RE: [Ganglia-developers] infoworld

Yes, I really must say you have done a great job, and I am pushing Ganglia pretty hard - basic stats @ 5 second polling interval, 30 clusters and 2,500 windows hosts to 1 Ganglia Server. And thank you to the people who are still working on the code - I know you have all helped me big time. - Ric

[Ganglia-developers] infoworld short write-up on ganglia

guys- if you visit you'll see the short write-up highlighting ganglia there. the full link is weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2006/03/ open_source_man.html>. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://massie.us

Re: [Ganglia-developers] infoworld

congrats to the team. ganglia has grown way beyond my initial code base thanks to all the work of the people on this list (and others). it's pretty amazing to see how it has come to take on a life of it's own. you guys rock. your sweat and ideas keep us moving along. thanks -matt On M

RE: [Ganglia-developers] infoworld

Congrats Matt! Cheers, Bernard > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of matt massie > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 10:31 > To: Ganglia Developers > Subject: [Ganglia-developers] infoworld > > guys- > > it looks like infoworld is doin

[Ganglia-developers] infoworld

guys- it looks like infoworld is doing a writeup on ganglia. i was contacted for a phone interview and i've been bouncing the emails back and forth with them. they are doing a series of articles on open source management tools to watch for enterprise. ganglia is one of 'em. i'll post

Re: Shipping 3rd party sources? [Re: [Ganglia-developers] BuildRequires: rrdtool-devel]

On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 03:43:13AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > Bernard, > So, my question is: is it still a good idea to ship 3rd party stuff? > On Linux, you usually have that stuff installed (or can get a RPM). On > the other platforms you can always get the code from somewhere else > easil

Re: [Ganglia-developers] using --base 1024 in graphs

Hi chuck, what would you suggest instead? 1000? Cheers Martin --- Chuck Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In graph.php, it is arguably incorrect to use "--base 1024" for the > 'network_report'. It is fairly clearly counter-intuitive to use > "--base > 1024" for the 'packet_report'. > >

[Ganglia-developers] Re: a few questions [WAS: ganglia-3.0.3]

Hi Paul, as for the "mcast_if" stuff, there seems to be some handling in "lib/apr_net.c" routine "mcast_join". But glancing over the code it "feels" fishy. Maybe Matt can have a look. Cheers Martin --- Paul Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > At the risk of asking some stupid, I've a

Shipping 3rd party sources? [Re: [Ganglia-developers] BuildRequires: rrdtool-devel]

Bernard, not from my side. Can you restrict that to the "gmetad" rpm only? AFAIK, rrd-devel is only needed there. In any case, this open up again the question of shipping 3rd party code together with the sources. We do it for "apr", "confuse" and "expat", but we don't for rrdtools. Not really c

Re: [Ganglia-developers] multiple incompatible versions of 'libtool'.

Chuck, because we ship "original" versions of some 3rd paty code like "apr", "confuse" and "expat". Only top-level and "libmetrics" are native gmond. Has this caused actual problems? If I use the same command on a "configured" tree on my FC4 system, all seems to point to the correct "sed" locat

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Truncated XML again

Richard, sure. That needs to be fixed. Matt has checked in a better solution than the loop code. Actually, with Matts changes, all EAGAIN problems should be fixed. Q: do you see this behaviour with the current CVS code? That has the fix since March 18th. If yes, Matt needs to know. Cheers Mart

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gmetric truncated output fix

Hi Matt, It seems to work great now, thanks. I've updated the bugzilla comments. Kind regards, - Ramon. matt massie wrote: guys- i tracked down what was causing the gmetric output in gmond to be truncated. here is a part of the patch...