I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-12
We should add Thomas Clause (the shepherd) into this thread as well.
(Unfortunately, .all doesn’t reach shepherds if they are not WG chairs, as is
the case sometimes.)
Jari
On 29 Oct 2014, at 20:47, Martin Thomson martin.thom...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 October 2014 03:52, Dearlove,
We recently had a case where a document shepherd did not receive a review,
because he didn’t happen to be one of the WG chairs.
Gen-ART reviewers tend to send their reviews to draft-foo.all address. Shepherd
names are available in the tracker, but we do not normally dig them up..
because
I am looking at this draft in order to fill in my recommendations for tonight’s
IESG telechat.
Ben, thank you for your review which pointed out worries (and I agreed with
those), and thank you Kevin for the responses (which made sense to me).
However, in addition to the major/minor issue
Thanks for the review, Roni.
Jari
On 06 May 2014, at 08:52, Roni Even ron.even@gmail.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments
Thanks for the review, Tom. Was there an answer to the questions or edits?
Jari
On 03 Oct 2014, at 04:12, Tom Taylor tom.taylor.s...@gmail.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
Thanks for the review, Vijay. Authors/shepherds, do you have any responses to
Vijay’s question below?
Jari
On 29 Oct 2014, at 22:15, Vijay K. Gurbani v...@bell-labs.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-08.txt
Thanks for your review, Alexey. (I was just searching for the review two
minutes ago, when this came in :-)
Jari
On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:05, Alexey Melnikov alexey.melni...@isode.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
On 30 Oct 2014, at 09:24, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@piuha.net wrote:
We should add Thomas Clause (the shepherd) into this thread as well.
Fabulous, thank you Jari. I will read up on this, try to understand the
proxy-DISCUSS raised by Adrian.
(Unfortunately, .all doesn’t reach shepherds if
On 30 Oct 2014, at 12:02, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@piuha.net wrote:
Thanks for the review, Vijay. Authors/shepherds, do you have any responses to
Vijay’s question below?
Jari
On 29 Oct 2014, at 22:15, Vijay K. Gurbani v...@bell-labs.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this
Thanks.
On 27 Oct 2014, at 21:44, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document
Thanks.
On 20 Oct 2014, at 16:12, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) droma...@avaya.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any
On 10/30/2014 04:29 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
Thanks for the review, Tom. Was there an answer to the questions or
edits?
Jari: I have not got back to Tom regarding the edits yet as I was
waiting for IESG review to be done. I was planning to then attend
to both the Gen-ART and IESG comments on the
This is probably my fault. I didn't think it was wise to submit a
new version of the I-D until all of the comments corrections had
been collected. I didn't want folks trying to review a moving target,
especially since a change in paragraph A might affect the interpretation
of paragraph B.
Thanks for your review(s) Elwyn! Much appreciated. (Authors, have you seen the
remaining nits list below?)
Jari
On 14 Oct 2014, at 22:26, Elwyn Davies elw...@dial.pipex.com wrote:
Hi, Anthony.
These changes look good. I have run through all the changes in -08 and there
are (IMO) a
On 10/30/2014 07:15 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote:
Right. However, we wanted to make sure that there is no assumption
on the number of concurrent RTP flows. There are scenarios where
you will have no concurrent flow, scenarios where you have some,
but they are inactive, and also scenarios where you
Robert - thank you very much for the review. And thanks David for taking the
suggestions into account.
I have balloted no-objection for this draft in today’s IESG telechat.
Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Thanks for the review, Suresh. Authors, can you take Suresh’s comments into
account? Thanks.
Jari
On 29 Oct 2014, at 06:11, Suresh Krishnan suresh.krish...@ericsson.com wrote:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART,
Thanks for the review(s), Robert.
Jari
On 14 Oct 2014, at 19:44, Robert Sparks rjspa...@nostrum.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for
Ok. Thanks.
Jari
On 30 Oct 2014, at 14:31, Vijay K. Gurbani v...@bell-labs.com wrote:
On 10/30/2014 04:29 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
Thanks for the review, Tom. Was there an answer to the questions or
edits?
Jari: I have not got back to Tom regarding the edits yet as I was
waiting for IESG
Kevin:
This is probably my fault. I didn't think it was wise to submit a
new version of the I-D until all of the comments corrections had
been collected. I didn't want folks trying to review a moving target,
especially since a change in paragraph A might affect the interpretation
of
Thanks for your review, Suresh. Authors, can you take care of the address issue
below?
