopez wrote:
>> Problem with Applejack instructions
I used Applejack to test my RAM.
I never log in either, I am the only user on my machine.
All I did was Shut Down, then Start up using Cmd-S.
The rest was pretty automatic.
No problems.
Good luck
gifutiger wrote:
> Greetings ( + )!( + )
>
> If the instruction that come with the applejack application are not
> understandable then I would recommend that you trash the program and
> not attempt to run it under any circumstance.
>
> Best regards,
>
> - Harry -
&g
Greetings ( + )!( + )
If the instruction that come with the applejack application are not
understandable then I would recommend that you trash the program and
not attempt to run it under any circumstance.
Best regards,
- Harry -
On Feb 22, 9:56 am, Jonas Lopez wrote:
> Problem w
On Feb 22, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Jonas Lopez wrote:
>
> Yes there is a Readme with Applejack and in it is the following:
> "Running this script while logged in as a user can crash your system"
>
> So the question still is; HOW TO LOG OUT?
>
> The last item
Earlier, at 3:16 pm -0800 2/22/09, Jonas Lopez wrote:
>Yes there is a Readme with Applejack and in it is the
>following:
>"Running this script while logged in as a user can
>crash your system"
>
>So the question still is; HOW TO LOG OUT?
>
>The last item on the A
Yes there is a Readme with Applejack and in it is the following:
"Running this script while logged in as a user can crash your system"
So the question still is; HOW TO LOG OUT?
The last item on the Apple menu is
LOG OUT.
Question is:
Are we REQUIRED to use this to quit then start
Earlier, at 1:37 pm -0600 2/22/09, Eric Volker wrote:
>I'm not sure about those instructions, but the way
>I've always used
>AppleJack is to do a complete Shutdown from the Apple
>Menu. You would
>then start your Mac back up. After the startup chime,
>hold down CMD-S
At 1:37 PM -0600 2/22/2009, Eric Volker wrote:
>I'm not sure about those instructions, but the way I've always used
>AppleJack is to do a complete Shutdown from the Apple Menu. You would
>then start your Mac back up. After the startup chime, hold down CMD-S
>until a black
On Feb 22, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Jonas Lopez wrote:
>
> Problem with Applejack instructions
>
> I want to use this and can read and understand, but as is the case
> here, the writer assumes you know more than we do and then tells us
> of a danger, so here is the problem:
At 9:56 AM -0800 2/22/2009, Jonas Lopez wrote:
>Problem with Applejack instructions
>
>I want to use this and can read and understand, but as is the case
>here, the writer assumes you know more than we do and then tells us
>of a danger, so here is the problem:
>
>QUIT
Problem with Applejack instructions
I want to use this and can read and understand, but as is the case here, the
writer assumes you know more than we do and then tells us of a danger, so here
is the problem:
QUIT 1: I am a user and am logged in, when I am done with the computer, I use
the
Does anyone know what the following Applejack errors mean?
bootstrap lookup
waiting for IOkit to quiesce
SC_callback (1102) couldn't send event
bsd8021_event_callback couldn't send event
Cheers,
Brian
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message b
52 matches
Mail list logo
