On 2021-06-01 07:28, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi David,
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 10:00 -0400, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote:
The GCC Steering Committee has decided to relax the requirement to
assign copyright for all changes to the Free Software Foundation. GCC
will continue to be developed, distrib
On 2021-04-20 18:08, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 8:43 PM David Edelsohn
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 8:23 PM Thomas Rodgers
wrote:
On 2021-04-20 17:09, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:52 PM Thomas Rodgers
wrote:
On 2021-04-20 15:25, David Edelsohn via
On 2021-04-20 18:08, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 8:43 PM David Edelsohn
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 8:23 PM Thomas Rodgers
wrote:
On 2021-04-20 17:09, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:52 PM Thomas Rodgers
wrote:
On 2021-04-20 15:25, David Edelsohn via
On 2021-04-20 17:23, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
On 2021-04-20 17:09, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:52 PM Thomas Rodgers
wrote:
On 2021-04-20 15:25, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:43 PM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
wrote:
The first release candidate for
On 2021-04-20 17:09, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:52 PM Thomas Rodgers
wrote:
On 2021-04-20 15:25, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:43 PM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
wrote:
The first release candidate for GCC 11.1 is available from
https
On 2021-04-20 15:25, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:43 PM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
wrote:
The first release candidate for GCC 11.1 is available from
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11.1.0-RC-20210420/
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11.1.0-RC-20210420
and s
On 2021-04-18 23:29, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, 02:41 Frosku, wrote:
On Sun Apr 18, 2021 at 9:22 PM BST, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc wrote:
That's why it's best to dissent politely, lest they incorrectly
conclude
their opinions are consensual, or majoritary, just because
On 2021-04-18 00:38, Christopher Dimech via Gcc wrote:
Listen very carefully - In the first quarter of 2011, Keith Chuvala
began discussing the need to drop all proprietary systems used to
command
the ISS. He specifically mentioned products from Microsoft and Red
Hat.
This was communicated to
On 2021-04-17 20:10, Christopher Dimech via Gcc wrote:
You have specified that the community does not require my approval or
that
of Eric Raymond. That is true of course. But many have gone through
so
much new age training that they ended up with a very sophisticated way
of bullshitting them
On 2021-04-17 12:08, Christopher Dimech wrote:
Thomas,
So we are decided? I am not pushing anybody down the cliff - rms, you
or anybody. I simply wish that after
a few world wars, people start seeing the light and things will be
somewhat blissed out working on free software.
In a lot of w
On 2021-04-17 10:40, Ville Voutilainen via Gcc wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 20:31, Christopher Dimech
wrote:
I do not see people really intending to fork. It explains why
detractors
have gone berserk.
I appreciate your colorful exaggerations, but I should point out that
the libstdc++
ma
On 2021-04-11 16:29, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
On 2021-04-11 15:23, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Apr 11, 2021, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
On 2021-04-11 12:30, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc wrote:
AFAIK, you actually have no real say on who the company to whom you
sold your services assigns *their* copyrights
On 2021-04-11 15:23, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Apr 11, 2021, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
On 2021-04-11 12:30, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc wrote:
AFAIK, you actually have no real say on who the company to whom you
sold your services assigns *their* copyrights to.
That statement is certainly not true
On 2021-04-11 12:30, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc wrote:
On Apr 11, 2021, David Malcolm via Gcc wrote:
I don't want to be in an environment where, it turns out, the leader
of
the non-profit that owns copyright on the bulk of the last 8 years of
my work, and controls the license on the bulk of my
On 2021-04-10 09:01, Giacomo Tesio wrote:
It's fantastic how inclusive you are, isn't it? :-D
Indeed you ARE inclusive to those who share your interests, like
Nathan.
Just not to everybody else.
I share with Nathan an interest in making GCC the best C++ compiler and
standard library, and
On 2021-04-10 08:54, Christopher Dimech wrote:
<...snip...>
If you create a very pleasant wonderful atmosphere, everybody behaves
wonderfully. If you create an unpleasant atmosphere, a whole lot of
people act nasty. That's how it is.
