Hello!
I reinstalled a fresh 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 on my Cube and naturally I started
updating the installations soon after. 10.2 is now the most recent 10.2.8 with
all security updates supplied by Software Update, but I had to use my
previously downloaded and offline stored installation packages
On Jul 11, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
Hello!
I reinstalled a fresh 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 on my Cube and naturally
I started
updating the installations soon after. 10.2 is now the most recent
10.2.8 with
all security updates supplied by Software Update, but I had to use my
pr
That is pretty normal. Mac OS 10.2 was released almost exactly one DECADE
ago. The Software Update servers usually only hold updates from the last
few years. After that you have to navigate to Apple and do it manually. It
is a huge burden on a company to support things back over a decade, so I
am j
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
Date:Wednesday, 11. July 2012
From:Kyle Hansen
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> That is pretty normal. Mac OS 10.2 was released almost exactly one DECADE
> ago. The Software Update servers usually onl
Shouldn't 10.4 run on a Cube? I'm certain that software update has those.
-- --
Illirik Smirnov
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Kyle Hansen wrote:
> That is pretty normal. Mac OS 10.2 was released almost exactly one DECADE
> ago. The Software Update servers usually only hold updates from the
> Shouldn't 10.4 run on a Cube? I'm certain that software update has those.
10.4 runs just fine on a Cube.
--
personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com
-- Neckties strangle clear t
Well let's jet say that I personally would not want to have to have a
coded server responding to thousands of requests a day to compile a list
of installed software on a client that is accessing it and then making it
available to hundreds of requests at any given moment to download a
variety of loc
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
Date:Wednesday, 11. July 2012
From:Kyle Hansen
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> Well let's jet say that I personally would not want to have to have a
> coded server responding to thousands of req
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
Date:Wednesday, 11. July 2012
From:Cameron Kaiser
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> > Shouldn't 10.4 run on a Cube? I'm certain that software update has those.
>
> 10.4 runs just fine o
On Jul 11, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
> Anyone else having problem with Software Update?
I am on multiple Macs and Wintel machines. Says its checking then just blips
out and leaves a blank window telling you the following updates are available.
Not enough time passed to complet
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
Date:Wednesday, 11. July 2012
From:Jason Brown
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> On Jul 11, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
> > Anyone else having problem with Software Update?
>
> I
The OP stated that he had 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 loaded in his first sentence.
Jerry
On 07/11/12 12:25 PM, Illirik Smirnov wrote:
> Shouldn't 10.4 run on a Cube? I'm certain that software update has those.
> -- --
> Illirik Smirnov
>
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are a member
I would put down money that the traffic from all the i-devices alone
greatly exceeds the bandwidth of all of the MacOS and Mac OS X updates.
Jerry
On 07/11/12 12:36 PM, Kyle Hansen wrote:
> Well let's jet say that I personally would not want to have to have a
> coded server responding to thousan
ls and check? I also might have
it on my old iPod too?
-Original Message-
>From: Mac User #330250
>Sent: Jul 11, 2012 12:56 PM
>To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
>Subject: Updates for Mac OS X?
>
>Hello!
>
>I reinstalled a fresh 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 on my Cube
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
Date:Thursday, 12. July 2012
From:Richard Gerome
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> I used to go to Apple's archives to get the combo updates... I used to
> also save them on my desktop and I
s.com
>Subject: Updates for Mac OS X?
>
>Hello!
>
>I reinstalled a fresh 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 on my Cube and naturally I started
>updating the installations soon after. 10.2 is now the most recent 10.2.8 with
>all security updates supplied by Software Update, but I had to
On 7/11/12 2:21 PM, Kyle Hansen at wrote:
> That is pretty normal. Mac OS 10.2 was released almost exactly one DECADE
> ago. The Software Update servers usually only hold updates from the last
> few years. After that you have to navigate to Apple and do it manually. It
> is a huge burden on a com
On 7/12/12 12:02 AM, Richard Gerome at wrote:
>
> I used to go to Apple's archives to get the combo updates... I used to
> also save them on my desktop and I might have Jaguar somewhere and I maybe
> could email it to you? I don't have Panther... I think Tiger is still
> available on Apple'
On 7/13/12 4:13 PM, Koralatov at wrote:
> It isn't much of a burden at all, but Apple has made it pretty clear over
> the last couple of years that they *really* don't care about legacy
> machines.
