Also, I'm getting the following error on running the command:
build/X86/gem5.opt configs/example/gem5_library/x86-parsec-benchmarks.py
--benchmark vips --size simsmall
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(3,0)
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.19.83
Hi,
I've realised though I'm not sure this may work as intended. Do the
> checkpoints gem5 generates include a memory dump of instructions loaded
> from a binary as well as stack/heap working data too? I'm intending for all
> instructions to be loaded out of the binary I pass on checkpoint
Hi Jason,
it seems like this is exactly what I was looking for.
Awesome to hear that things will get more user friendly in next versions.
Best
Derek
Am 14.06.23 um 20:05 schrieb Jason Lowe-Power via gem5-users:
Hi all,
You can use python multiprocessing with gem5. See
Hi all,
You can use python multiprocessing with gem5. See
https://github.com/gem5/gem5/tree/develop/src/python/gem5/utils/multiprocessing
for details.
So, in theory, you can create scripts such that you can run `./gem5 run.py`
which will run a set of different experiments. You could potentially
On 6/14/2023 11:30 AM, Derek Christ wrote:
Hello Eliot Moss, [one ell please]
a shared Python file with parameter settings sounds useful.
What I meant with running gem5 without the gem5 executable was to use the
compiled library directly from the Python configuration script.
From
Hi everyone,
Is it possible in any way to run the provided x86-parsec-benchmarks.py
script for a system with >3GB of memory? Is there any other way around this
like running the fs.py script for parsec benchmarks?
Thanks,
Vincent
___
gem5-users mailing
Hello Elliot Moss,
a shared Python file with parameter settings sounds useful.
What I meant with running gem5 without the gem5 executable was to use
the compiled library directly from the Python configuration script.
From what I have seen, the gem5 executable sets up some internal state
and
On 6/14/2023 2:32 AM, Derek Christ via gem5-users wrote:
Hello,
maybe I have missed something in the official docs, but I'm not sure how to run multiple simulations
with different parameters concurrently to speed up the process.
What I have done is I created a Python script that sets
Hi Ayaz,
thanks for your quick response.
Yeah, argparse is one possibility. But it is cumbersome and bugprone to
implement a new option for every single configuration parameter I want
to vary. Also, I would need a way not only to parse the options, but
also to generate the gem5 command with
I'm generating checkpoints from spec for a research project. I have a use case
where I'm introducing novel instructions but they only have OoO core semantics
rather than program semantics, and any binary I modify to include them has the
exact same addresses for functions, basic blocks etc as an
Hi Derek,
I am not sure if I have understood your question correctly, but the gem5
interface is basically a Python run script in which you can add parameters
as well (that can be set from the command line or in shell scripts). For
example, you can look at the following link to see how `argparse`
Hello,
maybe I have missed something in the official docs, but I'm not sure how
to run multiple simulations with different parameters concurrently to
speed up the process.
What I have done is I created a Python script that sets environment
variables and then kicks-off gem5 which in turn
12 matches
Mail list logo
