Ping?
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:06 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan;
> Marcus Shawcroft
> Subject: [PATCH,
On 09/02/15 23:17, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, Matthew Wahab wrote:
Attached a patch to replace the test for macro __NEWLIB__ with a test for
macro NEWLINE_IN_CLASS_BLANK, defined by
{ dg-additional-options "-DNEWLINE_IN_CLASS_BLANK" { target newlib } }
Tested with check-tar
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 02:04:04PM +, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:32:45PM +, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> > Ok for stage 4?
>
> This is a regression from 4.9, so once we iron out some nits, it should
> be.
>
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (*
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00141.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 03/02/15 15:18, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
The ICE in this PR occurs when -mtune=xscale triggers a particular path
through arm_gen_constant during expand
that creates a 0xf00f mask but for a 64-bit HOST_WI
The vectorizer cost model has a serious issue in not dealing well with
targets using scalar stmt cost != 1. This is because it passes
scalar iteration _cost_ to routines scaling that cost with the targets
scalar stmt cost again. This is for example visible on x86_64 for
all AMD archs which use h
LTO bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2015-02-10 Richard Biener
* tree-streamer.h (streamer_read_tree_bitfields): Adjust.
* tree-streamer-in.c (streamer_read_tree_bitfields): Do not
return the bitpack.
Index: gcc/tree-streamer.h
Oleg Endo wrote:
> The attached patch fixes the lost mem aliasing info for atomic ops on SH
> and allows the utilization of reg+disp address modes for atomic ops.
> Actually it was supposed to be a pretty straight forward patch that just
> replaces the open coded 'mem:QIHISI (match_operand:SI
> "a
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> The second time I missed patch in one day, I hate myself.
> Here it is.
I think the patch is reasonable but I would have used a default = NULL
arg for 'stop' to make the patch smaller. You don't constrain 'stop'
to being an SSA name - any parti
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:22:44AM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Currently if a target* pragma appears within a target region, GCC successfully
> compiles such code (with a warning). But the binary fails at run-time, since
> it
> tries to call GOMP_target* functions on target.
>
> Th
Hi Jan-Benedict,
Seems you accidentally committed quite some more code you're currently
working on in that very commit, which is now breaking
Doh! Yes, sorry about that. I have now reverted the DIV attribute part
of the patch. (I am hoping that this work will be ready for
contributing soo
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> The second time I missed patch in one day, I hate myself.
>> Here it is.
>
> I think the patch is reasonable but I would have used a default = NULL
> arg for 'stop' to make the patch smal
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:16:22AM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:22:44AM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > Currently if a target* pragma appears within a target region, GCC
> > successfully
> > compiles such code (with a warning). But the binary fails at run-time,
> > sinc
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:45:40AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> > On 11/20/14 05:33, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Now that I've managed to put together and test all the submitted Ope
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>>> The second time I missed patch in one day, I hate myself.
>>> Here it is.
>>
>> I think the patch is reasonable but I would have u
Hi!
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:20:24 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:16:22AM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:22:44AM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > > Currently if a target* pragma appears within a target region, GCC
> > > successfully
> > > compiles
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
Behalf Of Jeff Law
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 5:03 AM
To: Bin.Cheng
Cc: Alex Velenko; Felix Yang; Yangfei (Felix); Marcus Shawcroft; GCC Patches;
vmaka...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATC
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>>> +&& DECL_CONTEXT (snode->decl)
>>> +&& TREE_CODE (DECL_CONTEXT (snode->decl)) != FUNCTION_DECL)
>>
>>
>> I think this should be !decl_function_context (snode->decl), in case
>> there's a class or BLOCK between the symbol and its e
Hello.
Following patch is fix for PR ipa/64813. The patch was tested on a darwin target
by Dominique.
Ready for trunk?
Thanks,
Martin
>From ce1c7031e2616d840ce9c1bc45587d64134f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mliska
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:12:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Handle noreturn funct
We've performed a mass rebuild for Fedora, so I'm updating the porting
to document with the following.
Index: porting_to.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-5/porting_to.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 porting_
On 09-02-15 20:01, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
Le 9 févr. 2015 à 19:10, Tom de Vries mailto:tom_devr...@mentor.com>> a écrit :
On 09-02-15 18:23, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
Tom,
After these changes I have the following regressions on
x86_64-apple-darwin1[04]*:
FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-19.c (tes
Hi!
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:40:40 +0100, I wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 08:41:28 +0900 (JST), Kaz Kojima
> wrote:
> > Several goacc/acc_on_device tests fail for a few targets:
> >
> > hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 (PR testsuite/64850)
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-01/msg02659.html
> >
On 02/10/2015 11:34 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Bernds patch is ok with the unrelated gcc.c hunk removed.
