[Bug target/116625] [15 regression] regressions on arm-eabi since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116625 --- Comment #4 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Thank you for the explanation! I must confess that most of it went over my head... (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > So yes this is just a testcase issue. Just needs a small testcase ch

[Bug target/116625] [15 regression] regressions on arm-eabi since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116625 --- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Since the difference is in main, I suspect if the function was named > differently there would be no difference. That is main is known to be called > on

[Bug target/116625] New: [15 regression] regressions on arm-eabi since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116625 Bug ID: 116625 Summary: [15 regression] regressions on arm-eabi since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: testsui

[Bug target/116623] New: [15 regression] regressions on arm-linux-gnueabihf since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116623 Bug ID: 116623 Summary: [15 regression] regressions on arm-linux-gnueabihf since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywor

[Bug target/116604] New: [15 regression] regressions on aarch64 since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116604 Bug ID: 116604 Summary: [15 regression] regressions on aarch64 since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: testsuit

[Bug target/116589] [15 regression] vectorization regressions on aarch64 since r15-1575-gea8061f46a30

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116589 --- Comment #5 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Thank you for the quick analysis and the testcase fix!

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot

[Bug target/116589] New: [15 regression] vectorization regressions on aarch64 since gcc-15-1575-gea8061f46a30

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116589 Bug ID: 116589 Summary: [15 regression] vectorization regressions on aarch64 since gcc-15-1575-gea8061f46a30 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Key

[Bug other/116260] testsuite-management/validate_failures.py: split multilib ABIs in results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116260 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug tree-optimization/115060] [15 Regression] Probable an issue around usage of vect_look_through_possible_promotion in tree-vect-patterns.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115060 --- Comment #6 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- (In reply to Feng Xue from comment #5) > Fixed. I confirmed that I don't see the failure anymore. Thank you!

[Bug target/116010] [15 regression] vectorization regressions on arm and aarch64 since r15-491-gc290e6a0b7a9de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010 --- Comment #7 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Created attachment 58729 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58729&action=edit Testsuite results with/without bisected commit. Regarding the gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90, I'm attach

[Bug target/116010] [15 regression] vectorization regressions on arm and aarch64 since r15-491-gc290e6a0b7a9de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010 --- Comment #6 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > (In reply to Thiago Jung Bauermann from comment #3) > > > First gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vabs.c now calls memcpy because of the > > > restrict instead of

[Bug target/116010] [15 regression] vectorization regressions on arm and aarch64 since r15-491-gc290e6a0b7a9de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010 --- Comment #4 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > The gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90 testcase is incredibly bad because it has so > many loops that are or are not vectorized. It should ideally be split u

[Bug target/116010] [15 regression] vectorization regressions on arm and aarch64 since r15-491-gc290e6a0b7a9de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010 --- Comment #3 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Created attachment 58725 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58725&action=edit mve-vabs.s generated by the test after commit c290e6a0b7a9. (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #

[Bug testsuite/115140] [15 regression] libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c excess errors after r15-579-ga9251ab3c91c8c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115140 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot

[Bug target/116010] New: [15 regression] vectorization regressions on arm and aarch64 since r15-491-gc290e6a0b7a9de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010 Bug ID: 116010 Summary: [15 regression] vectorization regressions on arm and aarch64 since r15-491-gc290e6a0b7a9de Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/115707] New: [15 regression] FAIL in gcc.target/aarch64/sve/sad_1.c since gcc-15-863-ga3aeff4ce95b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115707 Bug ID: 115707 Summary: [15 regression] FAIL in gcc.target/aarch64/sve/sad_1.c since gcc-15-863-ga3aeff4ce95b Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug tree-optimization/115157] incorrect TBAA for derived types involving enum types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115157 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot

[Bug target/115373] [15 Regression] RISCV slp-cond-2-big-array.c slp-cond-2.c scan-tree-dump fails since r15-859-geaaa4b88038

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115373 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot

[Bug target/115253] [14/15 regression] New tests added by r14-10122-gad45086178d833 fail on Cortex M23 and M55 bare metal targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115253 --- Comment #16 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Thank you!

[Bug target/115253] New tests added by r14-10122-gad45086178d833 fail on Cortex M23 and M55 bare metal targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115253 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.

