Re: [Ganglia-developers] Investigating feasibility of moving repo to Github

2011-07-12 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:28:18PM -0400, Vladimir Vuksan wrote: Any thoughts on why we shouldn't make the Github our primary repository ? as it was explained long time ago when I proposed the same and were rejected we will also need to

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Investigating feasibility of moving repo to Github

2011-07-12 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Jesse Becker wrote: the full history in svn anyway, as it was only recently that metadata was added for keeping track of the merges. And I've said before that keeping SVN around, read-only, is perfectly fine. I still have no objections to migrating to git, and think

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Investigating feasibility of moving repo to Github

2011-07-11 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:28:18PM -0400, Vladimir Vuksan wrote: Any thoughts on why we shouldn't make the Github our primary repository ? as it was explained long time ago when I proposed the same and were rejected we will also need to change our scripts so that they will be able to work

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Investigating feasibility of moving repo to Github

2011-07-11 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 09:27:28PM -0400, Jesse Becker wrote: My only concern is with the import process itself. any import process that I know of from svn to git, should at least preserve the history, what is your concern specifically here? There is a lot of important metadata in the

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Investigating feasibility of moving repo to Github

2011-07-11 Thread Jesse Becker
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:42, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon care...@sajinet.com.pe wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 09:27:28PM -0400, Jesse Becker wrote: My only concern is with the import process itself. any import process that I know of from svn to git, should at least preserve the history,

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Investigating feasibility of moving repo to Github

2011-07-11 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 01:05:47PM -0400, Jesse Becker wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:42, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon care...@sajinet.com.pe wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 09:27:28PM -0400, Jesse Becker wrote: I believe that this should be completely preserved, either directly within

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Investigating feasibility of moving repo to Github

2011-07-11 Thread Jesse Becker
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 06:22:47PM -0400, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 01:05:47PM -0400, Jesse Becker wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:42, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon care...@sajinet.com.pe wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 09:27:28PM -0400, Jesse Becker wrote: I

[Ganglia-developers] Investigating feasibility of moving repo to Github

2011-07-10 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
As most know couple months ago we created a number of repositories on Github for people to contribute their gmetric scripts, python modules etc. This has been a huge success as we received tons of good contributions. We have had a number of conversations on #ganglia Freenode channel about

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Investigating feasibility of moving repo to Github

2011-07-10 Thread Alex Dean
On Jul 10, 2011, at 9:28 PM, Vladimir Vuksan wrote: I have made an import of the monitor-core trunk into Github +1. I'm all for it. alex -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Investigating feasibility of moving repo to Github

2011-07-10 Thread Jesse Becker
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 16:28, Vladimir Vuksan vli...@veus.hr wrote: As most know couple months ago we created a number of repositories on Github for people to contribute their gmetric scripts, python modules etc. This has been a huge success as we received tons of good contributions. We have