Re: gEDA-user: how to add a rat to a via?

2007-12-07 Thread Steve Meier
ahhh a rat in my mind is a potential trace between two points of a netlist. If you want to draw a trace that isn't part of the netlist then a rat has no meaning. at least in my mind. Steve M. Lope De Vega wrote: Check me if I am wrong... you have a pin that isn't part of a net and you are

Re: gEDA-user: how to add a rat to a via?

2007-12-07 Thread Dave N6NZ
Lope De Vega wrote: Hello, I've got a chip on my layout. In gscheme I didn't bind some of it's pins, though I'd like to, once in pcb, add a via and connect the pin to it, How do you use to do this? Are you trying to add break out pads so that you can get to the pins in a prototyping

gEDA-user: ElementArc

2007-12-07 Thread Ian Chapman
Hi, I am making a base for a toroid transformer and I am using an element footprint as the basis for the design. I have used a spread sheet to calculate the mounting holes base on 120 degree spacing. I have three arcs between the tabs to define the outline between the tabs. Using

Re: gEDA-user: updating your OS, was: Re: Export gerber crash

2007-12-07 Thread Ian Chapman
Hi Peter and many thanks. This partial upgrade stuff, not too sure but I sent your e-mail, closed all windows and found the last widow telling me to click okay to finish the download. It took about 2.5 hours at 70kB/s and now I have a new PCB. I will start a new thread from work as I think I

Re: gEDA-user: updating your OS, was: Re: Export gerber crash

2007-12-07 Thread Peter Clifton
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 22:28 -0500, Ian Chapman wrote: After this, try the upgrade again. Oh no. support for gnome cups manager has ended. I'll sort out the printer if necessary. Other than that and a few not supported libs that I do not understand it seems to be okay. Upgrades available

Re: gEDA-user: how to add a rat to a via?

2007-12-07 Thread Peter Clifton
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 00:01 -0800, Steve Meier wrote: ahhh a rat in my mind is a potential trace between two points of a netlist. If you want to draw a trace that isn't part of the netlist then a rat has no meaning. at least in my mind. You can actually build a rats-nest in PCB, in very

Re: gEDA-user: Subscribing to this list

2007-12-07 Thread alan
And when I tried to modify my subscription from receiving individual emails to receiving a daily digest, the instructions at http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user were not as clear as they could have been about how to do that. The page claims that it allows me to "change your

Re: gEDA-user: [pcb] first board docs

2007-12-07 Thread John Luciani
On Dec 7, 2007 1:27 AM, DJ Delorie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Third: 555 SMT blinky. Same thing, but mostly SMT, with a ground plane on the back. This introduces SMT, vias, and thermals. I'm thinking of something that uses two chips, like a USB to RS232 converter, so I can put stuff on

Re: gEDA-user: PCAD to GEDA (GSCHEM)

2007-12-07 Thread Steven Ball
I was doing some digging today, and look what I found: http://www.cedcc.psu.edu/cadtools/pcaddoc/pdif.pdf Documentation on the format of the PDIF output from PCAD. Hope it is helpful. See also: http://www.cedcc.psu.edu/cadtools/interfaces.html -Steve On Nov 28, 2007, at 6:43 PM, Steve

Re: gEDA-user: Subscribing to this list

2007-12-07 Thread Ian Chapman
Hi Alan, a copy of my original post has been sent to Ales Hvezda. I guess he is a busy guy and looking after us and other groups is not his day job. Regards Ian. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 7:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; gEDA

Re: gEDA-user: uEDA .. was .. Re: Heavy Symbols and such

2007-12-07 Thread John Griessen
Steve Meier wrote: John Doty wrote: The interesting idea so far in this discussion has been to let the BOM be source rather than product. Dang, That was the idea I intentionally left out of my last diatribe. And you cut right to it. I agree, that the world being bom specific as

Re: gEDA-user: uEDA .. was .. Re: Heavy Symbols and such

2007-12-07 Thread John Griessen
al davis wrote: On Thursday 06 December 2007, Steve Meier wrote: Steve also said this in private mail (I hope you don't mind my repeating it in public): I actually think that one of the rather remarkable things about geda is the use of a macro language to generate the output.

