--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 17:57
---
*** Bug 17938 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-10-11
18:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE: in schedule_in
Here is a C example which is almost equivalent to the objective-C example:
struct d
{
int a;
};
void abort(void);
typedef struct d (*f)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:07
---
And here is a test which is little smaller (which generates the same problem/error):
struct d
{ int a; };
void abort(void);
typedef struct d (*f) (int i);
f ff(void);
void test1()
{
f t = ff();
t(0);
}
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:10
---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg00932.html.
--
What|Removed |Added
Configured with:
--build=mingw32
--host=mingw32
--target=avr
--enable-languages=c,c++,java
After build and install, in the installation directory are
avr-gcjh.exe
avr-avr-gcjh.exe
and both executables have the same file size and they both report as the gcjh
program with --version.
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:30
---
Do you use --program-prefix at all, if so this where the bug is. Otherwise this is a
target bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17939
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:32
---
Subject: Bug 16266
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 18:32:42
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog function.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:32
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-11 18:33 ---
Subject: Re: Duplicate executable installed in building cross
java compiler
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:30
---
Do
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:37
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14614 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:37
---
*** Bug 17939 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Double host prefixed gcjh |Double target prefixed gcjh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14614
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:46
---
Subject: Bug 14856
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 18:45:44
Modified files:
zlib : ChangeLog FAQ INDEX Makefile.am
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:47
---
zlib updated
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
Bug 15697 depends on bug 14856, which changed state.
Bug 14856 Summary: Update bundled zlib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14856
What|Old Value |New Value
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14856
Andrew,
After reading 17917, I agree. Thanks for your reply.
Joe Koski
on 10/11/04 11:03 AM, Andrew Pinski at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 11, 2004, at 12:38 PM, Joe Koski wrote:
backend decl for module variable
This is most likely the same as PR 17917.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 19:08
---
Do you get a double prefix for gcj as well?
Can you tell me how the Makefile variable program_transform_name
is set in build/gcc/Makefile?
I suspect the problem is that GCJH_TARGET_INSTALL_NAME
adds a
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14614
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-11 19:14 ---
Subject: Re: Double target prefixed gcjh
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 19:08
---
Do you get a double prefix for gcj as well?
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 19:21
---
If I use the -I option, it works.
Without the -I option, I get an error as I would expect:
opsy. gcj -C org/jibble/socnet/Graph.java
org/jibble/socnet/Graph.java: In class `org.jibble.socnet.Graph':
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 19:28
---
But:
org/jibble/socnet/Graph.java:484: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
is an ICE just that with --disable-checking on, you get that message instead of a seg
fault.
--
Since the introduction of version 3.4.0 I'm unable to build gcc.
I've build it many times before, but with 3.40, 3.4.1, 3.4.2 it is
always the same, under all possible variations regarding build directory
etc.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/GCC/Install_3.4.2 make bootstrap
Configuring in libiberty
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 19:36
---
read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html first and provide all the needed info.
We need how you configured and what target is this for.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17940
--- Additional Comments From o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk 2004-10-11
20:02 ---
Subject: Re: make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 07:36:22PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:13
---
I read through these patches a little.
I don't understand why ltmain.sh is the way it is,
but Gary's comment seemed appropriate.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg02333.html
Doesn't the second
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:13
---
What version of make are you using, this works for me and a huge amount of other
people.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17940
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:26
---
Subject: Bug 16614
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 20:26:53
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-10-11 20:32 ---
See
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg02467.html
I don't know how to do --disable-fast-install for gcc.
--enable-fast-install is totally wrong for ELF. It should
never be used for any ELF targets.
--
Hi,
here's another problem, this time with legacy f90 code:
program gfcbug17
! gfortran cannot parse this complex constant:
complex, parameter :: c0 = (- 0.5, -0.5)
print *, c0
end program gfcbug17
I get:
In file gfcbug17.f90:3
complex, parameter :: c0 = (- 0.5, -0.5)
--- Additional Comments From o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk 2004-10-11
20:37 ---
Subject: Re: make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled SOLVED
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 08:14:00PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-11 20:47
---
Invalid, then.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:49 ---
could add
enum _Ios_Seekdir { _S_ios_seekdir_beg = 0, _S_ios_seekdir_cur = 1,
_S_ios_seekdir_end = 2
_S_ios_seekdir_final = 1L 16 };
This would change the value of (the currently unfortunately named)
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:49
---
I read that. What I observe is that .libs/gij is created
by the build. Then if I run gij (not .libs/gij), it creates
.libs/lt-gij.
My understanding is that --enable-fast-install is what makes
all this
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:51
---
Confirmed, IFC accepts the code.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-10-11 21:01 ---
.libs/lt-gij is used by make check. Try
# grep -i gij */*.exp
in libjava/testsuite.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17311
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 21:20
---
I suppose you could try this.
I made it by looking at what other install rules are
doing in this area. I'm not at all sure it is correct.
Index: Make-lang.in
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 21:27
---
I'm afraid I couldn't really parse that.
To me it looks like libjava_find_gij looks for
gij in the build directory. This in turn is
a shell script which, if needed, creates lt-gij.
