[Bug c/96253] decimal floating point missing on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96253 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Target|

[Bug c++/96258] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in cp_parser_declaration)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96258 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c++/96257] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol, at cp/parser.c:3948

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96257 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug sanitizer/96259] New: Regression warning on GCC 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96259 Bug ID: 96259 Summary: Regression warning on GCC 10 Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer

[Bug target/92892] [AARCH64] TBL-based permutations can be implemented more efficiently for 2-element vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92892 Bug 92892 depends on bug 82199, which changed state. Bug 82199 Summary: __builtin_shuffle sometimes should produce zip1 rather than TBL https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82199 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/88670] [meta-bug] generic vector extension issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88670 Bug 88670 depends on bug 82199, which changed state. Bug 82199 Summary: __builtin_shuffle sometimes should produce zip1 rather than TBL https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82199 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/82199] __builtin_shuffle sometimes should produce zip1 rather than TBL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82199 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 93720, which changed state. Bug 93720 Summary: [10/11 Regression] vector creation from two parts of two vectors produces TBL rather than ins https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93720 What|Removed

[Bug target/93720] [10/11 Regression] vector creation from two parts of two vectors produces TBL rather than ins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93720 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug target/96260] New: RISC-V: -fsanitize=kernel-address is not available after gcc10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96260 Bug ID: 96260 Summary: RISC-V: -fsanitize=kernel-address is not available after gcc10 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/93720] [10/11 Regression] vector creation from two parts of two vectors produces TBL rather than ins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93720 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.2|11.0

[Bug target/96260] RISC-V: -fsanitize=kernel-address is not available after gcc10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96260 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||91441 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwa

[Bug debug/96261] New: -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -Os -fno-gcse-lm -fnon-call-exceptions

cc version 11.0.0 20200721 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/96262] New: [11 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2280 with -O -mavx512bw

gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r11-2246-20200721142816-gc850a642e1d-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 11.0.0 20200721 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/96263] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE: in lra_assign, at lra-assigns.c:1648 with -O -flive-range-shrinkage -fnon-call-exceptions -msse4 --param=max-sched-ready-insns=1

-with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r11-2246-20200721142816-gc850a642e1d-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 11.0.0 20200721 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] New: [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

nux-gnu-ld --with-as=/usr/bin/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r11-2246-20200721142816-gc850a642e1d-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-powerpc64le Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 11.0.0 2

[Bug target/96260] RISC-V: -fsanitize=kernel-address is not available after gcc10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96260 Kito Cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kito at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from

[Bug target/96265] New: building nvptx-none on platforms other than x86_64-linux-gnu, e.g. aarch64-linux-gnu and powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265 Bug ID: 96265 Summary: building nvptx-none on platforms other than x86_64-linux-gnu, e.g. aarch64-linux-gnu and powerpc64le-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug c++/96266] New: Macro defined as enum in parens resolves to 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96266 Bug ID: 96266 Summary: Macro defined as enum in parens resolves to 1 Product: gcc Version: 7.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/96266] Macro defined as enum in parens resolves to 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96266 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > It gets complicated quickly with all the corner cases. I tried to simplify, but I did find anything simpler and working. > Last line of the added logic needs a space before the 0 Yes. I have lea

[Bug fortran/88080] Add warning if IMPLICIT NONE is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88080 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-21 Status|UNC

[Bug c++/96266] Macro defined as enum in parens resolves to 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96266 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/96267] New: gcov-tool merge more coverage data error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96267 Bug ID: 96267 Summary: gcov-tool merge more coverage data error. Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-pr

[Bug sanitizer/96259] Regression warning on GCC 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96259 --- Comment #1 from Frediano Ziglio --- The commit introducing this regression is: commit 6889a3acfeed47265886676c6d43b04ef799fb82 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Thu Sep 19 22:15:34 2019 + PR middle-end/91631 - buffer overflow into an ar

