>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thu 17/08/2006 11:55
> To: Marcus Rueckert; Martin Knoblauch
> Cc: Adeyemi Adesanya; Bernard Li;
> ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] a
nglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse asshipped with ganglia
Marcus,
what is your timeframe for inclusion in 10.2?
Martin
--- Marcus Rueckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006-08-17 09:40:07 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> >
hanks,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 17/08/2006 09:40
To: Bernard Li; Jarod Wilson; Marcus Rueckert
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net; Adeyemi Adesanya
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse asshipped with ganglia
B
Marcus,
what is your timeframe for inclusion in 10.2?
Martin
--- Marcus Rueckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006-08-17 09:40:07 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > seems after all the noise the decision is to split off the
> externals.
> >
> > Your idea to push a last self-sufficient re
On 2006-08-17 09:40:07 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> seems after all the noise the decision is to split off the externals.
>
> Your idea to push a last self-sufficient release is a good one. I will
> do a 3.0.4-pre over the weekend. Not going to start with the 3.0.3.y
> madness :-)
>
> Mayb
On 2006-08-17 09:33:58 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> going to 1.2.7 would be great, because that would have the multicast
> stuff that Matt added on top of 0.9.x
>
> I actually tried it for 3.0.3, but it resulted in compilation errors
> and we wanted to get a release out. That is why we selec
gt; > Bernard
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wed 16/08/2006 15:30
> > To: Bernard Li; Jarod Wilson
> > Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Gangl
Marcus,
going to 1.2.7 would be great, because that would have the multicast
stuff that Matt added on top of 0.9.x
I actually tried it for 3.0.3, but it resulted in compilation errors
and we wanted to get a release out. That is why we selected 0.9.7.
Maybe we should start looking at it again.
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 16:40 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> On 2006-08-17 10:20:16 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 16:11 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > > On 2006-08-17 09:55:38 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 15:46 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > >
On 2006-08-17 10:20:16 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 16:11 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > On 2006-08-17 09:55:38 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 15:46 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > > > hi,
> > > >
> > > > while we are looking into dependencies:
>
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 16:11 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> On 2006-08-17 09:55:38 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 15:46 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > while we are looking into dependencies:
> > > APR 1.x is out since quite some time and should solve many
On 2006-08-17 09:55:38 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 15:46 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > while we are looking into dependencies:
> > APR 1.x is out since quite some time and should solve many bugs.
> > is anyone working on that already?
>
> We're shipping apr
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 15:46 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> hi,
>
> while we are looking into dependencies:
> APR 1.x is out since quite some time and should solve many bugs.
> is anyone working on that already?
We're shipping apr 1.2.7 with Fedora Core 6 and RHEL5. FC5 shipped apr
1.2.2. Looks l
hi,
while we are looking into dependencies:
APR 1.x is out since quite some time and should solve many bugs.
is anyone working on that already?
another nice thing is that most old systems only ship apr0. so you can
easily provide addon packages with apr1 and the removing the intree
libraries mig
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 15:30 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> this is certainly not what I wanted to kick off ... If we go that way,
> what about:
>
> RHEL4/5
> CentOs
The newly-created Fedora Extras package for libconfuse can be rebuilt on
any of these platforms, apr and expat are already availa
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 03:52:12PM -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> Bernard,
>
> I am not saying: drop the idea. I am just asking: what do we win if,
> with the exception of expat, none of the external packages is widely
> available in the "right" version? Is it worth the effort?
So long as we'r
ce into our configure/build system to auto-detect this...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bernard
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wed 16/08/2006 15:30
> To: Bernard Li; Jarod Wilson
> Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.source
uto-detect this...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bernard
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wed 16/08/2006 15:30
> To: Bernard Li; Jarod Wilson
> Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] a
sage-
> From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wed 16/08/2006 15:30
> To: Bernard Li; Jarod Wilson
> Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse asshipped with ganglia
>
> Folks,
>
> this is
--- Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Looking a bit broader at www.rpmfind.net:
>
> apr/apr-devel: varies from 0.9.4 to 0.9.6 for RedHat and Mdk. No
> SuSE.
> In 3.0.3 we moved from 0.9.5 to 0.9.7, because that fixed bz #87. Is
> 0.9.6 enough? I don't know and I do not really w
..
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 16/08/2006 15:30
To: Bernard Li; Jarod Wilson
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse asshipped with ganglia
Folks,
this is certainl
; -Original Message-
> From: Jarod Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wed 16/08/2006 10:56
> To: Bernard Li
> Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse asshipped with
> ganglia
>
> On Wed, 200
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:50:19PM +0100, Stu Teasdale wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 04:18:46PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > Stu, how about for Debian...?
> >
> > From what I can see, its available in Debian repos.
> They're 2.5.x packages unfortunately. I have 3.0.3 packages, but a
> coui
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 21:50 +0100, Stu Teasdale wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 04:18:46PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > Stu, how about for Debian...?
> >
> > From what I can see, its available in Debian repos.
> They're 2.5.x packages unfortunately. I have 3.0.3 packages, but a
> couiple of
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 04:18:46PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > Stu, how about for Debian...?
>
> From what I can see, its available in Debian repos.
They're 2.5.x packages unfortunately. I have 3.0.3 packages, but a
couiple of outstanding issues (stopping libtool from spraying rpaths
around a
rs old).
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jarod Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wed 16/08/2006 10:56
> To: Bernard Li
> Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse asshipped with
> ganglia
>
> O
16/08/2006 10:56
To: Bernard Li
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse asshipped withganglia
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 10:43 -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> Says 404 for me...
Bah, what the heck, who broke the redirectors... Okay, full li
27 matches
Mail list logo