Jari
On 29 Oct 2014, at 05:31, Suresh Krishnan suresh.krish...@ericsson.com wrote:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please
Christer:
Many thanks for your review. Much appreciated.
Thank you Scott for addressing things that Christer brought up. I do agree with
you though that detailed treatment of WHOIS is out of scope for this document.
Jari
On 21 Oct 2014, at 18:56, Christer Holmberg
Thanks for your review, Joel!
Jari
On 19 Oct 2014, at 05:22, Joel M. Halpern j...@joelhalpern.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these
Thanks for the review and edits, Ben Ning!
Jari
On 23 Oct 2014, at 11:59, Ning Kong nk...@cnnic.cn wrote:
-- section 4.3, table:
What do slashes and parentheses mean in the data? Are they literally in the
data, or do they mean something else?
In the domain space, all characters in
Thanks for the review, Christer, and thanks Remi for volunteering to address
these.
jari
On 06 Oct 2014, at 13:40, Christer Holmberg christer.holmb...@ericsson.com
wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@piuha.net wrote:
We recently had a case where a document shepherd did not receive a review,
because he didn’t happen to be one of the WG chairs.
Gen-ART reviewers tend to send their reviews to draft-foo.all address.
Shepherd names are
Add shepherds to .all
+1, --David
From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Scott Brim
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 9:49 AM
To: Jari Arkko
Cc: General Area Review Team
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] .all and non-wg-chair shepherds
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Jari Arkko
Robert, can you confirm that we do not currently have shepherds on .all? I’m
getting some conflicting data about this, and I’m too busy today to figure out
a test case to actually try this out.
Jari
On 30 Oct 2014, at 15:48, Scott Brim scott.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:54
(resending in the clear - I’ve had some PGP/SMIME trouble today.)
Thanks for the review, Suresh. Authors, can you take Suresh’s comments into
account? Thanks.
Jari
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
No, they aren't typically at the moment, but they should be added soon
(during next week if things go right).
For those on genart that haven't found it already, you can check what
the alias expands to at the moment
for any given draft by looking at
http://tools.ietf.org/draft/aliases
(and a
Great. Thank you.
Jari
On 30 Oct 2014, at 16:23, Robert Sparks rjspa...@nostrum.com wrote:
No, they aren't typically at the moment, but they should be added soon
(during next week if things go right).
For those on genart that haven't found it already, you can check what the
alias
Nothing so far.
Tom
On 30/10/2014 5:29 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
Thanks for the review, Tom. Was there an answer to the questions or edits?
Jari
On 03 Oct 2014, at 04:12, Tom Taylor tom.taylor.s...@gmail.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART,
Do you need pseudo-code for Newton's Method, to see how it works. My
experience was that 3-4 iterations would get convergence.
Tom
On 30/10/2014 8:31 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
On 10/30/2014 04:29 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
Thanks for the review, Tom. Was there an answer to the questions or
On 10/30/2014 10:57 AM, Tom Taylor wrote:
Do you need pseudo-code for Newton's Method, to see how it works. My
experience was that 3-4 iterations would get convergence.
Tom: Thanks. I will take a look at the URL you provided. The code
should be easy.
I will get back to you.
Cheers,
-
Hi Suresh, Jari,
I am traveling this week and fully engaged in other activities. We plan to
address comments next week.
Thanks,
Acee
On 10/30/14, 3:58 AM, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@piuha.net wrote:
Thanks for your review, Suresh.
I agree that the two issues from Section 2 should be fixed.
Hi Suresh -
Thanks for the comments. I have updated the draft accordingly.
/himanshu
-Original Message-
From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:suresh.krish...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 12:11 AM
To: draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls@tools.ietf.org; General Area Review Team
Subject:
Hi all,
The following reviewers have assignments:
Reviewer LC end Draft
-
Francis Dupont2014-11-06 draft-ietf-opsawg-mibs-to-ieee80231-01
Joel Halpern 2014-11-10
It doesn't affect me this time, but I am a bit surprised to see
several last calls ending very close to and during the IETF week.
I thought there was a policy of avoiding that (e.g. by extending such
last calls).
Regards
Brian
On 31/10/2014 09:58, A. Jean Mahoney wrote:
Hi all,
The
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
41 matches
Mail list logo
