Re: [Gen-art] [Extra] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly-06

Hi Elwyn, On 08/03/2024 17:35, Elwyn Davies via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Elwyn Davies Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the

Re: [Gen-art] [Extra] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-messagelimit-08

Hi Russ, Thank you for your review. On 08/03/2024 16:29, Russ Housley via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Russ Housley Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IET

Re: [Gen-art] [Extra] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-quota-06

Hi Linda, Thank you for your review. On 14/09/2021 05:46, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG f

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-smime-07

Hi Peter, Thank you for your review. On 07/09/2021 08:00, Peter Yee via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Peter Yee Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for t

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-24

On 14/01/2021 22:11, Barry Leiba wrote: Thanks for the review, Robert -- I know this one was heavy to lift, and I particularly appreciate the time and effort. And the same from me: thank you very much! Barry On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 5:09 PM Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Rob

Re: [Gen-art] [Acme] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-email-smime-08

Hi Peter, Thank you for your detailed review. My answers/comments are below: On 09/07/2020 09:21, Peter Yee via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Peter Yee Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF doc

Re: [Gen-art] Fwd: CALL to revoke last call: Re: [tsvwg] Request for working group feedback on draft-kuehlewind-system-ports (6th March, 2020)

Hi Joe, I discussed this document with TSV ADs and here is what is going to happen next: 1) IETF LC on this document will run to the end (i.e. will not be cancelled), so that we can collect more information from people about what they want and don't want IESG to do. This includes comments from

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-14

Hi Robert, Thank you for your review and my apologies for slow response: On 06/12/2019 16:05, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Not Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documen

Re: [Gen-art] [Extra] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-replace-01

Hi all, On 24/10/2018 11:55, Alissa Cooper wrote: Robert, thanks for your review. I flagged it in my ballot since there has been no response. I entered a No Objection ballot. Actually, this change has an error and should instead be: uid =/ "UID" SP replace Best Regards, Alexey On Oct 12,

Re: [Gen-art] [taugh.com-standards] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-12

Hi John, On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 8:38 PM, John R. Levine wrote: > > Pete, thanks for your review. I think the whole point of chartering DCRUP > > was to produce documents such as this. > > John, thanks for updating to reference RFC 8174, although I agree with Adam > > that the boilerplate shoul

Re: [Gen-art] draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06 and RFCs 5536 & 5322

Hi Paul, > On 19 Sep 2017, at 21:02, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > >> On 9/19/17 2:41 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: >> On 19 Sep 2017, at 9:23, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >>optional-field =/ *( approved / >>archive / >>

Re: [Gen-art] draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06 and RFCs 5536 & 5322

Hi Paul, On Tue, Sep 19, 2017, at 03:00 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > Hi Alexey, > > On 9/19/17 5:42 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > >> I'm on tap to do the genart telechat review on &

Re: [Gen-art] draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06 and RFCs 5536 & 5322

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017, at 10:42 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > I'm on tap to do the genart telechat review on > > draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06. I see that nothing has been done > > ab

Re: [Gen-art] draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06 and RFCs 5536 & 5322

Hi Paul, On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > I'm on tap to do the genart telechat review on > draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06. I see that nothing has been done > about the ABNF that was my primary concern in my prior wglc review of > -05: > > https://mailarchive.ietf.

Re: [Gen-art] draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06 and RFCs 5536 & 5322

Paul, On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > I'm on tap to do the genart telechat review on > draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06. I see that nothing has been done > about the ABNF that was my primary concern in my prior wglc review of > -05: > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-spinosa-urn-lex-11

Hi Paul, I am not an author, but let me disagree with one of your reported issues: > On 14 Sep 2017, at 16:45, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > (2) MAJOR: Name or query? > > A URN is by definition a *name*. Some parts of this document do focus on the > lex URN as a name. But the document also proposes

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-wilde-json-seq-suffix-02

Hi Peter, > On 10 Dec 2016, at 19:32, Peter Yee wrote: > > Reviewer: Peter Yee > Review result: Ready with Nits > > This draft is looking better than the first two. It's in line with > the other structured syntax suffix drafts. The only comment I have > is: > > Page 4, IANA Considerations, C

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14

xt should > not only cover the technical changes (syntax etc), but also if there > are changes regarding the usage etc. I think this is fair. I will let the editor come up with some proposal. Best Regards, Alexey > Regards, > > Christer > > > *From: *Alexey Mel

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14

Hi Christer, Thank you for your comments. On Tue, Nov 29, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > > Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-pal-eidr-urn-2016-01