Thanks. I'm assuming this is for the next stage 1?
Bernd
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 01:06:15PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 02/10/2015 11:34 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> >Bernds patch is ok with the unrelated gcc.c hunk removed.
>
> Thanks. I'm assuming this is for the next stage 1?
No, for current trunk, we don't want to ship with offloading
to nvp
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Following patch is fix for PR ipa/64813. The patch was tested on a darwin
> target
> by Dominique.
>
> Ready for trunk?
- if (!(gimple_call_flags (call) & ECF_NORETURN))
+ if (!alias_is_noreturn)
that was technically un
The following fixes PR64955 where we forgot to valueize VOPs before
using them as value-number.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
Richard.
2015-10-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/64995
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (set_ssa_val_to): Assert that the
On Feb 10, 2015, at 7:16 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 02/06/15 05:24, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>>
>> ---
>> 2015-02-06 James Greenhalgh
>>
>> * haifa-sched.c (recompute_todo_spec): After applying a
>> replacement and cancelling a dependency, also clear the
>> SCHED_GROUP_P flag.
>
From: tbsaunde
In the testcase the block with problematic frequency has to incoming
edges. Each edge has probability 1. The first edge's source bb has
frequency 873/1, and the second has a frequency of 9409/1. So
at least one of those is slightly high probably from some sort of roundin
On 02/10/15 03:51, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
R110 can have the value -1 (BB6, BB7, BB8) or 0 (BB5). Thus there is no single
value across the entire function that one can validly use for r110.
Does the value of R110 should not change across all the callee path from the
given caller functions.
On 02/10/2015 01:50 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
Following patch is fix for PR ipa/64813. The patch was tested on a darwin
target
by Dominique.
Ready for trunk?
- if (!(gimple_call_flags (call) & ECF_NORETURN))
+ if (!alias
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:56:40PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 02/10/2015 01:50 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>Hello.
> >>
> >>Following patch is fix for PR ipa/64813. The patch was tested on a darwin
> >>target
> >>by Dominique.
> >>
> >
Hi,
As is already done for mips and hppa, we should XFAIL this test on
AArch64 as we don't currently use the store_by_pieces infrastructure.
We may in future want to tweak this, but for GCC 5.0 the safe thing
to do is just to XFAIL the test.
Tested with aarch64-none-elf.
OK?
Thanks,
James
--
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'cpplib' has been submitted
by the Esperanto team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/cpplib/eo.po
(This file, 'cpplib-5.1-b201502
cpplib-5.1-b20150208.eo.po.gz
Description: Binary data
The Translation Project robot, in the
name of your translation coordinator.
Hi,
this patch adds optimization attribute to fstack-reuse that is obviously
per-function.
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, commited as obvious.
Honza
Index: common.opt
===
--- common.opt (revision 220586)
+++ common.opt (work
On 02/09/2015 08:27 AM, Andrea Azzarone wrote:
Please note that this is my first gcc patch
Thanks, looks good! A couple of nits:
* gcc/cp/parser.c: Make sure lookup_literal_operator returns all
the possible candidates. Also improve the diagnostic messages.
A ChangeLog entry should be p
On Feb 10, 2015, at 8:06 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> As is already done for mips and hppa, we should XFAIL this test on
> AArch64 as we don't currently use the store_by_pieces infrastructure.
For this patch, either this is obvious or a target person should weigh in. I’d
only step in if the ta
On 02/10/2015 05:52 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
I also wonder why you restrict it to functions with a GIMPLE body.
Likewise for
struct foo { int i; };
I guess these should depend on -feliminate-unused-debug-symbols and
-feliminate-unused-debug-types.
Jason
Hello!
gfortran.dg/char_length_15.f90 FAILs on non-BWX alpha due to invalid
propagation of memory address into reload_out_aligned insn
pattern.
We start with:
*** char_length_15.f90.228r.reload:
(insn 577 456 460 14 (parallel [
(set (mem/c:QI (plus:DI (reg:DI 6 $6 [358])
The following adds a few new notes.
Ok?
--- porting_to.html 10 Feb 2015 11:12:20 - 1.3
+++ porting_to.html 10 Feb 2015 17:58:52 -
@@ -251,6 +251,99 @@
^
+__STDC_VERSION__ macro
+
+In the C11 mode, the __STDC_VERSION__ standard macro,
+introduced in
Tom,
At -m32 on x86_64-apple-darwin14, the failing test case executes...
% /sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/gcc-5-20150209/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-19.c
-fno-diagnostics
Mike,
Actually there aren't really any darwin bits in the current patch...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00468.html
short of the dg-skip-if adjustments for the unsupported targets.
Jack
ps I wonder if this final patch needs be reposted to gcc-patches as...
