On 24/06/2024 23:34, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote:
I was also proposing (and would like to re-air that here) enforcing that
the committer field of each commit is a (valid) @gcc.gnu.org email.
This can be configured repo-locally via:
$ git config committer.email @gcc.gnu.org
Git has supporte
Hi,
Andrew Stubbs writes:
> On 24/06/2024 23:34, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote:
>> I was also proposing (and would like to re-air that here) enforcing that
>> the committer field of each commit is a (valid) @gcc.gnu.org email.
>> This can be configured repo-locally via:
>>$ git config commit
On 25/06/2024 10:05, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
Hi,
Andrew Stubbs writes:
On 24/06/2024 23:34, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote:
I was also proposing (and would like to re-air that here) enforcing that
the committer field of each commit is a (valid) @gcc.gnu.org email.
This can be configured repo-l
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 12:36 AM Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sam James via Gcc writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > This comes up in #gcc on IRC every so often, so finally
> > writing an RFC.
> >
> > What?
> > ---
> >
> > I propose that MAINTAINERS be modified to be of the form,
> > adding an
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 at 10:06, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Andrew Stubbs writes:
>
> > On 24/06/2024 23:34, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote:
> >> I was also proposing (and would like to re-air that here) enforcing that
> >> the committer field of each commit is a (valid) @gcc.gnu.org
On 24.06.24 16:06, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 28.04.22 10:16, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
I test currently the Ada support for RTEMS in GCC 12. We have a
-mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard multilib for which the
Ada RTS is built like this:
make[4]: Entering directory
'/tmp/sh/b-
On 25.06.24 14:53, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 24.06.24 16:06, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 28.04.22 10:16, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
I test currently the Ada support for RTEMS in GCC 12. We have a
-mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard multilib for which the
Ada RTS is built like this:
Hi,
Richard Biener writes:
> [snip]
>> I was also proposing (and would like to re-air that here) enforcing
>> that the committer field of each commit is a (valid) @gcc.gnu.org
>> email. This can be configured repo-locally via:
>>
>> $ git config committer.email @gcc.gnu.org
>>
>> Git has supp
Am 25.06.24 um 21:08 schrieb Arsen Arsenović via Gcc:
Richard Biener writes:
I'd welcome this - care to create a patch for
contrib/gcc-git-customization.sh?
Sure - I've attached a partial patch. I didn't find the hook which runs
on each push to check commits, so the current patch is minim
Hi,
Thomas Koenig via Gcc writes:
> Am 25.06.24 um 21:08 schrieb Arsen Arsenović via Gcc:
>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>
>>> I'd welcome this - care to create a patch for
>>> contrib/gcc-git-customization.sh?
>> Sure - I've attached a partial patch. I didn't find the hook which runs
>> on each
> Here, the "-march=armv7-a+simd" was moved after the "-gnatez". So this
> option is dropped in switch-c.adb and doesn't get added to the ALI file.
This comes from the spec magic implemented in ada/gcc-interface/lang-specs.h
and it looks like the '+' character is not matched by '*' or some such.
I am in the middle of improving the isolation path pass for shifts
with out of range operands.
There are 3 options we could do really:
1) isolate the path to __builtin_unreachable
2) isolate the path to __builtin_trap
This is what is currently done for null pointer and divide by zero
3) isolate
On 6/25/24 8:44 PM, Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
I am in the middle of improving the isolation path pass for shifts
with out of range operands.
There are 3 options we could do really:
1) isolate the path to __builtin_unreachable
2) isolate the path to __builtin_trap
This is what is curren
Hello Eric,
On 26.06.24 01:35, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Here, the "-march=armv7-a+simd" was moved after the "-gnatez". So this
option is dropped in switch-c.adb and doesn't get added to the ALI file.
This comes from the spec magic implemented in ada/gcc-interface/lang-specs.h
and it looks like the
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 4:59 AM Jeff Law via Gcc wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/25/24 8:44 PM, Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
> > I am in the middle of improving the isolation path pass for shifts
> > with out of range operands.
> > There are 3 options we could do really:
> > 1) isolate the path to __builtin_u
15 matches
Mail list logo
