On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 10:45:11AM +0800, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> 2015-01-30 Thomas Preud'homme
>
> PR middle-end/62103
> * tree-ssa-sccvn.c (fully_constant_vn_reference_p): Use TYPE_PRECISION
> to compute size of referenced value in the constant case.
>
> 2015-01-30 Tho
PR64817's testcase creates a long chain of XOR of AND of XOR of AND of
that our rtl simplifiers can't simplify, although they are simplifyable.
combine manages to simplify the generated insns that perform the
computation represented by such chains, but simplify-rtx doesn't.
That's because combine
We have a problem in simplify_binary_operation_1 that causes memory
waste in general, and memory explosion in pathological testcases such as
that of PR64817, with large exprs amounting to XOR of AND of XOR of AND
of...
I believe rtl simplifiers are not supposed to allocate rtl before
committing to
PR64817 is lucky that the compare in the testcase was <0 rather than
>0. expand_debug_expr used to take the signedness of the expr from the
result type, rather than from the operand types, so it the a < 0 test
was expanded as LTU rather than LT, and LTU compares with zero are
always false, so we s
Ping^3. Should I be addressing this to someone else?
-cary
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
> Ping^2.
>
> -cary
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
>> Ping?
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Cary Coutant wrote:
>>> This patch adds support for the
The plugin is not supposed to call release_input_file from the
claim_file handler. That interface is only for releasing a file
descriptor obtained via get_input_file during the all_symbols_read
callback. When the linker calls the claim_file handler, the file
descriptor is open, and the plugin is re
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-58.c scan-assembler-not pow
>
> $ grep pow builtins-58.s
> .machine power4
Any suggestions?
- David
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 02/03/15 01:29, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hmm, if I understand correctly, it's a code size regression, so I
>> don't think it's appropriate to adapt the test case. Either the patch
>> or something else in GCC is doing wrong, right?
>>
>> Hi Al
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 6:39 PM
>
> You should mention
> PR middle-end/62103
Right, please find the new ChangeLog entries below:
2015-01-30 Thomas Preud'homme
PR middle-end/62103
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (fully_const
This is a large patch mostly written by Andrew to change how constraints
are stored. It brings the implementation more in line with the
specification and simplifies some parts.
I'm not entirely sure about the change to
cp_parser_template_argument_list. What happens here is when a template
t
> optabs.c's expand_abs_nojump already knows this trick:
>
> /* If this machine has expensive jumps, we can do integer absolute
>value of X as (((signed) x >> (W-1)) ^ x) - ((signed) x >> (W-1)),
>where W is the width of MODE. */
>
> So if you define BRANCH_COST to be 2 or more ther
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:03:14PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> So we aren't SYMBOL_REF_EXTERNAL_P nor
>> SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P. What do we reference?
>
> That is reasonable. There is no guarantee the extern weak symbol is local,
> it could very we
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:14:49AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> > PR target/64876
> > * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (chain_already_loaded): New function.
> > (rs6000_call_aix): Use it.
>
> Okay with Jakub's suggested change.
Kaz Kojima wrote:
> 2015-01-27 Joern Rennecke
> Kaz Kojima
>
> PR target/64761
> * config/sh/sh-protos.h (sh_can_redirect_branch): Don't declare.
> * config/sh/sh.c (TARGET_CAN_FOLLOW_JUMP): Redefine.
> (sh_can_redirect_branch): Rename to ...
> (sh_can
Hi,
Several goacc/acc_on_device tests fail for a few targets:
hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 (PR testsuite/64850)
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-01/msg02659.html
m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-01/msg02960.html
sh4-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 03:08:01PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 12:27:35AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> > @@ -33002,7 +33092,9 @@ rs6000_call_aix (rtx value, rtx func_desc, rtx fla
> > originally direct, the 3rd word has not been written since no
> > trampol
FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-58.c scan-assembler-not pow
$ grep pow builtins-58.s
.machine power4
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
This patch is missing pieces such as Texinfo documentation (in
invoke.texi for target-specific options, at least) and config-list.mk
update so automatic builders verify that this target builds OK. See
"Back End" in sourcebuild.texi and make sure that you have everything
relevant.
It's a good idea
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:03:14PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> So we aren't SYMBOL_REF_EXTERNAL_P nor
> SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P. What do we reference?
That is reasonable. There is no guarantee the extern weak symbol is local,
it could very well be non-local. All that you know about the symbols is
that i
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:29 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:25:38AM -0800, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>
I've committed the following typo fix to both 4.9 and 5.0.
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 220347)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+2015-02-03 Steven G. Kargl
+
+ * intrinsic.texi (CO_ASSOCIATED)
The libgo/go/go/types directory was removed in July 2013.
Unfortunately I accidentally left the testdata directory behind. This
patch removes it. Committed to mainline.