On 02/09/2015 12:40 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> #ifndef LIBFFI_ASM
> +#ifdef __ILP32__
> +typedef unsigned long long ffi_arg;
> +typedef signed long long ffi_sarg;
> +#else
You need to set FFI_SIZEOF_ARG too.
Otherwise it looks ok.
r~
On 02/09/2015 12:51 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Would it make more sense to use int64_t rather than long long?
Probably, but we should do that all over libffi, rather than just this one hunk.
r~
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> this patch finally disables the wroarkound in ipa-icf for local functions.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, comitted.
>
> Honza
>
> 2015-02-08 Jan Hubicka
>
> PR ipa/63566
> * ipa-icf.c (set_local): New function
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/09/2015 12:40 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> #ifndef LIBFFI_ASM
>> +#ifdef __ILP32__
>> +typedef unsigned long long ffi_arg;
>> +typedef signed long long ffi_sarg;
>> +#else
>
> You need to set FFI_SIZEOF_ARG too.
>
> Otherwise it lo
Hi!
Internal calls never throw and as shown on the testcase, sometimes
they can make it all the way to check_noexcept_r which was ICEing on those.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2015-02-10 Jakub Jelinek
PR sanitizer/64984
* except.c (chec
Hi!
As ubsan_expand_vptr_ifn points *gsip to the first stmt in the next bb,
we want to always return true as no_next, we never want to gsi_next on it
before processing it further, otherwise we could skip some important
statement (e.g. another UBSAN_* call).
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on
> Hello.
>
> Following patch is fix for PR ipa/64813. The patch was tested on a darwin
> target
> by Dominique.
>
> Ready for trunk?
OK,
Honza
> Thanks,
> Martin
> >From ce1c7031e2616d840ce9c1bc45587d64134f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: mliska
> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:12:59 +0100
> S
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> this patch finally enables local functions for functions with aliases and
> thunks.
>
> Honza
>
> PR ipa/63566
> * ipa-visibility.c (cgraph_node::non_local_p): Accept aliases.
> (cgraph_node::local_p): Remove thunk
On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 18:35 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Oleg Endo wrote:
> > The attached patch fixes the lost mem aliasing info for atomic ops on SH
> > and allows the utilization of reg+disp address modes for atomic ops.
> > Actually it was supposed to be a pretty straight forward patch that just
This PR was originally minor issue where we regressed on this kind of
sequence:
typedef struct toto_s *toto_t;
toto_t add (toto_t a, toto_t b) {
int64_t tmp = (int64_t)(intptr_t)a + ((int64_t)(intptr_t)b&~1L);
return (toto_t)(intptr_t) tmp;
}
There was talk of trying to peephole this in
On 02/07/2015 08:45 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Here is an updated patch.
This is an annoying comment to differentiate 3 different versions, FYI.
> @@ -6826,11 +6817,18 @@ default_binds_local_p_1 (const_tree exp, int shlib)
>&& (TREE_STATIC (exp) || DECL_EXTERNAL (exp)))
> {
>varpoo
On 02/10/2015 11:02 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> +#define FFI_SIZEOF_JAVA_RAW 4
Since aarch64 doesn't implement the raw java api, this is irrelevant.
r~
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> @@ -7445,9 +7465,10 @@ default_elf_asm_output_external (FILE *file
>> ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>> {
>>/* We output the name if and only if TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED is
>> set in order to avoid putting out names that are never really
>>
On February 10, 2015 9:08:33 PM CET, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>As ubsan_expand_vptr_ifn points *gsip to the first stmt in the next bb,
>we want to always return true as no_next, we never want to gsi_next on
>it
>before processing it further, otherwise we could skip some important
>statement (e.
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
> > I don't think it's useful to have the trapping semantics unspecified for a
> > comparison operation like that. So the question is what's most useful for
> > LTGT and LTGT_EXPR to do (presumably they should do the same thing). Lots
> > of existing cod
> But maybe more code treats LTGT as a signaling operation than otherwise, in
> accordance with the original intent, and so that's the most appropriate way
> to document it (with !UNEQ being the representation of the corresponding
> quiet operation).
SPARC supports all codes and treats everything
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
> +Several new warnings have been added to the C front end. One of the new
> +warnings is that GCC now warns about non-standard predefined macros with the
> +-Wpedantic option. For instance:
> +
> +
> + void
> + foo (void)
> + {
> +const char *s =
Dear Mikael, dear all,
Thank you for the previous review. I believe that the attached
responds to all of your comments and correctly compiles the three
testcases that you provided. Two of these have been included in the
original testcase and the third appears separately.
Bootstrapped and reg
test
OK.
Jason
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/10/2015 11:02 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> +#define FFI_SIZEOF_JAVA_RAW 4
>
> Since aarch64 doesn't implement the raw java api, this is irrelevant.
