Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
Hi,
any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany to
GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)?
[...]
Any new on the subject? Should we go on an start moving?
Cheers,
Colomban
___
Geany-devel
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
Hi,
any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany to
GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)?
[...]
Any new on the subject? Should we go on an start moving?
Yeah, I'd say let's go!
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:06 +0200
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
Hi,
any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany
to GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)?
Le 13/06/2011 18:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:06 +0200
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
Hi,
any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:38:23 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 13/06/2011 18:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:06 +0200
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
Hi,
any
Le 13/06/2011 19:45, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:38:23 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 13/06/2011 18:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:06 +0200
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 04/05/2011
Le 08/05/2011 17:47, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Wed, 4 May 2011 23:40:17 +0200, Jiří wrote:
[...]
Porting to GTK 3 is pretty straightforward but it really depends how
many GTK2-specific things Geany uses. I can have a look at it once a
GTK3-compatible Scintilla is used by Geany.
I'm
Le 08/05/2011 17:50, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Thu, 05 May 2011 00:40:43 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Also, it would make it easier to migrate to using Glade 3 with
GtkBuilder instead of Glade 2
Well, not completely sure about this, even though I like GtkBuilder and
Glade3 (it's s nicer
On Thu, 5 May 2011 13:55:58 +0200, Jiří wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 00:44, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 04/05/2011 23:40, Jiří Techet a écrit :
[...] Last time I was using Glade 2 I had to
modify some system header files because Glade was using some
obsolete
On Wed, 4 May 2011 23:40:17 +0200, Jiří wrote:
2. Compile a newer version of GTK themselves. This is what I do at
work on SLES 9 (which ships with GTK 2.4). Basically you have to
compile pkgconfig, freetype, fontconfig, glib, pixman, cairo, pango,
atk and finally gtk. About 3 hours of work (of
On Thu, 05 May 2011 00:40:43 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Also, it would make it easier to migrate to using Glade 3 with
GtkBuilder instead of Glade 2
Well, not completely sure about this, even though I like GtkBuilder and
Glade3 (it's s nicer than Glade2 :p): GtkBuilder was *introduced*
in
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 00:44, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 04/05/2011 23:40, Jiří Techet a écrit :
[...] Last time I was using Glade 2 I had to
modify some system header files because Glade was using some obsolete
interfaces that apparently nobody else used/tested.
Hi,
any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany to
GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)?
This would make quite some code obsolete and so could be removed.
Also, it would make it easier to migrate to using Glade 3 with
GtkBuilder instead of Glade 2 (and in the long term makes getting
2011/5/4 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
Hi,
any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany to
GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)?
This would make quite some code obsolete and so could be removed.
Also, it would make it easier to migrate to using Glade 3 with
GtkBuilder
On 05/04/11 14:00, Enrico Tröger wrote:
Hi,
any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany to
GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)?
This would make quite some code obsolete and so could be removed.
Also, it would make it easier to migrate to using Glade 3 with
GtkBuilder instead of
Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
Hi,
any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany to
GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)?
None from me, more the contrary :)
This would make quite some code obsolete and so could be removed.
Yep, that'd be good.
Also, it would make
Le 04/05/2011 23:40, Jiří Techet a écrit :
[...] Last time I was using Glade 2 I had to
modify some system header files because Glade was using some obsolete
interfaces that apparently nobody else used/tested.
That's not completely true, the fix can be done in Glade2 code rather
than GTK
17 matches
Mail list logo