Hi, On 05/07/2016 18:25, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote: Hi Vijay, I will appreciate if the "including 'urn:eidr:'" part made it into the draft. Ok. BTW, should I plan on creating a new I-D before the scheduled telechat, or after? You can post a new version any time. Before the telechat would

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-calext-extensions-03 (was: RE: Assignments for the 2016-06-30 Telechat)

On 29/06/2016 14:44, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: Hi, There was no update to this document since my previous review. My original review raised two issues - one was clarified by explanations from Alexey (thanks!); the other is about the document status (should it be marked as 'Updates RFC 5545

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-calext-extensions-03

Hi Dan, Thank you for your review. On 21/06/2016 12:48, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like an

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04

Hi Roni, On 30/03/2016 15:21, Roni Even wrote: Hi, Adding Alissa to the thread We had a similar issue with draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-srtp . The result was to downgrade from Standard to Informational. This required to go back to the WG. I also noted that there is some text in section one that l

[Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-threats-14

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-lisp-threats-14 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2016/01/17 IETF LC End Date: 2016/01/15 IESG Telechat date: 2016/01/21 Summary: Ready. This is a well written document and I enjoyed read

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-14

Hi Karen, On 05/01/2016 10:42, Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen wrote: HI, Please find some feedback below. BR, Karen *From:*Alexey Melnikov [mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com <mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com>] *Sent:* 4. januar 2016 11:48 *To:* Yoshifumi Nishida <ma

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-14

Hi Yoshi, On 02/01/2016 23:03, Yoshifumi Nishida wrote: Hi Alexey, On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Alexey Melnikov mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com>> wrote: Hi Yoshi, On 2 Jan 2016, at 09:20, Yoshifumi Nishida mailto:nish...@sfc.wide.ad.jp>> wrote: Hi Alexey,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-14

Hi Yoshi, > On 2 Jan 2016, at 09:20, Yoshifumi Nishida wrote: > > Hi Alexey, > > Thanks for the comments. > >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Alexey Melnikov >> wrote: >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >&

Re: [Gen-art] [imapext] FW: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-07

Hi Jay, On 29/12/2015 00:10, Jayantheesh S B wrote: Thanks Peter. Addressed you comments in the attached version. The changes look good to me. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-14

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-14 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-12-23 IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-23 IESG Telechat date: (if known) N/A Summary: Ready with a couple of minor points that need

Re: [Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14

Hi Ralph, On 16/12/2015 16:19, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote: On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:47 AM 12/16/15, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Hi Ralph, Thank you for your review. Sorry I missed it earlier. You're welcome. Looks like we have agreement on my editorial comments and suggestions. Will the

Re: [Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14

Hi Ralph, Thank you for your review. Sorry I missed it earlier. On 09/12/2015 20:47, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote: Nits/editorial comments: Nicely written, very clear document. Thank you. idnits reports some lines too long and an unused reference. I fixed the reference in my copy. I hope RFC Ed

Re: [Gen-art] Genart Telechat review draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19

I deleted an incorrect recipient in my original review. Sorry about that. > On 15 Dec 2015, at 11:19, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IE

[Gen-art] Genart Telechat review draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-12-15 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: 2015-12-17 Summary: Nearly ready for publication as Proposed Standard I thin

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc-05

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc-05 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-12-10 IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-04 IESG Telechat date: 2015-12-17 Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC. Although I

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-08

ity-08.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-06-25 IETF LC End Date: 2015-06-18 IESG Telechat date: 2015-06-25 Summary: Ready with nits. Major issues: None Minor issues: In Section 3.3 - did you mean R5 when talking about P5? I've searched multiple times and couldn't find i

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-oauth-spop-11

that is no reason to do more work for less security. I hope that helps explain the logic. This is fine, but I wish you've said that in the document! This was not clear. Regards John B. On Jun 11, 2015, at 5:57 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Hi John, On 11/06/2015 13:51, John Bradley wrot

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-oauth-spop-11

Hi John, On 11/06/2015 13:51, John Bradley wrote: I believe that the other comments were all-ready addressed in draft 12 as a result of Ben Laurie’s comments from last week. If Alexey can double check that I got everything that would be great. I re-worked those sections to capture Ben’s comm

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-oauth-spop-11

On 09/06/2015 13:13, Barry Leiba wrote: Major Concerns: What is the justification for having the "plain" verifier? If one is intercepted by a malicious application, your extension becomes pointless. Yes, this is what my DISCUSS is about. I'm glad to have support for that view. Very much so. I