This is crux of it really. For many RMS has very much cre
On 2021-04-09 14:34, Christopher Dimech wrote:
On the contrary, I eagerly await each and every one of your missives
on
this topic, hoping for exactly that very thing to occur.
I do not see how you and your friends at redhat could really get any
value
from it, because being a seeker of truth
On 2021-04-10 05:35, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021, 12:57 Pankaj Jangid,
wrote:
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc writes:
You are clueless about what the SC actually does, or the control they
have over GCC.
I think, it would be great help if someone can document what the SC
does.
On 2021-04-09 14:02, Christopher Dimech wrote:
But you seem too ignorant to introspect the likelihood that I could in
effect have
many valuable things to say.
On the contrary, I eagerly await each and every one of your missives on
this topic, hoping for exactly that very
thing to occur.
On 2021-04-09 11:02, Christopher Dimech via Gcc wrote:
[... snip ...]
We (the free software world) does not need a person with the qualities
of RMS any more - that is the point. There should not be such a
position as "Chief GNUsance".
Secondly, I cannot clearly see what status you have for ma
On 2021-04-08 10:22, Giacomo Tesio wrote:
No, David,
On April 8, 2021 3:00:57 PM UTC, David Brown
wrote:
(And yes, I mean FOSS here, not just free software.)
you are not talking about Free Software, but Open Source.
FOSS, as a term, has been very successful to spread confusion.
his at
On 2021-03-31 17:04, Giacomo Tesio wrote:
Hi Jeff,
thanks for fixing your affiliation, but let me note that it doesn't
change a dime for the geopolitical-diversity issue that affects GCC
since before RMS joined the Steering Committee.
Not to argue counter to the observation that there is cle
On 2021-03-29 17:39, Christopher Dimech via Gcc wrote:
You might say that the fullness of Thomas Jefferson's legacy should be
acknowledged, but he did a bit more with his life than own slaves, just
as the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. did more with his time on earth
than cheat on his wife and
On 2021-03-26 15:53, Hi-Angel via Gcc wrote:
Hello! I don't know all the details, and it surprises me nobody is
asking for them. Let me be the first.
A cursory reading of the top of Nathan's email states the reason for not
including the URLs, but ~half of the cited points come from Stallman'
Thomas Rodgers writes:
> I am also happy to help
>
rodgertq on freenode and oftc
> Jonathan Wakely writes:
>
>> I imagine a lot of people are going to feel lost in the first few
>> weeks of using Git.
>>
>> If you are stuck or confused about usin
I am also happy to help
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> I imagine a lot of people are going to feel lost in the first few
> weeks of using Git.
>
> If you are stuck or confused about using Git for GCC development and
> too embarrassed to ask in public, feel free to contact me on IRC. I'm
> jwakely on O
Paul Smith writes:
> On Mon, 2020-01-13 at 11:33 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> I imagine a lot of people are going to feel lost in the first few
>> weeks of using Git.
>
> I don't do IRC (and I'm not a GCC dev :)) but I'm happy to help via email.
>
> One thing I'll say though: if you're an Em
Is it ok to say Carlos is f'n awesome? You know, to keep it positive :)
Carlos O'Donell writes:
> GNU Maintainers, developers, volunteers, etc.,
>
> This relates to all of our projects and how they operate. Please take
> a minute and look over this email.
>
> This is an invitation to a public dis
icient parallelism is actually super-needed in a
> world where fast, simple ed efficient software is paramount, when do you
> reasonably foresee GCC9 shipping containing the C++17 parallel algorithms?
>
> Marco
>
> Il giorno lun 21 mag 2018 alle ore 14:32 Thomas Rodgers
> ha scritto:
&g
There is work ongoing to complete C++17 support in libstdc++, this
includes providing support for the C++17 parallel algorithms.
Marco Ippolito writes:
> Hi,
>
> the good book "C++17 STL Cookbook" in chapter 9 "Parallelism and
> Concurrency" describes some of the 69 algorithms that were extended
30 matches
Mail list logo
