onday, December 12, 2011 10:01 AM
To: Gamers Discussion list
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated
Lone Wolf
Hi Thomas,
I personally are also not against new technologies or new features in future
Windows operating systems or other programs.
But I'd like t
amers Discussion list
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated
Lone Wolf
Hi Thomas,
I personally are also not against new technologies or new features in future
Windows operating systems or other programs.
But I'd like to adress a few points as well.
If a compan
Shaun, you said:
"We must remember that all the interfaces, reader, etc are kernal
based, no doubt we will have other issues with touch."
What exactly do you mean by this statement? If I decode this
correctly, do you imply that all screen readers need to install hooks
into the windows kernel that
Hi Thomas,
I am aware of this, but I am seriously questioning some of theese facts.
Why do I have to use my web browser for dealing with E-Mails, when I have
any Mail application installed, whether it is from MS or someone else.
I know a friend and one of her mail accounts was with the German par
t is the presence of the Lord."
- Original Message - From: "Thomas Ward"
To: "Gamers Discussion list"
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 1:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an
updated Lone Wolf
Hi ?Charles,
Well, let me ans
How do you expect to use the hardware, and incase you didn't know.
All versions of ops need drivers to run the hardware.
At 04:25 AM 12/13/2011, you wrote:
sound, we need drivers with everything, though now ms have generic
drivers you think they would have loaded those for the installs now.
At
sound, we need drivers with everything, though now ms have generic
drivers you think they would have loaded those for the installs now.
At 05:01 p.m. 12/12/2011 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I personally are also not against new technologies or new features
in future Windows operating systems or
uot;
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 1:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an
updated Lone Wolf
Hi ?Charles,
Well, let me answer your question with a question. How do you expect
them to make money if they don't continually release upgrades?
It sounds to
Hi trouble.
Hmmm this is quite lively.
In responce to the touch issue, as long as we can get a keyboard of
sorts on a system I am all for touch, maybe have speech rec to.
Ofcause the fact with apple that you have different chalenges is
something to think about though I have heard users touch and
Hi Michael,
While I take your point just keep in mind here Microsoft's aim of
Windows 7 was to make the operating system more stable, streamline the
install, and basically remove a bunch of extra apps and components
they felt were unecessary. That's why a lot of older apps were removed
from the in
gt; in that one, though.
>
> ---
> "Security is not the absence of danger. It is the presence of the Lord."
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Thomas Ward"
> To: "Gamers Discussion list"
> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 1:18 AM
> Subject
Hi Thomas,
Yes, windows programs get new features and yes, it is up to you to decide if
you want to use them or not...
But let me ask you something just as an example.
Do you know what the difference between Windows Movie Maker and Windows Live
Movie Maker is?
As far as I am informed the Window
Hi Thomas,
I personally are also not against new technologies or new features in future
Windows operating systems or other programs.
But I'd like to adress a few points as well.
If a company wants to improove their software, then this is often good for
all users and not because security might b
s not the absence of danger. It is the presence of the Lord."
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Ward"
To: "Gamers Discussion list"
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 1:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated
Lone Wolf
Hi
The next move for screen readers should be touch. Apple already makes
use of this and I use it a lot. i go through twice as much email as i
can with jaws and lets not forget moving around on the computer with
just my finger and no spoken commands. The games that can be explored
by touch are goi
n technology when it is prudent to do so and not be afraid
> of change.
>
> Chris Bartlett
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: gamers-boun...@audyssey.org [mailto:gamers-boun...@audyssey.org] On
> Behalf Of Charles Rivard
> Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 5:32 PM
&
Hi ?Charles,
Well, let me answer your question with a question. How do you expect
them to make money if they don't continually release upgrades?
It sounds to me like your question is along the lines of "if it ain't
broke don't fix it." While it might seem like you are paying money to
do the same
-boun...@audyssey.org [mailto:gamers-boun...@audyssey.org] On
Behalf Of shaun everiss
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 9:21 PM
To: Gamers Discussion list
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated
Lone Wolf
You can blame the game nuts for that.
The sighted like
You can blame the game nuts for that.
The sighted like using powerfull games which need that power.
As for upgrades all stuff needs to be upgraded, storage hardware, security etc.
At 04:32 p.m. 11/12/2011 -0600, you wrote:
Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system and
progra
Charles Rivard
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 5:32 PM
To: Gamers Discussion list
Subject: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone
Wolf
Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system and
programs, making more power hogs, making us buy more powerful computer
..@audyssey.org [mailto:gamers-boun...@audyssey.org] On
Behalf Of Charles Rivard
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 5:32 PM
To: Gamers Discussion list
Subject: [Audyssey] my beef about Microsoft - Re: plans for an updated Lone
Wolf
Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system a
While money is one motivating factor, one reason you can't just stop
once you get a system that works is that, with something as complex as
an operating system and the fallibility of programmers, it's almost
impossible to get a system that does exactly what you want. Any
operating system meant for
Do they really have to continually upgrade the operating system and
programs, making more power hogs, making us buy more powerful computers to
do the same tasks we were previously doing but having to use more powerful
processors and use more of the resources to do those tasks? Why can't they
j
23 matches
Mail list logo