Re: gEDA-user: ElementArc

2007-12-07 Thread Ian Chapman
Sorry DJ, I was using PCB version ... This is PCB, an interactive printed circuit board editor version 20070208 Compiled on Jul 20 2007 at 19:19:50 This was newly updated together with the newest Ubuntu on an AMD64. ... Then File / load element data / click to footprint

Re: gEDA-user: [pcb] first board docs

2007-12-07 Thread DJ Delorie
I think your original idea was pretty good. It seems like a natural progression for learning PCB layout or evaluating the tool. Yeah, you're probably right. I can put the more complex board in the user's guide, too. ___ geda-user mailing list

Re: gEDA-user: Heavy Symbols and such

2007-12-07 Thread Peter TB Brett
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 21:40:49 Dave N6NZ wrote: Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:11:35 -0800, Steve Meier wrote: I tend to create symbols that have a predefined foot print and then only override it at the schemtic level when I need to. Me too. Me three. I'd be

Re: gEDA-user: Heavy Symbols and such

2007-12-07 Thread Peter TB Brett
On Thursday 06 December 2007 00:02:11 Peter Clifton wrote: On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 12:43 -0800, Ben Jackson wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:11:35AM -0800, Steve Meier wrote: One way you can do this today is to at the schematic level add a footprint attribute to each symbol as you place

Re: gEDA-user: uEDA .. was .. Re: Heavy Symbols and such

2007-12-07 Thread John Doty
On Dec 8, 2007, at 4:25 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote: On Friday 07 December 2007 23:52:05 John Doty wrote: Right now, we, by default, reference light symbols in a common library, and then attach attributes to them. That's wrong, too: if I'm going to use a bunch of, say, OP220's in a design, I

Re: gEDA-user: uEDA .. was .. Re: Heavy Symbols and such

2007-12-07 Thread Peter TB Brett
On Friday 07 December 2007 23:52:05 John Doty wrote: Right now, we, by default, reference light symbols in a common library, and then attach attributes to them. That's wrong, too: if I'm going to use a bunch of, say, OP220's in a design, I want all of them to have the same package and

Re: gEDA-user: uEDA .. was .. Re: Heavy Symbols and such

2007-12-07 Thread Steven Michalske
think of tables of tables, i have a resistor table that has all of my companies resistors, hell even the reel number for the pick and place machine i am using, and my schematic page is linked to a table it reads that table and sees that you have resistor known as abc123 it points to the

Re: gEDA-user: uEDA .. was .. Re: Heavy Symbols and such

2007-12-07 Thread DJ Delorie
Hey, a thought... What if gattrib could accept a *.bom on the command line in addition to the *.sch ? We'd have to color code the cells to say which attributes go to the schematics and which to the bom, and figure out the logistics, but it might fit what we're trying to accomplish.

Re: gEDA-user: PCAD to GEDA (GSCHEM)

2007-12-07 Thread Steve Meier
Looks like it has the relevent info. Steve Meier On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 11:15 -0700, Steven Ball wrote: I was doing some digging today, and look what I found: http://www.cedcc.psu.edu/cadtools/pcaddoc/pdif.pdf Documentation on the format of the PDIF output from PCAD. Hope it is

Re: gEDA-user: how to add a rat to a via?

2007-12-07 Thread DJ Delorie
I've got a chip on my layout. In gscheme I didn't bind some of it's pins, though I'd like to, once in pcb, add a via and connect the pin to it, How do you use to do this? In pcb, I can add rat lines from such a chip's pins to existing layout components but if I create a via and try to link

Re: gEDA-user: ElementArc

2007-12-07 Thread DJ Delorie
version 20070208 That's old. We might have fixed it since then. This was newly updated together with the newest Ubuntu on an AMD64. I'm guessing it was the GTK gui, and not the Lesstif one, then? Although, it works OK for gtk also, for me.

Re: gEDA-user: ElementArc

2007-12-07 Thread DJ Delorie
They both look fine to me, but you didn't say which GUI or exporter you're seeing the erratic behavior in. Some graphics libraries, like X, act funny when you give them out-of-range angles like that, so we've been fixing them as we encounter them.

Re: gEDA-user: uEDA .. was .. Re: Heavy Symbols and such

2007-12-07 Thread DJ Delorie
I'm not advocating making a relational database part of the required geda tool set No reason it couldn't be, either. We can hide all that in gattrib and the netlisters. No reason not to support multiple BOM files in gattrib either; just like we support multiple SCH files already.