The fact that the
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-11 22:18 ---
Subject: Re: Double target prefixed gcjh
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 21:20
---
I suppose you could try this.
I made it by
[~/rpm/BUILD/linux-2.6.9-rc4] # LANG=C gcc twofish.i -c -O2
crypto/twofish.c: In function `twofish_setkey':
crypto/twofish.c:801: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
[~/rpm/BUILD/linux-2.6.9-rc4] # LANG=C gcc twofish.i -c -O
# gcc -v
Reading specs from
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2004-10-11 22:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=7328)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7328action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17942
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |rtl-optimization
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail|
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 22:48 ---
I'm not sure if this suffices, will try tomorrow:
Index: primary.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/primary.c,v
retrieving revision 1.13
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 22:50
---
Subject: Bug 17936
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 22:50:00
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
gcc/cp :
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 22:51
---
Fixed in GCC 4.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 22:51 ---
It would be list ugh. Damn that allocator rebinding! I'm developing severe
issues with this particular container. Well, this kills off this QoI
improvement. I've reverted this on mainline, and fixed up the
--
Bug 17522 depends on bug 17936, which changed state.
Bug 17936 Summary: [4.0 regression] Declaration of specialization rejected
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17936
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 22:52 ---
Mine.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bkoz at gcc dot
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 22:57
---
Subject: Bug 17361
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 22:57:55
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog c-opts.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 23:02
---
Fixed on the mainline (yes this will be fixed other places too).
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-10-11 23:45 ---
Not a big fan of Andrew's patch. I don't think it will cover all the cases where
we have a problem. Basically, afaict, we're folding the toplevel call into
something else. In this case a builtin_memcpy to the
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-10-11 23:50 ---
It would be list ugh. Damn that allocator rebinding! I'm developing severe
issues with this particular container. Well, this kills off this QoI
improvement. I've reverted this on mainline, and fixed up the
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at redhat dot com 2004-10-12 00:30 ---
Subject: Re: Critical ~__pool troubles
Ok, but as long as we don't use that, let's avoid taking the lock a second
time in _M_reserve_block, the new calls and so on... I propose to protect
with macros or #if 0 or
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 01:10
---
Subject: Bug 17937
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 01:10:39
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog acconfig.h acinclude.m4
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 01:18
---
My CVS patch was accepted and installed into the master CVS sources. We can
patch the local cvs on gcc.gnu.org if necessary, but I don't see any real need
for that, given that gcc/fixinc is now gone. There
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 01:28
---
confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 01:52
---
Subject: Bug 15786
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 01:52:20
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog parser.c
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 01:52
---
Subject: Bug 15876
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 01:52:20
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog parser.c
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:07
---
Subject: Bug 15876
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 03:07:16
Modified files:
gcc/cp :
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:07
---
Subject: Bug 15786
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 03:07:16
Modified files:
gcc/cp :
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:17
---
Fixed in GCC 3.4.3.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:39
---
Confirmed on the mainline:
+===GNAT BUG
DETECTED==+
| 4.0.0 20041008 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1) Assert_Failure
einfo.adb:458|
| Error
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:46
---
Fixed on the mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:50
---
Confirmed on the mainline:
+===GNAT BUG
DETECTED==+
| 4.0.0 20041008 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1) GCC error: |
| in build_binary_op, at
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:52
---
Confirmed on the mainline:
+===GNAT BUG
DETECTED==+
| 4.0.0 20041008 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1) Assert_Failure
sem_ch3.adb:8760|
| Error
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:54
---
Fixed on the mainline:
test_244945.ads:5:19: premature usage of incomplete private type T defined at line 2
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:56
---
Confirmed, a different error on the mainline:
gimplification failed:
test_246185__t type_decl 0x42e7f980 test_246185__t
type record_type 0x42e44f80 test_246185__t type_2 BLK
size integer_cst
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15799
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:57
---
Confirmed on the mainline:
+===GNAT BUG
DETECTED==+
| 4.0.0 20041008 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1) Bus error |
| Error detected at
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 03:59
---
Confirmed on the mainline with a different error:
+===GNAT BUG
DETECTED==+
| 4.0.0 20041008 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1) GCC error: |
|
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15803
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15804
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15805
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 04:02
---
Confirmed on the mainline:
+===GNAT BUG
DETECTED==+
| 4.0.0 20041008 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1) GCC error: |
| in gimplify_expr, at
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15807
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15808
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15833
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15840
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15841
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15842
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15843
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15844
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15845
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15846
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15847
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15851
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15915
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15916
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 04:07
---
Confirmed on the mainline:
+===GNAT BUG
DETECTED==+
| 4.0.0 20041008 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1) GCC error: |
| in gnat_to_gnu_entity,
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 04:10
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 04:13
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 04:13
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 04:13
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2004-10-12 04:57 ---
Subject: Re: Math error in simple divide operation
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 09:00, tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 16:00
---
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 05:54
---
G++ 3.3 used a slightly different C++ ABI from G++ 3.4 and G++ 3.5 (which has
now been renamed G++ 4.0). You can get the 3.3 C++ ABI in G++ 3.4/4.0 by using
-fabi-version=1. So, that explains the 3.3 vs.
101 - 196 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
