https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #38 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06a191027749834e628f2c2bdd2256108bf532e9
commit r10-8992-g06a191027749834e628f2c2bdd2256108bf532e9
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #37 from Peter Bergner ---
Fixed on trunk. I'll let this bake a week before backporting the rs6000 part
of the fix to GCC 10 (approved by Segher).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #36 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84cc3370d6d5972fe495b2114fb32f7b4a49a98d
commit r11-4193-g84cc3370d6d5972fe495b2114fb32f7b4a49a98d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #35 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Send it to gcc-patches@ please, with explanation and everything?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #34 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #32)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #31)
> > > > Is this really the correct fix?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Just to verify, this is an approval for Andrew's patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On October 20, 2020 4:16:37 PM GMT+02:00, "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
>
>--- Comment #32 from Peter Bergner ---
>(In reply to Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #32 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #31)
> (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #30)
> > On 10/19/20 6:40 PM, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #31 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #30)
> On 10/19/20 6:40 PM, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
> >
> > --- Comment #28 from Peter Bergner ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #30 from Andrew Macleod ---
On 10/19/20 6:40 PM, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
>
> --- Comment #28 from Peter Bergner ---
> (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #25)
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #29 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e02de946125c36871bd4d8eff21f7f88f01a8aa
commit r11-4080-g6e02de946125c36871bd4d8eff21f7f88f01a8aa
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #28 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #25)
> Wonder if it was suppose to be something like:
>
>
>/* Vector pair and vector quad support. */
>if (TARGET_EXTRA_BUILTINS)
> {
> - tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #27 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #26)
> (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #25)
> > Wonder if it was suppose to be something like:
>
> Maybe? :-) I'll report back how the build does with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #26 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #25)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #24)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22)
> > >tree oi_uns_type = make_unsigned_type (256);
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #25 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #24)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22)
> >tree oi_uns_type = make_unsigned_type (256);
> > - vector_pair_type_node =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #24 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22)
>tree oi_uns_type = make_unsigned_type (256);
> - vector_pair_type_node = build_distinct_type_copy (oi_uns_type);
>SET_TYPE_MODE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #23 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22)
> OK, so the fix here is quite obviously to simply drop the
> build_distinct_type_copy calls:
Thanks richi, I'll put the patch through a bootstrap/regtest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #20)
> >
> >Is this your preferred solution?
>
> The backen should use more lowlevel functions to build this type rather than
> copying from a type that isn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On October 16, 2020 5:46:28 PM GMT+02:00, amacleod at redhat dot com
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
>
>--- Comment #19 from Andrew Macleod ---
>(In reply to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #18)
> On October 16, 2020 4:17:43 PM GMT+02:00, amacleod at redhat dot com
>
> >
> >Yeah, I haven't tripped over it in ADA. This was a 512 byte quad on the
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On October 16, 2020 4:17:43 PM GMT+02:00, amacleod at redhat dot com
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
>
>--- Comment #17 from Andrew Macleod ---
>(In reply to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #16)
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2020, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
> >
> > --- Comment #15 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
>
> --- Comment #15 from Andrew Macleod ---
> Well it seems far more incorrect that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Macleod ---
Well it seems far more incorrect that types_compatible_p () is FALSE for a type
and its MIN/MAX value?
Whats the point of MIN/MAX if you cant count on them being the right types, or
at least conmpatible.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
But that's just a waste of memory ... the expectation that the min/max values
are of the same type is simply wrong.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Macleod ---
Created attachment 49386
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49386=edit
Patch to create integral MAX and MiN
Joy. I'll try it and see what happens.
And back to the first problem where
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #10)
> Here's elf32-arc.i creduced.
>
> a;
> b();
> c() {
> void *d;
> if (d == b && e())
is that actually allowed?
if (d == b) is
void * == (void * ())
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra ---
Here's elf32-arc.i creduced.
a;
b();
c() {
void *d;
if (d == b && e())
d = a;
return d;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #8)
> Note that the error reported in comment #1 is on x86_64-linux.
So please provide one more test-case which can be reproduced on
x86_64-linux-gnu.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #6 from Aldy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 49347
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49347=edit
original .i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 49346
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49346=edit
reduced testcase
-mcpu=power10 -O2 -S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Summary|ICE in
39 matches
Mail list logo