[Bug target/115253] New tests added by r14-10122-gad45086178d833 fail on Cortex M23 and M55 bare metal targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115253 --- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Created attachment 58298 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58298&action=edit gcc.log for Cortext M55 These log files were obtained with GCC commit g:c5a7628470a7fb801ebeea82e16a4

[Bug target/115253] New tests added by r14-10122-gad45086178d833 fail on Cortex M23 and M55 bare metal targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115253 --- Comment #1 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Created attachment 58297 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58297&action=edit gcc.log for Cortext M23

[Bug target/115253] New: New tests added by r14-10122-gad45086178d833 fail on Cortex M23 and M55 bare metal targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115253 Bug ID: 115253 Summary: New tests added by r14-10122-gad45086178d833 fail on Cortex M23 and M55 bare metal targets Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/91970] arm: 64bit int to double conversion does not respect rounding mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91970 --- Comment #16 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15) > (In reply to Thiago Jung Bauermann from comment #14) > > This came up in the context of a Linux kernel patch series providing a > > "Unified cross-arch

[Bug target/91970] arm: 64bit int to double conversion does not respect rounding mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91970 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot o

[Bug testsuite/114568] New: [14 regression] g++.dg/vect/pr84556.cc fails to produce executable since r14-9706-gb8e7aaaf350a45

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114568 Bug ID: 114568 Summary: [14 regression] g++.dg/vect/pr84556.cc fails to produce executable since r14-9706-gb8e7aaaf350a45 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/99829] MVE: ICE in lra_assign at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99829 --- Comment #9 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Hello Vladimir, Sorry for the delay in getting back to this. (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #8) > The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov > : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c91f8

[Bug target/99829] MVE: ICE in lra_assign at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99829 --- Comment #6 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Created attachment 57683 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57683&action=edit Preprocessed source file. I was able to reproduce the ICE on my x86_64 laptop with the following comma

[Bug target/99829] MVE: ICE in lra_assign at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99829 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot o

[Bug analyzer/111802] [14 Regression] New analyser diagram failures since commit b365e9d57ad4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111802 --- Comment #5 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- I can confirm this is fixed in our setup. Thank you!

[Bug analyzer/111802] New analyser diagram failures since commit b365e9d57ad4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111802 --- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Thank you for responding. Yes, I checked commit 5266f930bed0 ("Daily bump.") from yesterday and it's still present.

[Bug target/113526] [14 Regression] gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c fails since gcc-14-7248-g76bc70387d9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113526 --- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- I verified the fix here. Thank you!

[Bug target/113611] New: [14 Regression] gcc.dg/pr110279-1.c fails on cross build since gcc-14-5779-g746344dd538

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113611 Bug ID: 113611 Summary: [14 Regression] gcc.dg/pr110279-1.c fails on cross build since gcc-14-5779-g746344dd538 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/113526] New: [14 Regression ARM] gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c fails since gcc-14-7248-g76bc70387d9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113526 Bug ID: 113526 Summary: [14 Regression ARM] gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c fails since gcc-14-7248-g76bc70387d9 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug rtl-optimization/113510] [ARM Thumb] ICE in extract_constrain_insn with CPU cortex-m23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113510 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/113510] [ARM Thumb] ICE in extract_constrain_insn with CPU cortex-m23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113510 --- Comment #1 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Created attachment 57168 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57168&action=edit Preprocessed version of pr71494.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/113510] New: [ARM Thumb] ICE in extract_constrain_insn with CPU cortex-m23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113510 Bug ID: 113510 Summary: [ARM Thumb] ICE in extract_constrain_insn with CPU cortex-m23 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug analyzer/111802] New: New analyser diagram failures since commit b365e9d57ad4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111802 Bug ID: 111802 Summary: New analyser diagram failures since commit b365e9d57ad4 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug testsuite/111071] [14 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle-asm.exp has new failures since commit e7a36e4715c7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111071 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/111125] [14 Regression] tree-ssa.exp and vect.exp failures after commit r14-3281-g99b5921bfc8f91

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25 --- Comment #8 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Confirmed. All the failures I reported are fixed in trunk. Thank you!

[Bug middle-end/111125] New: tree-ssa.exp and vect.exp failures after commit 99b5921bfc8f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25 Bug ID: 25 Summary: tree-ssa.exp and vect.exp failures after commit 99b5921bfc8f Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/111071] gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle-asm.exp has new failures since commit e7a36e4715c7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111071 --- Comment #1 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Created attachment 55761 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55761&action=edit gcc.log from commit a32de58c9e63, parent of e7a36e4715c

[Bug target/111071] New: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle-asm.exp has new failures since commit e7a36e4715c7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111071 Bug ID: 111071 Summary: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle-asm.exp has new failures since commit e7a36e4715c7 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/110796] builtin_iseqsig fails some tests in armv8l-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796 --- Comment #10 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #8) > (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #6) > > Is the exception status supposed to be in a defined state when the test > > runs? Shouldn

