Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping ganglia with modern autotool versions for release (was Re: Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing)

2009-11-03 Thread Matt Massie
There are two issues here: 1. The issue raised by Carlos and worked on by Bernard: what version of autotools to bootstrap ganglia with. Bootstrapping doesn't involve building code but rather generating the build environment (m4 macros and /bin/sh scripts). Once the tarball is created (with the a

Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping ganglia with modern autotool versions for release (was Re: Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing)

2009-11-03 Thread Jesse Becker
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 02:33, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:28:03PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: >> >> I have a Fedora 9 VM that I can use to bootstrap in the future -- >> would the autotools that come with that version work? > > something with libtool 2.2 probably bet

Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping ganglia with modern autotool versions for release (was Re: Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing)

2009-11-02 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:28:03PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: > > I have a Fedora 9 VM that I can use to bootstrap in the future -- > would the autotools that come with that version work? something with libtool 2.2 probably better, as well as something that is still getting updates (in case there a

Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping ganglia with modern autotool versions for release (was Re: Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing)

2009-10-30 Thread Matt Massie
I'm glad the two of you guys agree technically here and feel free enough to tease each other a bit :). I'm +1 on building our distro with the version of autotools that has the best overall platform support. Once the distro is created, end users shouldn't have to worry about bootstrapping ganglia

Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping ganglia with modern autotool versions for release (was Re: Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing)

2009-10-30 Thread Matt Massie
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Matt: > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Matt Massie wrote: > > > I'm +1 on building our distro with the version of autotools that has the > > best overall platform support. Once the distro is created, end users > > shouldn't have to w

Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping ganglia with modern autotool versions for release (was Re: Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing)

2009-10-30 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Matt: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Matt Massie wrote: > I'm +1 on building our distro with the version of autotools that has the > best overall platform support.  Once the distro is created, end users > shouldn't have to worry about bootstrapping ganglia themselves.  When you do > a 'mak

Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping ganglia with modern autotool versions for release (was Re: Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing)

2009-10-30 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Carlo: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > Curious about how a "backward compatible" tarball would be like, but if > by that you meant that you can use the resulting configure script and Yes! That is what I mean -- wow Carlo, you must be a mind reader! ;-)

[Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping ganglia with modern autotool versions for release (was Re: Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing)

2009-10-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
Trimming CC and changing Subject to reflect thread better On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 04:54:17PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon > wrote: > > > Ideally, which platform is used to bootstrap shouldn't be relevant though > > and IMHO we should be i