[Bug gcov-profile/96267] gcov-tool merge more coverage data error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96267 --- Comment #1 from John Dong --- Created attachment 48908 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48908&action=edit add missing IN_GCOV_TOOL macro hmmm refer to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95332 Fix missing IN_GCOV

[Bug libstdc++/68737] FAIL: 22_locale/num_put/put/char/14220.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68737 --- Comment #31 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2020-07-13 7:20 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Dave, did you test this for the gcc-8 branch? Do you still want it backported > to that branch? Yes please.  The patch applies cleanly o

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.2

[Bug target/96263] [10/11 Regression] ICE: in lra_assign, at lra-assigns.c:1648 with -O -flive-range-shrinkage -fnon-call-exceptions -msse4 --param=max-sched-ready-insns=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96263 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/96262] [11 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2280 with -O -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96262 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug target/96260] [10/11 Regression] RISC-V: -fsanitize=kernel-address is not available after gcc10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96260 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.2 Summary|RISC-V:

[Bug sanitizer/96259] [10/11 Regression] warning on GCC 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96259 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.2 Summary|Regression warn

[Bug libstdc++/68737] FAIL: 22_locale/num_put/put/char/14220.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68737 --- Comment #32 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c54d4e218f18c66ce1ad9d7e7762357fd7edacb7 commit r8-10367-gc54d4e218f18c66ce1ad9d7e7762357fd7edacb7 Author: Jonathan Wakel

[Bug c++/96268] New: class-type NTTP CTAD for string-literal aggregate fails on aggregate initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96268 Bug ID: 96268 Summary: class-type NTTP CTAD for string-literal aggregate fails on aggregate initialization Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug fortran/94599] Invalid constructor for derived types with recursive allocatable components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94599 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-21 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/96255] [F2018] Implement optional type spec for index in DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/95952] [8 Regression] gcc-8 bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952 Will Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #19 from Will Schmidt

[Bug target/95952] [8 Regression] gcc-8 bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952 Will Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/96269] New: optional comparison with nullopt fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96269 Bug ID: 96269 Summary: optional comparison with nullopt fails Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug c++/96257] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol, at cp/parser.c:3948

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96257 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/96259] [10/11 Regression] warning on GCC 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96259 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/94655] [10/11 Regression] Implicit assignment operator triggers stringop-overflow warning since r10-5451-gef29b12cfbb4979a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94655 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||freddy77 at gmail dot com --- Comment #10

[Bug c++/96258] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in cp_parser_declaration)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96258 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88080] Add warning if IMPLICIT NONE is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88080 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/96241] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96241 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/68737] FAIL: 22_locale/num_put/put/char/14220.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68737 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|9.0

[Bug libstdc++/96269] optional comparison with nullopt fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96269 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Your operator== should be const-qualified.

[Bug c++/96268] class-type NTTP CTAD for string-literal aggregate fails on aggregate initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96268 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug c++/96268] class-type NTTP CTAD for string-literal aggregate fails on aggregate initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96268 --- Comment #2 from Will Wray --- Thanks Marek (and thanks again for implementing it) - it does seem so. I've asked around a little - tcanens and brevzin point to a core issue to do with NTTP CTAD but didn't offer an opinion or encourage this bug

[Bug fortran/94070] Assumed-rank arrays – bounds mishandled, SIZE/SHAPE/UBOUND/LBOUND

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94070 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-21 Priority|P3

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 48909 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48909&action=edit Extensive test with RZ and EN

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 48910 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48910&action=edit Extensive test with RN and EN

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #7 from Dominique

[Bug target/96247] -falign-functions=0 works wrongly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96247 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug libgomp/93305] [OpenACC] 'acc_shutdown' vs. active data lifetimes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93305 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/OpenACC/

[Bug c++/96268] class-type NTTP CTAD for string-literal aggregate fails on aggregate initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96268 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- name<{"hi"}> would work if convert_nontype_argument called digest_init for the CONSTRUCTOR. This reminds me of another PR where I wanted to add such a digest_init call, but in the end wound up doing somethin

[Bug c/96270] New: stdarg malfunction with -m32 and -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96270 Bug ID: 96270 Summary: stdarg malfunction with -m32 and -Os Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/96197] Excess memory consumption, positive correlation with the size of a constexpr array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96197 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/96269] optional comparison with nullopt fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96269 --- Comment #2 from sshannin at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > Your operator== should be const-qualified. I don't disagree. I can also fully remove the operator== and it compiles as well (why should the presence

[Bug c/96270] stdarg malfunction with -m32 and -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96270 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug tree-optimization/96271] New: Failure to optimize memcmp of doubles to avoid going through memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96271 Bug ID: 96271 Summary: Failure to optimize memcmp of doubles to avoid going through memory Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/96270] [8/9/10/11 Regression] stdarg malfunction with -m32 and -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96270 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-21 CC|

[Bug c++/96257] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol, at cp/parser.c:3948

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96257 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sid

[Bug c++/96257] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol, at cp/parser.c:3948

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96257 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- I think gomp.exp adds -fopenmp -Wno-hsa automatically.

[Bug tree-optimization/96272] New: Failure to optimize overflow check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96272 Bug ID: 96272 Summary: Failure to optimize overflow check Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimizati

[Bug target/95750] [x86] Use dummy atomic insn instead of mfence in __atomic_thread_fence(seq_cst)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95750 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02363d5fdb862a11e6e65ac5b0d1f5ee0c422dc3 commit r11-2255-g02363d5fdb862a11e6e65ac5b0d1f5ee0c422dc3 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Tue J

[Bug target/96271] Failure to optimize memcmp of doubles to avoid going through memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96271 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |target --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c++/96251] co_yield incorrectly rejected in non-explicitly-constexpr generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96251 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-21 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/95988] New: [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds/-Wstringop-overflow warning with loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95988 Bug ID: 95988 Summary: [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds/-Wstringop-overflow warning with loop Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: NEW Keywords: diagnosti

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7) > Could someone used to git commit the fix and the tests and back port them to > all the active branches? I think the normal procedure would be t

[Bug c++/96003] [11 Regression] spurious -Wnonnull calling a member on the result of static_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003 --- Comment #11 from Stephan Bergmann --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #10) > Patch for the static cast: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/550231.html LibreOffice runs into the same issue, but while the above patch

[Bug c++/96257] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol, at cp/parser.c:3948

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96257 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/89574] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28f2a080cc27531a8c78aec9f44aeff4961c2a4c commit r11-2256-g28f2a080cc27531a8c78aec9f44aeff4961c2a4c Author: Harald Anlauf Date: T

[Bug sanitizer/95137] Sanitizers seem to be missing support for coroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137 --- Comment #31 from Rafael Avila de Espindola --- Hi Iain, Any update on this? If there is any way I can help, please let me know. It has been a decade since I looked into gcc, but I should still be able to test patches or implement small side

[Bug fortran/96255] [F2018] Implement optional type spec for index in DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255 --- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at charter dot net --- (In reply to kargl from comment #1) > This is related to PR78219. > > If someone takes up the challenge, then this show accept only > standard conforming type specs. That is, INTEGER*4 should

[Bug fortran/96255] [F2018] Implement optional type spec for index in DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255 --- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at charter dot net --- (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > This issue depends on the fix for FORALL. In gfc_match_do in the concurrent > section, one gets to > > m = match_forall_header (&head, &mask); > >

[Bug c++/96257] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol, at cp/parser.c:3948

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96257 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96197] Excess memory consumption, positive correlation with the size of a constexpr array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96197 Joe Burzinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tridacnid at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug middle-end/95988] [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds/-Wstringop-overflow warning with loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95988 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Blocks|

[Bug tree-optimization/94655] [10/11 Regression] Implicit assignment operator triggers stringop-overflow warning since r10-5451-gef29b12cfbb4979a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94655 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 95988, which changed state. Bug 95988 Summary: [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds/-Wstringop-overflow warning with loop https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95988 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/96255] [F2018] Implement optional type spec for index in DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 07:44:16PM +, jvdelisle at charter dot net wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255 > > --- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at charter dot net --- > (In reply to kargl