Ian
diff -r 85d0b689bd17 libgo/go/go/types/testdata/builtins.src
--- a/libgo/go/go/types/testdata/builtins.src Mon Feb 02 19:
Dear Dominique,
I have fixed all the problems except the last one. For that case, the
other brand gives
type_to_class_30.f90(19): error #7822: Variables containing ultimate
allocatable array components are forbidden from appearing directly in
input/output lists.
print *, TestReference([Test(99), T
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:29 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:25:38AM -0800, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
This was the original patch to i386.c to let global accesses
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:25:38AM -0800, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>>> This was the original patch to i386.c to let global accesses take
>>> advantage of copy relocations and avoid the
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:25:38AM -0800, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>> This was the original patch to i386.c to let global accesses take
>> advantage of copy relocations and avoid the GOT.
>>
>>
>> @@ -13113,7 +13113,11 @@ legitimate_pic_address
Hi,
When the result values of atomic ops, such as the previous value of an
atomic_fetch_add, are unused, it's possible to use shorter asm sequences
on SH. The attached patch does that by checking the reg unused notes of
the insns in split1 and replacing them with the simpler variants, if the
resu
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Lynn A. Boger
wrote:
>
> I've been experimenting with the go tools and how to make them work for
> cross gccgo builds.
>
> In golang I think there is just one 'go' tool and the cross build targets
> are specified by the setting of GOARCH and GOOS. So why couldn't
On 03 Feb 13:00, Julian Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 14:28:44 +0300
> Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > On 27 Jan 14:07, Julian Brown wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:34:26 +0300
> > > Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > > > Here is my current patch, it works for OpenMP->MIC, but obviously
> > > > will not work
Hi,
I've been experimenting with the go tools and how to make them work for
cross gccgo builds.
In golang I think there is just one 'go' tool and the cross build
targets are specified by the setting of GOARCH and GOOS. So why
couldn't the same be done with gccgo?
That means, on any given
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:25:38AM -0800, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> This was the original patch to i386.c to let global accesses take
> advantage of copy relocations and avoid the GOT.
>
>
> @@ -13113,7 +13113,11 @@ legitimate_pic_address_disp_p (rtx disp)
> return true;
> }
>else if (!
It seems prudent to have the jit's log files contain information on
the values of the various options in use.
This patch adds logging when options are changed, and logs the value
of all options when a compile is started (and no-ops for the common
case when no logging is enabled).
Tested via "make
+davidxl +ccoutant
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:46 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
> It would probably help reviewers if you pointed to
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:46 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
It would probably help reviewers if you pointed to actual path
submission [1], which unfortunately contains the explanation
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 19:59 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:50:40 +0100, Doug Evans wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jan Kratochvil
> > wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > It is wrong that gcc puts -fpreprocessed into DW_AT_producer - I may post
> > > a gcc
> > > patch for i
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:50:40 +0100, Doug Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jan Kratochvil
> wrote:
> > [...]
> > It is wrong that gcc puts -fpreprocessed into DW_AT_producer - I may post a
> > gcc
> > patch for it.
>
> Hi.
> I wasn't aware there are now rules for what can and canno
On 01/27/15 02:36, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
As explained in PR64796, code for bswap64 effective target computes the answer
once and then cache. However the result depends on the flags passed to the
compiler and with --target_board it's possible to test several sets of flags.
Besides, this cod
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
> [...]
> It is wrong that gcc puts -fpreprocessed into DW_AT_producer - I may post a
> gcc
> patch for it.
Hi.
I wasn't aware there are now rules for what can and cannot go in DW_AT_producer.
DW_AT_producer has gone from being informational
On 01/30/15 15:18, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes two more cases where alias chain should be followed to emit
correct assembler name for instrumented functions. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-01-30 Ilya Enkovich
On 01/27/15 07:27, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
I've grepped for BUILT_IN_.*_CHKP in the sources and we actually need
far fewer enum values than the 1204 that are being defined.
This patch requires builtins.def to say explicitly (by using
DEF_*BUILTIN_CHKP macro instead of corresponding DEF_*BUILTI
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Suchanek [mailto:robert.sucha...@imgtec.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 11:18 AM
> To: Richard Sandiford
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Matthew Fortune; Moore, Catherine
> Subject: RE: [PATCH MIPS RFA] Regression cleanup for nan2008 toolchain
>
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Paul Richard Thomas
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> The highly embarrassing bug in mold = allocations to class entities
> has been fixed in revisions 220140 and 220191 for trunk and 4.9
> respectively. The PR has been set as RESOLVED.
>
This bug fix may have caused:
https
On 06/01/15 09:40, Mantas Mikaitis wrote:
>
> Ping and changelog spaces removed.
>
> Thank you,
> Mantas M.
