ok,
So if I have correctly understood, the symbol provided with gEDA are
designed to do PCB, not simulation.
In case of simulation, it's simpler to have symbol with all pins (power
included), in to order to netlist correctly.
I will check with a custom symbol with power pin and I reply to you
photorealistic comes to mind, paintings painted to look like
photographs.
2 detailed visual representation, like that obtained in a photograph,
in anonphotographic medium such as animation or computer graphics.
:-)
On Aug 16, 2008, at 10:04 PM, Ben Jackson wrote
Tried to send this to
I'm trying to run a very simple schematic thru gsch2pcb and it's getting
stuck. The printout says: using the m4 processor for pcb footprints
Then just sits there. The footprints I'm using are TO-18 AND DO-35. Aside
from that it's just a thru hole definition. Any ideas?
I'm trying to run a very simple schematic thru gsch2pcb and it's getting
stuck. The printout says: using the m4 processor for pcb footprints
Are you using newlib (file type) or M4 footprints? I rename the directory
for the M4 stuff and only use newlib footprints that I create.
Does gsch2pcb
I think the problem is in the footprints. For to TO-18 I wrote TO-18 and
I'm thinking gsch2pcb is getting stuck there.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to run a very simple schematic thru gsch2pcb and it's getting
stuck. The printout says: using the m4
I seem to recall that M4 gets stuck on footprint names with a - in
them. Try TO18 or TO_18.
Stuart
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008, Robert Butts wrote:
I think the problem is in the footprints. For to TO-18 I wrote TO-18 and
I'm thinking gsch2pcb is getting stuck there.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:25
I'm all set. I just got them from gedasymbols.org
Thanks
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Stuart Brorson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to recall that M4 gets stuck on footprint names with a - in
them. Try TO18 or TO_18.
Stuart
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008, Robert Butts wrote:
I think the
On Sunday 17 August 2008 06:34:11 pm Robert Butts wrote:
I think the problem is in the footprints. For to TO-18 I wrote TO-18 and
I'm thinking gsch2pcb is getting stuck there.
I don't recall the details but M4 doesn't always take well to hyphens,
it maybe trying to subtract 18 from TO.
--
Hello,
I'm trying to do a layout in PCB with components that extend over the
edge of the board. This allows them to be mounted flush through a thick
face plate.
The only way that I can lay them out is if board size includes this
extra length. Is there some way of telling PCB to let me
The only way that I can lay them out is if board size includes this
extra length. Is there some way of telling PCB to let me place a
component partially overhanging the edge of the board?
Make the board size bigger. Rename one of your copper layers
outline and draw the real board outline
Hello,
I'm trying to do a layout in PCB with components that extend over the
edge of the board.
Andy,
Not sure if you are making your own footprints for these overhanging parts
or not ... but one solution is to make footprints that index up to the
edge of the board ... with some
11 matches
Mail list logo