[Bug c++/96273] New: ice in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294, unrecognizable insn:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96273 Bug ID: 96273 Summary: ice in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294, unrecognizable insn: Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug sanitizer/95137] Sanitizers seem to be missing support for coroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137 --- Comment #32 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Rafael Avila de Espindola from comment #31) > Hi Iain, > > Any update on this? If there is any way I can help, please let me know. It > has been a decade since I looked into gcc, but I should sti

[Bug c++/96003] [11 Regression] spurious -Wnonnull calling a member on the result of static_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003 --- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor --- Thanks for the test case. In it, the no-warning bit set on the conditional expression to avoid the warning is cleared before the expression reaches the warning code. The culprit seems to be the cp_fold_conv

[Bug tree-optimization/94655] [10/11 Regression] Implicit assignment operator triggers stringop-overflow warning since r10-5451-gef29b12cfbb4979a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94655 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major

[Bug target/96273] ice in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294, unrecognizable insn:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96273 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Reduced C++ code: int b, c, e; int d[1]; void f() { int a; for (;;) { c = 0; for (; c <= 1000; b += 10, c++) { a = 0; for (; a < 10; a++) if (b) e += d[b] = e;

[Bug testsuite/96274] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/convert-fp-128.c breaks on power 9 after r11-2206

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96274 Bug ID: 96274 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/convert-fp-128.c breaks on power 9 after r11-2206 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug target/92488] GCC generates calls to __dpd_trunctdsd2 with -mhard-dfp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92488 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:699f9c0cc1bcc8acfd78c02315c963bf790c874d commit r11-2258-g699f9c0cc1bcc8acfd78c02315c963bf790c874d Author: Peter Bergner Date: T

[Bug middle-end/84051] [7/8/9 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds access via an array pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84051 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |--- Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 84051, which changed state. Bug 84051 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds access via an array pointer https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84051 What|Removed

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Simpler patch with comments --- ../_clean/libgfortran/io/write_float.def2020-06-13 03:11:55.0 +0200 +++ libgfortran/io/write_float.def 2020-07-21 23:03:08.0 +0200 @@ -987,16 +

[Bug testsuite/96274] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/convert-fp-128.c breaks on power 9 after r11-2206

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96274 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-7-21 Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/95700] read-md.c: "missing sentinel in function call" when building gcc with musl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700 --- Comment #16 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- I finally managed to reproduce this by doing `./configure --host=aarch64-none-linux-gnu` on gcc113. The problem is that `CXX_FOR_BUILD` doesn't seem to be set correctly - normally it's `g++-4.8.1 -std=gnu

[Bug target/96271] Failure to optimize memcmp of doubles to avoid going through memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96271 --- Comment #2 from Gabriel Ravier --- What do you mean ? -march=intel doesn't exist and I have tried -mtune=intel, I see no difference in the handling of this regardless of any -march/tune flags (I've tried : none, -march=nocona, -march=tigerlak

[Bug libfortran/93592] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with EN descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Patch submitted at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-July/054769.html.

[Bug libfortran/93567] G edit descriptor uses E instead of F editing in rounding mode UP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- patch submitted at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-July/054770.html.

[Bug c++/92812] Implement P1975R0: Fixing the wording of parenthesized aggregate-initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92812 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- This should now work too: int (&&r)[3] = static_cast(42); int (&&r2)[1] = static_cast(42); and in both cases the reference declarations lifetime-extend the array temporary.

[Bug target/95237] LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT shrinks alignment, FAIL gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237 --- Comment #21 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a9d711df36b42b6494b73a90c7ebf050e904493 commit r11-2259-g0a9d711df36b42b6494b73a90c7ebf050e904493 Author: Sunil K Pandey Date: Fri Ju

[Bug target/95237] LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT shrinks alignment, FAIL gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

  1   2   >