Was microblaze-rtems attempted? I would have expected a failure like these if
so.
--joel
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote:
Hi!
Build logs at
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=39192
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=40718
(I
On Tue, 2013-11-26 06:33:39 -0600, Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com
wrote:
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote:
Build logs at
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=39192
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=40718
(I also
On 26 November 2013 14:51, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 06:33:39 -0600, Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com
wrote:
Was microblaze-rtems attempted? I would have expected a failure like
these if so.
No, it wasn't. It's not on the list of targets in
On Tue, 2013-11-26 15:21:12 +, Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com
wrote:
On 26 November 2013 14:51, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 06:33:39 -0600, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
Was microblaze-rtems attempted? I would have
On 11/25/13 19:26, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Hi!
Build logs at
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=39192
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=40718
(I also think that we'd have the little endian version on the target
list at
On 11/26/13 07:27, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Is there something that microblaze-rtems exposes that is not already
covered by other microblaze or rtems targets that are already included?
Probably not (without having looked at what that configuration would
actually pull in.)
I believe that
On Tue, 2013-11-26 07:50:34 -0800, Michael Eager ea...@eagercon.com wrote:
On 11/25/13 19:26, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Build logs at
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=39192
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=40718
(I also think
On Tue, 2013-11-26 08:13:12 -0800, Michael Eager ea...@eagercon.com wrote:
On 11/26/13 08:08, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Thanks for looking into the issue anyways! (...and what do you
think about adding a microblazeel target to the list?)
Sounds OK to me.
Any suggestion of which target(s)
On 11/26/13 08:08, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 07:50:34 -0800, Michael Eager ea...@eagercon.com wrote:
On 11/25/13 19:26, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Build logs at
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=39192
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
The idea if config-list.mk is not to build every conceivable target
configuration, but to give a reasonable converage of the different
target architectures and OS/library configurations so that you can
effectively test a patch with unknown
On 11/26/13 08:16, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 08:13:12 -0800, Michael Eager ea...@eagercon.com wrote:
On 11/26/13 08:08, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Thanks for looking into the issue anyways! (...and what do you
think about adding a microblazeel target to the list?)
Sounds OK
On 11/26/2013 10:52 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
The idea if config-list.mk is not to build every conceivable target
configuration, but to give a reasonable converage of the different
target architectures and OS/library configurations so that you
On 11/26/2013 06:38 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Is there something that microblaze-rtems exposes that is not already
covered by other microblaze or rtems targets that are already included?
I believe it was on the microblaze where someone broke the
libgcc pattern for rtems by changing the pattern
On 11/26/2013 11:58 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/26/2013 06:38 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Is there something that microblaze-rtems exposes that is not already
covered by other microblaze or rtems targets that are already included?
I believe it was on the microblaze where someone broke the
On 26 November 2013 17:38, Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
The key to seeing the value of testing *-rtems is moving
beyond builds or not and into running tests on more
languages.
Well, we are already configuring with --enable-languages=all,ada,go ,
so there are a lot of
On Tue, 2013-11-26 19:50:10 +, Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com
wrote:
On 26 November 2013 17:38, Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
as to Joern's question:
Is there something that microblaze-rtems exposes that is not
already covered by other microblaze or rtems
Hi!
Build logs at
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=39192
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=40718
(I also think that we'd have the little endian version on the target
list at contrib/config-list.mk ...)
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC
17 matches
Mail list logo
