Hi,
this patch implements the idea. It uses "" for anonymous namespace
types and updates ipa-devirt to rely on it (and also sanity check that).
The patch has bootstrapped/regtested powerpc64le-linux, will commit it
tomorrow if there are no complains to unbreak the Ada LTO bootstrap.
Honza
Dear Andre,
I'll put both points right. Thanks for pointing them out.
Cheers
Paul
On 23 May 2015 at 19:52, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> does this patch apply to current trunk cleanly? I get an issue with the last
> hunk, because all of the prerequisites are gone since r223445. The s
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file, 'gcc-5.1.0.sv.po', has just
Hello,
I don't think this pattern is done in the branch. Here I am trying to
match what is done in fold-const, but the idea is that we can later add an
extra block where we replace (cmp (minus @2 @3) zerop) with (cmp @2 @3),
maybe with some adjustments ("convert?" all over the place), to help
Hi Mikael,
Yes, that's fine for 5 and 6.
Thanks for the patch.
Paul
On 23 May 2015 at 23:35, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For PR 63727, a check was introduced, rejecting procedure pointer
> components used as actual arguments:
> foo(obj%proc_comp)
> but it had the side effect of a
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Now we have it spelled out 4 times ... makes sense to create a new
>> macro for it? (though I cannot think of a good name...
>> UNACCESSIBLE_TYPE_P ()?)
>
> Yep, actually I already made that version of patch yesterday but then got
> hooked by
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 5:49 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>> Now we have it spelled out 4 times ... makes sense to create a new
>>> macro for it? (though I cannot think of a good name...
>>> UNACCESSIBLE_TYPE_P ()?)
>>
>> Yep, actually I already made
I forgot to mention I optimistically tried to write something like this:
(match
(negated_value_for_comparison @0)
(negate @0))
(match
(negated_value_for_comparison (negate @0))
@0)
(match
(negated_value_for_comparison (minus @0 @1))
(if (!HONOR_SIGN_DEPENDENT_ROUNDING (type))
(minus @1 @
Hello,
I noticed we were only doing this transformation for floats and not for
integers, so I took the chance to move it to match.pd. Regtested on
ppc64le-redhat-linux.
2015-05-25 Marc Glisse
* match.pd (swapped_tcc_comparison): New operator list.
(-A CMP -B): New simplifi
Hello!
> This patch removes the special casing for targets with relaxed memory
> ordering and handles
> guard accesses with equivalent atomic load acquire operations. In this
> process we change the
> algorithm to load the guard variable with an atomic load that has ACQUIRE
> semantics. I'm not
Hi Paul,
thanks for the answers. I did not want to be nasty, but was just wondering, if
I only I had those problems. Given furthermore, that reviews are sparse lately,
I thought it might help, when a glitch was removed before a reviewer put his
head into it :-)
I am curious though, why we loose m
Hi,
GDB currently searches for /usr/bin/ARCH-OS-gcc and chooses one but one cannot
override which one. GDB would provide new option 'set compile-gcc'.
Jan
include/ChangeLog
2015-05-24 Jan Kratochvil
* gcc-interface.h (enum gcc_base_api_version): Update comment for
GCC_FE_V
Hi,
GDB currently searches for /usr/bin/ARCH-OS-gcc and chooses one but it does not
display which one. It cannot, GCC method set_arguments() does not yet know
whether 'set debug compile' is enabled or not.
Jan
include/ChangeLog
2015-05-24 Jan Kratochvil
* gcc-interface.h (enum gcc
Hi,
the libcc1 API change formerly approved for GCC was rejected by GDB, therefore
here is a new API + its implementation.
Jan
include/ChangeLog
2015-05-24 Jan Kratochvil
* gcc-interface.h (enum gcc_base_api_version): Add GCC_FE_VERSION_1.
libcc1/ChangeLog
2015-05-24 Jan Kratochv
Hi,
already approved, maybe it could be already checked in outside of the series:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01298.html
With the patches so far after
(gdb) set debug compile 1
one would get:
searching for compiler matching regex
^(x86_64|i.86)(-[^-]*)?-
Hi all!
The attached vim script can be used to highlight syntax in GIMPLE dumps
making them somewhat easier to read.
I would like to add this script to gcc/contrib directory. Is that OK?
--
Regards,
Mikhail Maltsev
" Syntax highlighting rules for GIMPLE dump files
"
" Copyright (C) 2015 Fre
Combined builds has been broken for about 10 months, because some
binutils configure.in files were renamed to configure.ac, but gcc's
references to them were not updated. There is a corresponding patch
submitted to binutils-gdb, which renames its few remaining configure.in
files to configure.ac.
This is a pretty obvious patch. We were permitting a scoped enum initializer of
an another enum to silently decay to int. That's not right, only unscoped enums
have that privilege.
committed.
nathan
2015-05-24 Nathan Sidwell
cp/
PR c++/66243
* decl.c (build_enumerator): Don't silently
Richard,
here is next patch of the series. It adds all the logic for defining type
equivalence that globs all complete types together in order to make incomplete
type equivalent to every complete variant.
Effect of recursing on pointers
===
This is, of course, intende
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 08:45:23AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Thanks. Did you see improvements around return as well, or mostly /
> only related to the function start?
The rlwinm vs. rldicl change was in dwarf2out.c add_ranges_num for r3
one insn before a blr. I'm sure that was due to no
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 6:54 AM
> >
> > - if (!can_move_invariant_reg (loop, inv, reg))
> > + if (!can_move_invariant_reg (loop, inv, dest))
> Won't this run into into the same problem if DEST is a SUBREG?
One of the very first test in can
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:26:35AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> looking at gcc/*.o I haven't yet seen any regressions in code quality.)
Well that didn't last very long. There are regressions, and just from
looking at disassembled object files it would appear to be frame
pointer related. So the sim
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener [mailto:rguent...@suse.de]
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 1:06 PM
> To: Jeff Law
> Cc: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jakub Jelinek; Alan
> Modra; David Edelsohn; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797
> Subject: Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/va
Ping!
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
Behalf Of Kumar, Venkataramanan
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 9:07 PM
To: James Greenhalgh (james.greenha...@arm.com); gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Kyrill Tkachov (kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com);
24 matches
Mail list logo