RE: [Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2005-01-10 Thread Bernard Li
: Monday, January 10, 2005 5:06 > To: Adesanya, Adeyemi > Cc: Ganglia Developers > Subject: [Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? > (frustration...) > > i'm based in berkeley and i'd be happy to drop by and chat > with SLAC about ganglia... i'll be pre

[Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2005-01-10 Thread Matt Massie
i'm based in berkeley and i'd be happy to drop by and chat with SLAC about ganglia... i'll be pretty busy over the next few weeks but then my schedule should open. i remember someone on the list talking about building regular irc meetings for developers to just chat and catch up. something li

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2004-12-15 Thread Adeyemi Adesanya
Martin, I was under the impression that we were close to finalizing the new features/fixes for 2.5.8. Several of them have been floating around for a while and I really feel like the rug has been pulled from underneath me. Anyone who runs Ganglia on Solaris will know how I feel. When I realiz

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2004-12-15 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Hi, personally I also was a bit surprised about the move into 2.6.0. I would have liked to see a 2.5.8 with the few remaining bug-fixes and Solaris using "kstat". No metrics rearrangements (we could have added Linux/cpu_wio at the end of the list) and no fancy new confugation options. Not sure wh

[Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2004-12-14 Thread Joel Boutros
i too would be interested in a stable 2.5.x release. - joel

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2004-12-14 Thread Josh Durham
Well, I personally think you should continue your development on the next major version. 2.5.x is pretty stable. If someone wants to maintain it, I would think Matt would be glad to let someone support 2.5. I feel that if you spend alot of time maintaining 2.5, or bouncing back between 2.5

[Ganglia-developers] RE: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2004-12-14 Thread Adesanya, Adeyemi
Matt, I really want this to be a positive thing. Ganglia is a great tool with huge potential. ALL improvements are welcome but I'd like to see changes introduced in a regular cycle. BTW, you are more than welcome to come down to SLAC and give a presentation. You're based at Berkeley, right?

[Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2004-12-14 Thread Matt Massie
before i respond directly to adeyemi's frustration i'd like to hear from everyone in the group. don't hold any punches and feel free to express your feelings, ideas and frustrations especially if they include workable solutions. -matt -- PGP fingerprint 'A7C2 3C2F 8445 AD3C 135E F40B 242A 59