>
> On 18/11/14 11:58, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 18/11/14 11:30, Mantas Mikaitis wrote:
>>> Incorrect predefinitions for certain target architectures. E.g. arm7-m
>>> does not contain
On 02/03/15 01:29, Bin.Cheng wrote:
Hmm, if I understand correctly, it's a code size regression, so I
don't think it's appropriate to adapt the test case. Either the patch
or something else in GCC is doing wrong, right?
Hi Alex, could you please file a PR with full dump information for trackin
On 02/03/2015 11:14 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ /* Avoid -Waddress warnings (c++/64877). */
+ TREE_NO_WARNING (pfn0) = 1;
I'd check for ADDR_EXPR before doing this; OK with that change.
Jason
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> This fixes a large number of Go testsuite failures on powerpc64 ELFv1,
> caused by loading r11 from a function descriptor and thus trashing the
> value set up from CALL_EXPR_STATIC_CHAIN. So don't load r11 if it
> already contains a useful value
Hi,
On 02/03/2015 03:19 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/03/2015 05:45 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ if (TREE_CODE (pfn0) != ADDR_EXPR
+ || !decl_with_nonnull_addr_p (TREE_OPERAND (pfn0, 0)))
I don't like duplicating the logic for when we might know the pfn is
non-null; that see
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 05:26:23PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:54:46PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > +/* Highest pseudo for which we track REG_N_SETS. */
>> > +static unsigned int reg_n_sets_max;
>>
>> O
Hi all,
The ICE in this PR occurs when -mtune=xscale triggers a particular path
through arm_gen_constant during expand
that creates a 0xf00f mask but for a 64-bit HOST_WIDE_INT doesn't
sign extend it into
0xf00f that signifies the required -4081. It leaves it as
0xf00f (429
On 03/02/2015 07:05, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Likewise of:
> +(define_insn "abssi2"
> + [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
> + (abs:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")))
> + (clobber (match_scratch:SI 2 "=&r"))]
> + ""
> + "ashr.l\t%2,%1,31\;xor.l\t%0,%1,%2\;sub.l\t%
The original reason for this was to fix the missing space before "@var{z}".
"Do a combined multiply ... and then" didn't sound quite right though:
"and then" implies a separate step and so feels like a contradiction
of "combined".
Tested with "make doc html pdf". OK to install?
Thanks,
Richard
The thumb2_reorg code:
if (!OBJECT_P (src))
op0 = XEXP (src, 0);
causes an rtl checking failure if SRC is an UNSPEC. This doesn't matter
in practice without rtl checking since OP0 is only used if SRC is a unary
or binary operator. This patch tightens the condition to reflect that.
On 02/03/2015 05:45 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ if (TREE_CODE (pfn0) != ADDR_EXPR
+ || !decl_with_nonnull_addr_p (TREE_OPERAND (pfn0, 0)))
I don't like duplicating the logic for when we might know the pfn is
non-null; that seems fragile. I'd rather go with the tf_no
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 12:27:35AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> +static bool
> +chain_already_loaded (rtx_insn *last)
> +{
> + if (last != NULL)
> +{
> + rtx patt = PATTERN (last);
> +
> + if (GET_CODE (patt) == SET)
> + {
> + rtx lhs = XEXP (patt, 0);
> +
> + if (REG_P
This fixes a large number of Go testsuite failures on powerpc64 ELFv1,
caused by loading r11 from a function descriptor and thus trashing the
value set up from CALL_EXPR_STATIC_CHAIN. So don't load r11 if it
already contains a useful value. Whether r11 has been set is found
directly by examining
On 01/02/15 15:08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I failed to CC gcc-patches on this patch ...
On 29/01/15 13:02 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++200x/all_attributes.cc
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++200x/all_attributes.cc
new file mod
> On Feb 3, 2015, at 3:57 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> While trying to build the GCC 5 with GCC 5, I ran into an ICE when
>> building libcpp at -O0. The problem is the C++ front-end was not
>> folding sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) when passed to a function at -O0. The
>>
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 14:28:44 +0300
Ilya Verbin wrote:
> Hi Julian!
>
> On 27 Jan 14:07, Julian Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:34:26 +0300
> > Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > > Here is my current patch, it works for OpenMP->MIC, but obviously
> > > will not work for PTX, since it requires symmetr
On 03/02/15 08:29, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 02/02/15 08:59, Alex Velenko wrote:
On 11/10/14 13:44, Felix Yang wrote:
Hello Jeff,
I see that you have improved the RTL typesafety issue for ira.c,
so I rebased this patch
on the latest tru
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015, Jeff Law wrote:
> +/* Given a bit-wise operation performed in mode P1 on operands
> + in some narrower type P2 that feeds an outer masking operation.