Re: gEDA-user: uEDA .. was .. Re: Heavy Symbols and such

2007-12-07 Thread Ben Jackson
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 06:24:00PM -0800, Dave N6NZ wrote: In the geda world, I think this makes just as much sense. The above 5 column table would work perfectly fine in mySQL or pick your favorite database. I don't want to get bogged down in the whole argument, but I will point out that

Re: gEDA-user: uEDA .. was .. Re: Heavy Symbols and such

2007-12-07 Thread Dave N6NZ
This problem was solved in the last millennium, and the tools have been written. It's called a relational database. You can't do a CPU design project involving hundreds of engineers with a schematic system that doesn't scale. In the last century I worked on several CPU's where the schematics,

Re: gEDA-user: ElementArc

2007-12-07 Thread Ian Chapman
Thanks again Peter, This is what I am about to start using. This is PCB, an interactive printed circuit board editor version 20070912 PCB homepage: http://pcb.sf.net gEDA homepage: http://www.geda.seul.org gEDA Wiki: http://geda.seul.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=geda - Compile Time

Re: gEDA-user: uEDA .. was .. Re: Heavy Symbols and such

2007-12-07 Thread John Doty
On Dec 7, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Steve Meier wrote: John Doty wrote: The interesting idea so far in this discussion has been to let the BOM be source rather than product. Dang, That was the idea I intentionally left out of my last diatribe. And you cut right to it. I agree, that the world

Re: gEDA-user: ElementArc

2007-12-07 Thread DJ Delorie
I do not see lessif in synaptic package manager. It's not about what's installed, it's about how pcb was built. If it has a bunch of layer buttons along the left side, you're using the gtk hid. If it doesn't, you're using the lesstif hid. pcb_20070912.orig.tar.gz. Even that's a few months

Re: gEDA-user: Problem with OGD1: Can anyone advise on good low-jitter

2007-12-07 Thread Dan McMahill
Timothy Normand Miller wrote: Sorry about the cross-post. We're -- THIS close to getting OGD1 done, with artwork in the hands of board makers who are working on quotes, and we've discovered a problem that could make the video output unacceptable. We've discovered that the clock generators

gEDA-user: [pcb] Terminology section done

2007-12-07 Thread DJ Delorie
http://www.delorie.com/pcb/docs/gs/ If you find any weirdisms, let me know. ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Re: gEDA-user: uEDA .. was .. Re: Heavy Symbols and such

2007-12-07 Thread Dave N6NZ
DJ Delorie wrote: I'm not advocating making a relational database part of the required geda tool set No reason it couldn't be, either. We can hide all that in gattrib and the netlisters. I should mention one little gotcha... hierarchy always throws in a few kinks, since a database table

Re: gEDA-user: ElementArc

2007-12-07 Thread Dan McMahill
DJ Delorie wrote: I do not see lessif in synaptic package manager. It's not about what's installed, it's about how pcb was built. If it has a bunch of layer buttons along the left side, you're using the gtk hid. If it doesn't, you're using the lesstif hid. also the about dialog box

Re: gEDA-user: ElementArc

2007-12-07 Thread Ian Chapman
Okay, I am okay I did the tarball thing and it worked out fine. My base looks the way I intended too. Many thanks for all of your encouragement regards Ian. On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 14:10 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: version 20070208 That's old. We might have fixed it since then. This

Re: gEDA-user: ElementArc

2007-12-07 Thread Peter Clifton
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:11 -0500, Ian Chapman wrote: Okay, I am okay I did the tarball thing and it worked out fine. My base looks the way I intended too. Many thanks for all of your encouragement regards Ian. Now you're on Gutsy, the .deb packages I built for use in the Engineering

gEDA-user: New system log from my crashed fedora

2007-12-07 Thread Robert Butts
Here is the latest message file the fedora forum people suggested I get. See attached rc.sysinit Description: Binary data ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Re: gEDA-user: ElementArc

2007-12-07 Thread Ian Chapman
I have gtk2-engines 1.2.12.2-Oubuntu1 gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.12.0-lubunt3 gtk2-engines-ubuntulooks 0.9.12.8 I do not see lessif in synaptic package manager. I can see but not installed lessif2 1.0.95.0-2.1 plus a dev, bin and doc I guess I am a bit lost as to how it works without gtk 2.4 min.