[Gen-art] Re: GenART review of draft-ietf-pana-framework-06.txt

Yoshihiro Ohba wrote: > Hi David, > > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:31:36PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Ohba-san, >> >> Thank you for your response. I have a few comments: >> >> 1) The Informational vs. Standards-track RFC issue is for the ADs >> to decide. >> > > OK. > Please dis

[Gen-art] Re: GenART review of draft-ietf-pana-framework-06.txt

Yoshihiro Ohba wrote: > Hi David, > > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:31:36PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Ohba-san, >> >> Thank you for your response. I have a few comments: >> >> 1) The Informational vs. Standards-track RFC issue is for the ADs >> to decide. >> > > OK. > David is r

[Gen-art] Re: GenART review of draft-ietf-pana-framework-06.txt

Hi David, On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:31:36PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ohba-san, > > Thank you for your response. I have a few comments: > > 1) The Informational vs. Standards-track RFC issue is for the ADs > to decide. OK. > > 2) My comment on IKE is not the same as Bernard Aboba's.

[Gen-art] draft-ietf-mobike-design-08

Tero/Hannes, I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for your draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Draft: http://www.ie

[Gen-art] Suggested additions to review boilerplate

We still see cases where authors are puzzled about what to do in response to Gen-ART reviews. Sometimes they rush to produce a new version, which may be the wrong thing to do for several reasons. I'd like to suggest two variants of the boilerplate for the beginning of reviews: For IETF Last Call

When there are specialist review lists [Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-rushing-s1000d-urn-00.txt]

There seems to be a general point lurking behind this case. There are several types of document we see that automatically get a specialist review - MIBs are the classic case, but URN namespaces are another. Generally, on the specialist part, the IESG trusts the specialists. Gen-ART seems to get i

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-rushing-s1000d-urn-00.txt

Tom, I'm no expert in RFC 3406 practice, but I'm told that the IESG has generally accepted a positive review by the URN-NID list as sufficient indication that the RFC 3406 requirements have been met. There's a subjective element there of course, but the French have a saying about not being "more