> + See if the mask turns off all the bits outside P2, and if so
> + perform the all the operations in P2 and just convert
Andrew Pinski wrote:
While trying to build the GCC 5 with GCC 5, I ran into an ICE when
building libcpp at -O0. The problem is the C++ front-end was not
folding sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) when passed to a function at -O0. The
C++ front-end keeps around sizeof until the gimplifier and there is no
wa
On February 2, 2015 7:32:15 PM CET, Jeff Law wrote:
>On 02/02/15 01:57, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> The nice thing about wrapping the result inside a convert is the
>types for
>>> the inner operations will propagate from the type of the inner
>operands,
>>> which is exactly what we want. We the
Hi Julian!
On 27 Jan 14:07, Julian Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:34:26 +0300
> Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > Here is my current patch, it works for OpenMP->MIC, but obviously
> > will not work for PTX, since it requires symmetrical changes in the
> > plugin. Could you please take a look, whethe
Hi,
On 02/03/2015 11:40 AM, Matthew Wahab wrote:
Ok to commit?
Ok thanks.
Paolo.
Hi,
Manuel did most of the work on this [5 Regression], caused by my fix for
c++/43906, which extended a lot the functionality of -Waddress: a
spurious warning is emitted with -Waddress for an expression internally
generated in cp_build_binary_op. Manuel suggested that when safe we
could comp
> 2015-02-02 Jakub Jelinek
>
> PR rtl-optimization/64756
> * cse.c (cse_insn): If dest != SET_DEST (sets[i].rtl) and
> HASH (SET_DEST (sets[i].rtl), mode) computation sets do_not_record,
> invalidate and do not record it.
>
> * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64756.c: New
On 03/02/15 10:27, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Nit: the path should be * testsuite/28_regex/... and likewise for the
other testcase, because it starts where is the corresponding ChangeLog.
Fixed changelog:
libstdc++-v3/
2015-02-02 Matthew Wahab
PR libstdc++/64467
* testsuite/28_re
Hi Jonathan,
On 1 Feb 2015, at 15:10, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 01/02/15 15:08 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> I failed to CC gcc-patches on this patch ...
>>
>> On 29/01/15 13:02 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> Jakub pointed out that we have some attributes that don't use the
>>> reserved
Hi,
On 02/03/2015 11:17 AM, Matthew Wahab wrote:
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/
2015-02-02 Matthew Wahab
PR libstdc++/64467
* 28_regex/traits/char/isctype.cc (test01): Add newlib special
case for '\n'.
* 28_regex/traits/wchar_t/isctype.cc (test01): Likewise.
Nit: the path should be
[Email problems so resending to the list, sorry for multiple copies.]
On 02/02/15 16:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 2 February 2015 at 16:17, Paolo Carlini wrote:
This is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467 so please
note that in the ChangeLog.
I guess the patch is Ok for trunk
As discovered by Rainer, an oversight in sparc_rtx_costs causes the function
to return very high costs for multiply operations with -m64 for default V9 or
new processors (when TARGET_DEPRECATED_V8_INSNS is not set to be precise).
Fixed by the attached patch to config/sparc/sparc.c, the config/sp
> Changed in my copy to
> /* One plus the highest pseudo for which we track REG_N_SETS. */
>
> Ok with that change?
OK if you also add (part of) the explanation you wrote down in the opening
message to the above comment.
--
Eric Botcazou
Hi all,
This patch simply remove the target selector. It should pass for all target
which applies.
The comment in the code is not correct. stderr is redirected, not the stdout.
Therefore, the return status which is streamed into stdout should properly
captured even by wrapped target.
Okay f
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:49:19AM -0800, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> As discussed in PR61225, we won't be able to fix the minor regression here
> for GCC 5, so let's XFAIL this test for ia32.
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux -m32 and -m64. Okay for mainline?
>
>
> Segher
>
>
> 2015-02-03 Segher B
As discussed in PR61225, we won't be able to fix the minor regression here
for GCC 5, so let's XFAIL this test for ia32.
Tested on x86_64-linux -m32 and -m64. Okay for mainline?
Segher
2015-02-03 Segher Boessenkool
gcc/testsuite/
PR middle-end/61225
gcc.target/i386/pr49095
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> Some compilers IIRC use !DIR$ unroll, if memory serves me right then
> the DEC compiler had !DEC$ unroll.
> We could support one or the other three-letter keyword or maybe not.
Intel's compiler supports quite a lot of loop directives. (Its Fortran
front end is bas
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 02/02/15 08:59, Alex Velenko wrote:
>>
>> On 11/10/14 13:44, Felix Yang wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Jeff,
>>>
>>> I see that you have improved the RTL typesafety issue for ira.c,
>>> so I rebased this patch
>>> on the latest trunk and change
77 matches
Mail list logo