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-oauth-spop-11

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. This review is in response to a request for early Gen-ART review. Document: draft-ietf-oauth-spop-11 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management-04

f-bmwg-traffic-management-04 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 27 May 2015 IETF LC End Date: 20 April 2015 IESG Telechat date: 28 May 2015 Summary: Ready with nits. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: HTTP, SMTP, FTP, etc. deserve Informational references the

[Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth-06

uth-06.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-05-10 IETF LC End Date: 2015-05-04 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution-10

draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution-10.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-05-10 IETF LC End Date: 2015-04-08 IESG Telechat date: N/A My apologies for the late review of this document. Summary: Ready with nits Minor (but some of these might be more serious): In 6.2.2: If an implementation

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution-10

idr-ls-distribution-10.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-05-10 IETF LC End Date: 2015-04-08 IESG Telechat date: N/A My apologies for the late review of this document. Summary: Ready with nits Minor (but some of these might be more serious): In 6.2.2: If an implementation of BGP-LS det

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15

Hi Robert, On 21/04/2015 21:21, Robert Sparks wrote: Nit: The introduction calls out email addresses as an example of the kinds of strings these methods are not intended for use in preparing (along with LDAP distinguished names). But in the body of the document, email addresses (or strings t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART IESG Telechat re-review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-04

My earlier Gen-Art review comments were addressed, so the document is now ready for publication. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sacm-use-cases-09

cm-use-cases-09 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-04-08 IETF LC End Date: 2015-03-16 IESG Telechat date: 2015-04-09 Summary: Ready Major Concerns: None Minor Concerns: None Nits: In Section 2.1.1: >* Guidance that specifies how old collected data can be to be >

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601bis-04.txt

tf-pim-rfc4601bis-04.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015/03/11 IESG Telechat date: 2015/03/12 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Internet Standard RFC. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-02

Hi Tom, On 16/02/2015 17:55, Thomas Haynes wrote: On Feb 16, 2015, at 3:17 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Hi Tom, On 11/02/2015 21:14, Tom Haynes wrote: Hi Alex, Thanks for the review. Comments inline. Tom On Feb 11, 2015, at 3:51 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: [snip] In Section 5: Label

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-02

Hi Tom, On 11/02/2015 21:14, Tom Haynes wrote: Hi Alex, Thanks for the review. Comments inline. Tom On Feb 11, 2015, at 3:51 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/a

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-11

ion-11 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-02-11 IETF LC End Date: 2015-02-04 IESG Telechat date: 2015-03-05 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Thank you for writing this document, I quite enjoyed reading it. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial co

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-02

try-02 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-02-11 IETF LC End Date: 2015-02-16 IESG Telechat date: N/A. Summary: This draft is nearly ready for publication as a standard track RFC (with nits). Major issues: Minor issues: In Section 4: "LSF" is used for the first time without b

[Gen-art] GenART review of draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-05

policy-considerations-05 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-01-08 IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-01 IESG Telechat date: 2015-01-08 Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard (with nits) Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits: In various sections: first references to: Netconf, SSH, TL

[Gen-art] GenART review of draft-iab-iana-principles-02

viewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-01-04 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: Ready for publication as IAB Informational document. Major/minor/nits: none ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listin

[Gen-art] GenART review of draft-ietf-pcp-server-selection-07

ion-07 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-01-04 IETF LC End Date: 2015-01-07 IESG Telechat date: 2015-01-22 Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard. Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits: none ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ie

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-08.txt

08.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 30 October 2014 IETF LC End Date: 24 October 2014 IESG Telechat date: 30 October 2014 Summary: Ready (with nits) Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: On page 6 the first reference to UTF-8 needs a Normative Ref

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-srtp-07.txt

07.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 1 October 2014 IETF LC End Date: 11 September 2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: Ready with nits Major issues: none Minor issues: I would like to understand how a document registering ARIA ciphers can have an Informative (and not a Normative) refere

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty-03.txt

03.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 1 October 2014 IETF LC End Date: 7 October 2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: Ready Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits/editorial comments: none (I didn't check the math, but it looke

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05

On 04/08/2014 18:16, Donald Eastlake wrote: Hi Alexey, Hi Donald, On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

[Gen-art] LC review of draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05.txt

nts-05 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 3-Aug-2014 IETF LC End Date: 13-Aug-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC [ready with comments] Major issues: None Minor issues: In Section 1: RMCAT is not explained/expanded, when mention

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05

lay-05 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 3 August 2014 IETF LC End Date: 21 July 2014 IESG Telechat date: 7 August 2014 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC. [Ready with nits] Major issues: None Minor issues: Section 6.4: who allocated opcodes? I.e. is there a re

[Gen-art] LC review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-pmsi-registry-03.txt

try-03 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 3-Aug-2014 IETF LC End Date: 9-Aug-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: None ___ G

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06

viewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 9 July 2014 IETF LC End Date: 1 July 2014 IESG Telechat date: 10 July 2014 This document is ready as an Informational. This is a fine document, I feel much wiser for it :-). My only comment is about use of a downref to a draft. Basically I agree with Barry

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-17

number version comes along, and those implementations handle other version numbers, while being able to downgrade to 0... Jari On 26 May 2014, at 10:47, Alexey Melnikov mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com>> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For ba

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-p2psip-self-tuning-12

p2psip-self-tuning-12 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2014-06-11 IETF LC End Date: 2014-06-11 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standard Track RFC. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ie

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-17

ast-17 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: May 26, 2014 IETF LC End Date: May 26, 2014 Summary: Nearly ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Major issues: In the document, I am seeing: 5.1.1.1. Version (V) [And in several other similar sections] The protocol version number fo

Re: [Gen-art] [salud] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-12 and also Area Director's review

Hi Dale, > On 7 May 2014, at 16:55, wor...@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) wrote: > > [as an author] > >> From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" >> 13. User Agent Behaviour The User Agent (UA) MUST produce a reasonable rendering regardless of the combination of URIs (of any scheme

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-12 and also Area Director's review

Hi Dale, > On 6 May 2014, at 19:53, wor...@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) wrote: > > 2014-04-28 14:59 GMT+02:00 Alexey Melnikov : >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> >> <htt

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-12

rns-12.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 27 April 2014 IETF LC End Date: 25 April 2014 IESG Telechat date: (if known) N/A Summary: Ready with nits/questions. Major issues: None Minor issues: 13. User Agent Behaviour The User Agent (UA) MUST produce a reasonable rendering regardl

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-cdni-framework-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-cdni-framework-10. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Summary: This draft is read

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-melnikov-smime-msa-to-mda-03

On 25/02/2014 15:57, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Docu

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-09

Lear [mailto:l...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 8:01 AM To: Black, David; Alexey Melnikov (alexey.melni...@isode.com); dcridl...@arcode.com; General Area Review Team (gen-art@ietf.org) Cc: Barry Leiba (barryle...@computer.org);i...@ietf.org;imap...@ietf.org Subject: Re: Gen-ART revie

Re: [Gen-art] [imapext] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-09

On 27 Jan 2014, at 20:59, Barry Leiba wrote: >> Actually, I think I convinced Barry that it is updating RFC 2683. > > Yes: because the new line-length-limit recommendation is meant to > apply whether or not condstore or qresync are in play, this "updates" > remains (it's the others that used to

Re: [Gen-art] [imapext] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-09

Hi Eliot, Mostly agreeing with you, but some corrections below: On 27/01/2014 13:00, Eliot Lear wrote: Hi Dave, First, thank you for your review. I personally appreciate to the time you put in to all of your reviews. On 1/27/14, 3:06 AM, Black, David wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc6326bis-01

Hi Donald, On 20/01/2014 16:45, Donald Eastlake wrote: Hi Alexey, Thanks for your review, see below: On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16

On 17/09/2013 17:15, Andrew Allen wrote: Alexy Thank you for the review. My responses below prepended with [AA] Andrew -Original Message- From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 6:56 AM To: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc6326bis-01

bis-01 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2014-01-20 IETF LC End Date: 2014-01-22 IESG Telechat date: 2014-01-23 Summary: This draft is nearly ready for publication as a standard track RFC. Major issues: None Minor issues: o Label: This carries the fine-grained label identifier f

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-savi-send-10

viewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2014-01-06 IETF LC End Date: 2013-12-23 IESG Telechat date: 2014-01-09 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a standard track RFC. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: There were a couple of minor editorial issues like an

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mile-sci-11

On 17/10/2013 14:40, Alexey Melnikov wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may r

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-turner-ct-keypackage-receipt-n-error-algs-03

eipt-n-error-algs-03 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 4 November 2013 IETF LC End Date: 27 November 2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits: none _

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-05

eqt-05 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 4 November 2013 IETF LC End Date: 18 November 2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational document. Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits/editorial comments

Re: [Gen-art] Call for volunteers: httpbis document set

On 21/10/2013 18:34, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: Hi all, The following httpbis documents are in Last Call: * draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging (82 pages) * draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics (98 pages) * draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional (27 pages) * draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range (24 pages) * dra

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-mile-sci-09

viewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2013-10-16 IETF LC End Date: 2013-10-22 Summary: This draft is nearly ready for publication as a Standard Track document. Major issues: I have a couple of IANA related questions/comments about this document. I hope they would be easy to address.

[Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-ecrit-unauthenticated-access-07.txt

icated-access-07.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 3 October 2013 IETF LC End Date: 27 September 2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: Ready with nits Major issues: None Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: In Section 1: the acronym VSP is not defined. (It is defined in a later section.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3316bis-04

bis-03 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 10 September 2013 IETF LC End Date: 2 September 2013 IESG Telechat date: 12 September 2013 Summary: Ready. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits: None ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ie

[Gen-art] Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-resnick-retire-std1-01

retire-std1-01 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 8 September 2013 IETF LC End Date: 1 October 2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a BCP RFC. Major/Minor/Nits: none ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3316bis-03

bis-03 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 30 August 2013 IETF LC End Date: 2 September 2013 IESG Telechat date: 12 September 2013 Summary: Ready with nits. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits: In 1.1 This document complements the IPv6 node requirements [RFC6434] in places where clarific

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16

urn-16 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2013-08-08 IETF LC End Date: 2013-08-16 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational document (with nits). Major issues: -- None Minor issues: In 3.1: Rules for Lexical Equivalence: Two GSMA IMEI URNs are equivalent i

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-07

Sorry for the confusion with my earlier email, I corrected the subject for my review. On 06/06/2013 11:05, Alexey Melnikov wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArt

[Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-ropt-07.txt

opt-07.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 16 July 2013 IETF LC End Date: 3 July 2013 IESG Telechat date: 18 July 2013 Summary: Ready for publication as an Experimental RFC with some nits Major issues: None Minor issues: In 5.1.2: Dynamic IP Multicast Selector Mode Flag: This

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-forces-interop-08

-gmpls-aps-req-07 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2013-06-06 IETF LC End Date: 2013-06-07 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC. Major issues: None. Minor issues: None. Nits/editorial comments: I might have missed that, but I

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-mib-07

On 03/05/2013 19:29, Ulrich Herberg wrote: Alexey, thank you very much for your review. Please see my reply below: On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <h

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Document: draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud-06 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 03 May 2013 IETF LC End Date: 9 May 201

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-mib-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Document: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-mib-07 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 03 May 2013 IETF LC End Date: 23 April 201

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-09

rblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-09 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2013-04-04 IETF LC End Date: 2013-03-15 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: Ready Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits/editorial comments: none ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ie

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-cs-17

On 28/02/2013 07:31, simo.veikkolai...@nokia.com wrote: Hello Alexey, Hi Simo, Thank you for the response. Thank you for the review. Please find my answers inline [SV]. -Original Message- From: ext Alexey Melnikov [mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com] Sent: 12. helmikuuta 2013 15:20 To

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-cs-17

-cs-17 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2013-02-12 IETF LC End Date: 2013-02-01 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standard Track RFC (with some nits/minor issues): Major issues: Minor issues: 5.2.2. Media Descriptions When "RTP/AVP" is us

[Gen-art] Gen-ART (telechat) review of draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-18

option-18 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2013-02-07 IETF LC End Date: 2013-02-07 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Major issues: None Minor issues: In Section 1: the first reference to URI needs a Normative ref

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-15

On 04/02/2013 19:01, Russ Housley wrote: Alexey: I have not seen a reply to this review. Are your concerns resolved in the current version? Sorry, missed that earlier: half of them were resolved. I post an updated review. ___ Gen-art mailing list

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-dpa-etal-00

tf-idr-deprecate-dpa-etal-00 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2013-01-14 IETF LC End Date: 2013-01-24 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Nits/Comments: none. I've checked the IANA registry and this draft seems to

Re: [Gen-art] Mail regarding draft-ietf-sidr-usecases

Hi Sriram, On 10/01/2013 21:45, Sriram, Kotikalapudi wrote: Updated/revised -06 version is attached, and also a diff file (-05 vs. -06 versions). I have not uploaded this new (-06) version to the IETF ID submissions page yet. I will as soon I am advised to do so. I think uploading this version

  1   2   3   >