[Bug target/110796] builtin_iseqsig fails some tests in armv8l-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796 --- Comment #7 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #5) > OK, so it signals FE_INVALID on the first test. Can you run this with the > same options, and see what happens? It ran normally: thiago.baue

[Bug target/110796] builtin_iseqsig fails some tests in armv8l-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796 --- Comment #4 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Thanks for looking into this. (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #3) > Do the failure only occur at -Os? Only at -Os. The FAILs I mentioned in the bug report are the only ones that

[Bug target/110796] builtin_iseqsig fails some tests in armv8l-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796 --- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Thanks for the quick response! (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Does pr91323.c fail on arm? No, all its tests pass: PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -O0 (test for excess errors) PAS

[Bug middle-end/110796] New: builtin_iseqsig fails some tests in armv8l-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796 Bug ID: 110796 Summary: builtin_iseqsig fails some tests in armv8l-linux-gnueabihf Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug target/110727] [14 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/sve/aarch64-sve.exp has two new failures since commit 061f74c0673

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110727 --- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Thanks! I confirmed that I can't reproduce the problem anymore in trunk.

[Bug tree-optimization/110742] [14 Regression] cc1plus ICE "Floating point exception" during SLP and profiled bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742 --- Comment #15 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Thanks! I confirmed that I can't reproduce the problem anymore in trunk.

[Bug testsuite/110756] [14 Regression] commit g:92d1425ca78 causes failures in g++.dg/gomp/pr58567.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110756 --- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Ah! Thanks for the analysis. Should I submit the following patch to the mailing list then? diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/pr58567.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/pr58567.C index 35a5bb027ffe.

[Bug c++/110756] New: [14 Regression] commit g:92d1425ca78 causes failures in g++.dg/gomp/pr58567.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110756 Bug ID: 110756 Summary: [14 Regression] commit g:92d1425ca78 causes failures in g++.dg/gomp/pr58567.C Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug preprocessor/103902] GCC requires a space between string-literal and identifier in a literal-operator-id where the identifier is not in basic character set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902 --- Comment #12 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- I confirmed that this fixed the failures I was seeing. Thanks again!

[Bug preprocessor/103902] GCC requires a space between string-literal and identifier in a literal-operator-id where the identifier is not in basic character set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902 --- Comment #10 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- (In reply to Lewis Hyatt from comment #9) > Thanks, sorry about that, I need to replace "unsigned long" with "size_t". > Will fix it. No problem. Thank you!

[Bug preprocessor/103902] GCC requires a space between string-literal and identifier in a literal-operator-id where the identifier is not in basic character set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot

[Bug tree-optimization/110742] [14 Regression] cc1plus ICE "Floating point exception" during SLP and profiled bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742 --- Comment #10 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Thank you very much for digging into this!

[Bug c++/110742] [14 Regression] cc1plus ICE "Floating point exception" during profiled bootstrap since commit 08b99fe8ad6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742 --- Comment #1 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Created attachment 55584 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55584&action=edit Preprocessed ira.cc.

[Bug c++/110742] New: [14 Regression] cc1plus ICE "Floating point exception" during profiled bootstrap since commit 08b99fe8ad6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742 Bug ID: 110742 Summary: [14 Regression] cc1plus ICE "Floating point exception" during profiled bootstrap since commit 08b99fe8ad6 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug target/110727] New: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/aarch64-sve.exp has two new failures since commit 061f74c0673

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110727 Bug ID: 110727 Summary: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/aarch64-sve.exp has two new failures since commit 061f74c0673 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug tree-optimization/110371] [14 Regression] gfortran ICE "verify_gimple failed" in gfortran.dg/vect/pr51058-2.f90 since r14-2007

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110371 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/110371] gfortran ICE "verify_gimple failed" in gfortran.dg/vect/pr51058-2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110371 --- Comment #1 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Created attachment 55388 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55388&action=edit Dump file. This is the dump file generated by the -freport-bug run from the previous attachment.

[Bug fortran/110371] New: gfortran ICE "verify_gimple failed" in gfortran.dg/vect/pr51058-2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110371 Bug ID: 110371 Summary: gfortran ICE "verify_gimple failed" in gfortran.dg/vect/pr51058-2.f90 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/110308] [14 Regression] ICE on audiofile-0.3.6: RTL: vartrack: Segmentation fault in mode_to_precision(machine_mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110308 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot