Hi Alex!
W dniu 28.06.2023 o 03:54, waffl3x pisze:
I want to preface this stating that I have little to no experience in compiler
development, I am only merely just getting into it. With that said, I have
messed around
with library design a fair amount, and this seems like something that could
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, 08:14 Rafał Pietrak via Gcc, wrote:
> Hi Alex!
>
> W dniu 28.06.2023 o 03:54, waffl3x pisze:
> > I want to preface this stating that I have little to no experience in
> compiler
> > development, I am only merely just getting into it. With that said, I
> have messed around
> >
Hi Andrew,
On a Microsoft Windows target the following (placed inside a function of
course) will only work correctly if volatile is specified in the basic asm
block (or if the attached patch was applied to gcc):
asm ("1:" "\n"
"\t" ".seh_handler __C_specific_handler, @except" "\n"
>This is from just one source file, which otherwise is "plain C". If I
>was to put it into a library that use "asm tweaked fancy pointers", a
>portable fragment of code becomes "target dedicated" - this is undesired.
I sympathize with your desire to not lock your codebase to a particular
target, I
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:32 AM Julian Waters wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On a Microsoft Windows target the following (placed inside a function of
> course) will only work correctly if volatile is specified in the basic asm
> block (or if the attached patch was applied to gcc):
These inline-asm
Hi Jonathan,
W dniu 28.06.2023 o 09:31, Jonathan Wakely pisze:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, 08:14 Rafał Pietrak via Gcc,
[-]
how it looks like. I have a lot of code like this scattered around:
---
y->next = NULL;
Hi Alex,
W dniu 28.06.2023 o 09:34, waffl3x pisze:
[--]
---
y->next = NULL;
if (our) { out->next = a;
for (y = t->HD; y && y->next; y = y->next)
if (y) y->next = a;
fit-
I have some random questions concerning types in the GIMPLE IR that I
would appreciate some clarification on.
Type safety
---
Some transformations treat 1-bit types as a synonym of _Bool and mix the
types in expressions, such as:
_2;
_Bool _3;
_Bool _4;
...
_4 = _2 ^ _3;
Here's a quick and dirty example of how this function could be rewritten with
modern C++. I omitted some necessary details, particularly the implementation
of the
linked list iterator. I also wrote it out quickly so I can't be certain it's
100%
correct, but it should give you an idea of whats pos
Hi Andrew,
On the contrary, code compiled with gcc with or without the applied patch
operates very differently, with only gcc with the applied patch producing a
fully correctly operating program as expected. Even if the above inline
assembly blocks never worked due to other optimizations however,
Hi Alex,
W dniu 28.06.2023 o 11:56, waffl3x pisze:
Here's a quick and dirty example of how this function could be rewritten with
modern C++. I omitted some necessary details, particularly the implementation
of the
linked list iterator. I also wrote it out quickly so I can't be certain it's
100
> Hmm... that's disappointing :( nothing was generated.
Function templates are not functions, they are templates of functions, they
will not generate any code unless they are instantiated.
> then again. I've noticed that you've changed pointers to indices.
No, I changed pointers to a template typ
Hi Alex,
W dniu 28.06.2023 o 14:12, waffl3x pisze:
[--]
them having some sort of fancy pointers in there somewhere. Realistically
though,
it will take some time to get used to all the C++isms before you would be able
to
be proficient with anything Boost would provide. I don't mean to b
Sounds like named address spaces to me:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Named-Address-Spaces.html
Best,
Martin
Am Dienstag, dem 27.06.2023 um 14:26 +0200 schrieb Rafał Pietrak via Gcc:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm not quite sure if this is correct mailbox for this suggestion (may
> be "embed
Hi Martin,
W dniu 28.06.2023 o 15:00, Martin Uecker pisze:
Sounds like named address spaces to me:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Named-Address-Spaces.html
Only to same extend, and only in x86 case.