Ok. This is what I applied to GCC after testing it (I don't have
access to the lib
Jeff Law writes:
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Add check_effective_target_pie
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch adds check_effective_target_pie to check if the current
>> multilib generates PIE by default.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> H.J.
>> ---
>> 2015-01-11 H.J. Lu
>>
>> * gcc.target/i386/pie.c: New test.
>
Hi,
Thanks for the review. I updated the patch.
2015-2-9 Andrea Azzarone
PR c++/64959
* parser.c (lookup_literal_operator): Return all candidates.
(cp_parser_userdef_char_literal): Simplify error handling.
(cp_parser_userdef_numeric_literal): Pass tf_warning_or_error.
Hi
When building Ada for RTEMS, you need to pass in the CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET
to see OS specific .h files. This was already done for the RTS but needed to
be added to the process which extracts value settings from the .h files.
This patch is against 4.9. OK to apply to 4.8, 4.9, and head assuming it
I've checked in this patch to fix a couple more typos in the extended
asm documentation, as noted by David.
-Sandra
2015-02-10 Sandra Loosemore
gcc/
* doc/extend.texi (Extended Asm): Fix typos.
Index: gcc/doc/extend.texi
=
Hi David,
Sorry I haven't gotten back to this sooner. I've tried to address your
comments about the previous patch. Please let me know if I'm off base.
Test results are the same as previously.
Thanks,
Bill
[gcc]
2015-02-10 Bill Schmidt
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_option_over
I've committed the attached patch on behalf of David Wohlferd, who has
no commit access. It was originally proposed here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg01365.html
After reviewing that thread, I think the change is conservatively
correct, and since it's a partial revert of one
This fix was suggested by David Wohlferd here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00377.html
I've checked it in as obvious.
-Sandra
2015-02-10 David Wohlferd
Sandra Loosemore
gcc/
* doc/extend.texi (Loop-Specific Pragmas): Fix grammar error.
2015-
This is another small documentation fix suggested by David Wohlferd here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00377.html
I don't think adding cross-references is controversial, so I've checked
in this version.
-Sandra
2015-02-10 David Wohlferd
Sandra Loosemore
(Thanks to everyone for the review. I have reworked the submission as
suggested. This does build cleanly with "--enable-werror-always")
FT32 is a new high performance 32-bit RISC core developed by FTDI for embedded
applications.
Support for FT32 has already been added to binutils. This patch ad
On 02/08/2015 05:10 PM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
The attached patch fixes this by checking for the case when we are doing g0
editing and the exponent is 0.
Regression tested on X86-64. For the larger kinds, we are on a different code
path out of necessity, so we need to address this corner case.
Hi,
This is a simple patch which allows all of the boehm-gc testsuite
that is included with GCC to pass for AARCH64:ILP32.
Basically we need to set CPP_WORDSZ to 32 and the alignment to 4 so we
detect pointers correctly.
OK for GCC? Bootstrapped and tested for aarch64-linux-gnu with no
regressi
On 02/09/15 19:19, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
From: Andrew Pinski [mailto:pins...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:57 AM
+#ifdef SHORT_IMMEDIATES_SIGN_EXTEND
+/* If MODE has a precision lower than PREC and SRC is a non-negative
constant
+ that would appear negative in MODE, sig
Hi,
this segfault in c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-12.c is caused
by fact that we split ltrans units separating call to alias of local function
and its target. Because LTO partitioning turns aliases in boundaries into
normal symbols, we end up checking alias for can_change_signature_
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 2:04 PM
>
> Given the rs6000 is affected, one could do before/after tests natively
> in the gcc farm to ensure that removing that code doesn't change the
> generated code across a bootstrap.
Wouldn't that only tell whe
On 02/03/15 05:23, Joseph Myers wrote:
+&& TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@0)) == TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@1))
+&& TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (@0)) == TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (@1))
+&& TYPE_PRECISION (type) > TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@0)))
+ (convert (bit_and (inner
On 02/10/15 23:42, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 2:04 PM
Given the rs6000 is affected, one could do before/after tests natively
in the gcc farm to ensure that removing that code doesn't change the
generated code across a boot
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 2:49 PM
> >
> > Wouldn't that only tell whether the macro can stay undefined for
> rs6000?
> > MD files for rs6000 could have been tighten since then but not others
> > backend's MD files.
> It's certainly possible, but
> When building Ada for RTEMS, you need to pass in the CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET
> to see OS specific .h files. This was already done for the RTS but needed to
> be added to the process which extracts value settings from the .h files.
>
> This patch is against 4.9. OK to apply to 4.8, 4.9, and head assum
79 matches
Mail list logo
