Hello,
I would like to know if there is a way to show events added by api to
the aggregated cluster view.
The objective is to see if the load of a machine was influenced by a
deploy of code.
Thanks for the help
Simão Fontes
--
Arquivo da Web Portuguesa | FCCN
Av. do Brasil, n.º 101
1700-066 L
Well, from this project's standpoint I wish I had access to a big
installation to test on still, but I don't (and I'm happy to be doing what
I'm doing).
The scalability issue I've seen happened in a grid with a few dozen
clusters; each cluster had a few dozen nodes in it, and we monitored a
couple
Hi Rick:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Rick Cobb wrote:
> On your idea, Bernard -- I don't think it would necessarily require gmond
You're right, I meant to say gmetad... it was late last night :)
> changes. OTOH, I think it would require very interesting gmetad changes to
> do a good jo
Another wacky way to "solve" this is to layer Ganglias. I.e., write an
independent script which polls the gmetad for its XML, projects the data as
if, e.g., every LPAR is a host, and posts that to an independent gmond using
gmetric or its modern equivalents. Then point a new gmetad instance at th
Hi Michael:
I don't think the current frontend code supports what you want without
some major hacking. The frontend expects the user to view the "grid"
as multiple clusters and the "cluster" as multiple hosts.
A common feature request is to have hosts arbitrarily cluster/group
based on different
I have a question regarding the PHP web code of Ganglia:
My setup looks like that:
* I have one Grid and several Clusters.
* Each Cluster has between 10-250 nodes, all running on AIX LPARs
(but the question is independent of the OS).
* I have clustered on a logical level, i.e., not
Federico Sacerdoti wrote:
Since Matt is going to be indisposed for a while due to his new baby, I
will take this one.
:O!!!
Dang, more people I need to send shirts to this month. :P
We are definately planning to implement this idea, and I'm glad you see
the need for it. Matt's idea, which
On a (very) slightly less pie-in-the-sky note...
Has anyone considered the utility of being able to select a subset of
cluster/host/metric data from the metadaemon? In other words, you
send a command that limits display to values that have been updated in
the last 60 seconds, or a particular
It's also worth noting that there's no particular reason to avoid
developing other front-ends to Ganglia. If you'd rather build one your way
using a particular technology or library that better suits your needs, the
existing architecture makes it pretty easy for you to do so. Almost as if
it
Well there are a few reasons. I know only a cursory bit about xslt,
however, so let me know if I'm off base on any of these.
We chose PHP over XSLT because:
-PHP is faster, and more mature.
-Can handle CGI variables which keep state between different HTML views.
-Can read form data given by user
The Ganglia web frontend uses PHP to transform xml to html (I think). Why
was that method chosen instead of using PHP to make calls to xslt scripts to
do the transformation? Is there a belief that PHP is better than xsl for
coding xml to html transformations? Does the Ganglia web front end include
11 matches
Mail list logo