The goal of the wish-item I've describe is to shorten pointers. I may be
wrong and have
Hello,
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, Julian Waters via Gcc wrote:
> On the contrary, code compiled with gcc with or without the applied patch
> operates very differently, with only gcc with the applied patch producing a
> fully correctly operating program as expected. Even if the above inline
> assembly b
On 28/06/2023 15:51, Rafał Pietrak via Gcc wrote:
Hi Martin,
W dniu 28.06.2023 o 15:00, Martin Uecker pisze:
Sounds like named address spaces to me:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Named-Address-Spaces.html
Only to same extend, and only in x86 case.
The goal of the wish-item I've describ
Hello,
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, Krister Walfridsson via Gcc wrote:
> Type safety
> ---
> Some transformations treat 1-bit types as a synonym of _Bool and mix the types
> in expressions, such as:
>
>_2;
> _Bool _3;
> _Bool _4;
> ...
> _4 = _2 ^ _3;
>
> and similarly mixing _Bool
Am Mittwoch, dem 28.06.2023 um 16:44 +0100 schrieb Richard Earnshaw (lists):
> On 28/06/2023 15:51, Rafał Pietrak via Gcc wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > W dniu 28.06.2023 o 15:00, Martin Uecker pisze:
> > >
> > > Sounds like named address spaces to me:
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Name
Hi Richard,
W dniu 28.06.2023 o 17:44, Richard Earnshaw (lists) pisze:
[--]
I think I understand what you're asking for but:
From what I can see below. You do. The case is exactly this.
1) You'd need a new ABI specification to handle this, probably involving
register assignment
On 28/06/2023 17:07, Martin Uecker wrote:
Am Mittwoch, dem 28.06.2023 um 16:44 +0100 schrieb Richard Earnshaw (lists):
On 28/06/2023 15:51, Rafał Pietrak via Gcc wrote:
Hi Martin,
W dniu 28.06.2023 o 15:00, Martin Uecker pisze:
Sounds like named address spaces to me:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onli
Am Mittwoch, dem 28.06.2023 um 17:49 +0100 schrieb Richard Earnshaw (lists):
> On 28/06/2023 17:07, Martin Uecker wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, dem 28.06.2023 um 16:44 +0100 schrieb Richard Earnshaw (lists):
> > > On 28/06/2023 15:51, Rafał Pietrak via Gcc wrote:
> > > > Hi Martin,
> > > >
> > > > W dni
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 8:04 AM Michael Matz wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, Julian Waters via Gcc wrote:
>
> > On the contrary, code compiled with gcc with or without the applied patch
> > operates very differently, with only gcc with the applied patch producing a
> > fully correctly o
Hi Steven,
Thanks for reaching out. The project is still in very early stages. So
far we have taught the analyzer the basic behavior for
PyLong_FromLong, PyList_New, and Py_DECREF via known function
subclassing. Additionally, Py_INCREF is supported out of the box.
Reference count checking function
Snapshot gcc-10-20230628 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20230628/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
Hello,
I hope this message finds you well.
I'd like to let you know that I have successfully set up a mirror
(http/https
server) in Greece for gcc.
Location : Thessaloniki / Greece
Admin Name : K. A. Draziotis
Admin Email : drazi...@gmail.com
Sponsor Name: Aristotle University of
Hi Richard,
W dniu 28.06.2023 o 17:44, Richard Earnshaw (lists) pisze:
[---]
I think I understand what you're asking for but:
1) You'd need a new ABI specification to handle this, probably involving
register assignments (for the 'segment' addresses), the initialization
of those at star
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 5:47 PM Michael Matz via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, Krister Walfridsson via Gcc wrote:
>
> > Type safety
> > ---
> > Some transformations treat 1-bit types as a synonym of _Bool and mix the
> > types
> > in expressions, such as:
> >
> >_2;
>
Hi Andrew,
Here is a simpler testcase, with the resulting assembly attached below
int main() {
asm ("nop" "\n"
"\t" "nop" "\n"
"\t" "nop");
asm volatile ("nop" "\n"
"\t" "nop" "\n"
"\t" "nop");
}
objdump --disassemble-all -M intel -M
29 matches
Mail list logo