Long are gone the times when a Mac OS version (7.5.5) could run from a Plus
to a multiprocessed 9
> On 18/07/2012, at 4:41 PM, MaGioZal wrote:
>
> Long are gone the times when a Mac OS version (7.5.5) could run from a Plus
> to a multiprocessed 9600 machine... And this was used as selling point in
> "Why Mac?" brochures!
>
> But Steve Jobs, despite saving, ressurecting and rebranding Apple,
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: [G3-5]Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
Date:Wednesday, 18. July 2012
From:MaGioZal
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> The strange thing is that up until this year (I had to re-install the OS in
> this HD) you could use Software Upd
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: [G3-5]Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
Date:Wednesday, 18. July 2012
From:Brian Christmas
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> And I personally wouldn't have it any other way. The main reason we're
> going through an upheav
> Question: Why did Apple remove Classic support from Mac OS X 10.5? The two
> architectures (PowerPC and Intel) are different anyway:
I fully agree that dropping Classic in Leopard was absolutely arbitrary on
Apple's part. In fairness, Classic requires significant hacks to the kernel
and low-lev
On 7/18/12 4:17 AM, Brian Christmas at wrote:
> I'd rather the existing situation than be stuck on Classic OS 9.2.2 forever
> though. Power to the people still using it, but the world moves on. Even OS X
> will disappear one day, and it will be exciting to see the OS that will
> replace it!
But
.
Thanks for any comments. I would love to have Server 1.2 loaded on my Cube.
Jerry
On 07/11/12 12:54 PM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
> -- Original message --
> Subject: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
> Date:Wednesday, 11. July 2012
> From:Cameron Kaiser
> To:
-- Original message --
Subject: Mac OS X Server 1.2 - WAS: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
Date:Thursday, 12. July 2012
From:Jerry
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> If you have successfully got Mac OS X server 1.2 loaded on your cube,
> please share how you
helf. I need to get
motivated again, and come up with plan C !
Jerry
On 07/12/12 11:41 AM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
> -- Original message --
> Subject: Mac OS X Server 1.2 - WAS::::: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
> Date:Thursday, 12. July 2012
> From:Jerry
>
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Mac OS X Server 1.2 - WAS: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
Date:Friday, 13. July 2012
From:Jerry
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> I really haven't tried anything exotic to make this work. When Apple
> announced 10
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Mac OS X Server 1.2 - WAS: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
Date:Friday, 13. July 2012
From:Jerry
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> In April 2011, I found a legal copy of OS X Server 1.2 server on
> Amazon.com, of all plac
am missing something else.
Jerry
On 07/19/12 01:13 PM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
> -- Original message --
> Subject: Re: Mac OS X Server 1.2 - WAS: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
> Date:Friday, 13. July 2012
> From:Jerry
> To: g3-5-list@googlegrou
OS X Server 1.2 - WAS::::: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
>Date:Friday, 13. July 2012
>From:Jerry
>To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
>
>> In April 2011, I found a legal copy of OS X Server 1.2 server on
>> Amazon.com, of all places. I tried a few things to make it work,
they can't
boot OS 9?
On 7/19/12 11:13 AM, "Mac User #330250" wrote:
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Mac OS X Server 1.2 - WAS::::: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
Date:Friday, 13. July 2012
From:Jerry
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
In April 2011,
I am aware of that. But he just said OS 9. I was unaware he meant OS 9.0
specifically.
===
Kyle H. Hansen
Apple Certified Desktop Technician (ACDT)
Apple Certified Portable Technician (ACPT)
Apple Certified System Administrator (ACSA)
Mic
A quick google search came up with this result. I read through it and it
makes sense as to why it is not working and how to make it work. I do
not have a cube to test this on however, anyone wanna donate one to the
cause? :P Hopefully this helps ya. :)
http://www.mulle-kybernetik.com/techinfos/
I'm confused! Why did you reply to a completely different topic,
changing subject
On 7/19/12 1:13 PM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Mac OS X Server 1.2 - WAS: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
Date:Friday, 13. July 2012
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Mac OS X Server 1.2 - WAS: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
Date:Friday, 20. July 2012
From:Charles Lenington
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> I'm confused! Why did you reply to a completely different topic,
> chang
OS X Server 1.2 - WAS: Re: Updates for Mac OS X?
>
>I'm confused! Why did you reply to a completely different topic,
>changing subject
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On 7/19/12 1:13 PM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
>> -- Original message --
>&
37 matches
Mail list logo
