On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:05:32PM -0800, Bernard Li wrote:
Can you please test this tarball bootstrapped on Fedora 9.
It works, but would invalidate all testing that was done for 3.1.3
and the original 3.1.4.
If it works I will replace the original tarball with this:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 11:09:40PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I note Paul is using gcc, whereas I'm building and testing with Sun
Studio on the OpenCSW build farm - Sun's compiler is now a free
download, and it is used to build all the CSW libraries (including those
used by Ganglia), so
Hi Paul:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Paul Sobey bud...@the-annexe.net wrote:
Quick note to let you know 3.1.4 beta builds fine without Python support
using gcc 4.4.1/Solaris ld (and the -std=gnu99 CFLAG). I'll continue to
monitor the users list for hints as to how to build with python
Bernard Li wrote:
Hi Carlo:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
care...@sajinet.com.pe wrote:
Ideally, which platform is used to bootstrap shouldn't be relevant though
and IMHO we should be instead aiming to the latest versions of the autotools
(either
Hi Daniel:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
I guess it needs to be tried - how far back to we want/need to maintain
compatibility? I need to support RHEL3 for instance.
However, if it works, I'm all for using the new tools to bootstrap, and I'm
Bernard Li wrote:
Hi Paul:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Paul Sobey bud...@the-annexe.net wrote:
Quick note to let you know 3.1.4 beta builds fine without Python support
using gcc 4.4.1/Solaris ld (and the -std=gnu99 CFLAG). I'll continue to
monitor the users list for hints as to
Paul:
Can you please try this Ganglia tarball which I built on Fedora 9?
http://ganglia.info/testing/bootstrapped_on_fedora9/ganglia-3.1.4.tar.gz
Thanks,
Bernard
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
care...@sajinet.com.pe wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:52:52AM
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:52:52AM +, Paul Sobey wrote:
/usr/include/sys/feature_tests.h:336:2: error: #error Compiler or options
invalid; UNIX 03 and POSIX.1-2001 applications require the use of
c99
make[2]: *** [getopt1.o] Error 1
Googling leads me to try compiling with
Hi Carlo:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
care...@sajinet.com.pe wrote:
this is a bug on the autoconf from CentOS 4 which is used to build the
release packages, therefore you can also workaround the issue by
rebootstrapping the package or making your own with a
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 04:44:59PM +, Paul Sobey wrote:
I note from the Makefile Daniel posted:
# Depends: some issues exist getting the Python support working on
Solaris,
# Ganglia's configure.in needs to be further enhanced for this to work
I think this is a CSW specific problem, as
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 04:44:59PM +, Paul Sobey wrote:
I note from the Makefile Daniel posted:
# Depends: some issues exist getting the Python support working on
Solaris,
# Ganglia's configure.in needs to be further enhanced for this to work
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 08:42:05PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 04:44:59PM +, Paul Sobey wrote:
I note from the Makefile Daniel posted:
# Depends: some issues exist getting the Python support working on
Solaris,
#
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 08:42:05PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 04:44:59PM +, Paul Sobey wrote:
I note from the Makefile Daniel posted:
# Depends: some issues exist getting
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:10:14PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
care...@sajinet.com.pe wrote:
this is a bug on the autoconf from CentOS 4 which is used to build the
release packages, therefore you can also workaround the issue by
Hi Carlo:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
care...@sajinet.com.pe wrote:
Ideally, which platform is used to bootstrap shouldn't be relevant though
and IMHO we should be instead aiming to the latest versions of the autotools
(either installed by hand or provided as
Hi Paul:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Paul Sobey bud...@the-annexe.net wrote:
We try to build most things internally. There are good reasons which I'll
gladly discuss with you off-list if you'd like, but suffice to say it would
be useful to be able to compile Ganglia ourselves. I have no
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 04:51:33PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
Ganglia 3.1.4 is ready for testing at:
http://ganglia.info/testing/
DragonFlyBSD fails to build (tested with 2.4.0 32bit).
not a regression (a system header problem which also affects
3.1.2) and there are some trivial unrelated
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 04:51:33PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
Ganglia 3.1.4 is ready for testing at:
http://ganglia.info/testing/
DragonFlyBSD fails to build (tested with 2.4.0 32bit).
not a regression (a system header problem which also affects
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:15:15AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
DragonFlyBSD fails to build (tested with 2.4.0 32bit).
how do you propose we avoid missing stuff like this in future?
Not sure if this can be avoided, but there might be some things we could
do
Bernard Li wrote:
Hi Paul:
Have you tried these OpenCSW packages:
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html
Or is there a specific reason why you would want to build Ganglia yourself?
Also see:
scripts/build-solaris.sh (I added this recently on 3.1)
and
20 matches
Mail list logo
