Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Hi,
I realized the question on obsoleting RFC 8110 (Q_2_1) is already discussed,
so no reason for a separate thread because of my review.
Regards,
Christer
> -Original Message-
> From: Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
> Sent: Thursday, 8 August 2024 13.12
> To: gen-art@i
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
t in the pceps draft seems to be
aligned. I guess people are aware of the security risks with early data, so no
further justification is needed :)
So, I am fine with the current text, and withdraw my minor issue Q1.
Regards,
Christer
>> On Dec 8, 2023, at 6:51 AM, Christer Holmberg via
behind the
MUST NOT?
Regards,
Christer
> On Dec 8, 2023, at 6:51 AM, Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART)
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Message-----
From: Gen-art On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
Sent: Monday, 22 May 2023 10.48
To: Mark Nottingham
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; HTTP APIs Working Group ; Last Call
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of
draft-ietf-httpapi-link-template-02
Hi Mark,
>>> Ah. The reason i
Hi Mark,
>>> Ah. The reason is that allowing any type would require creating a
>>> mapping of current values to SF types, and there are just too many
>>> potential (and undocumented) values already in use to do this.
>>
>> I don't think that is true. Just because the Parameter syntax allows
>> val
Hi Mark,
Q2_2: The text says "Parameter values MUST be Strings."
It is unclear what "Strings" means. Does it mean that parameter
values must be encoded as quoted-strings? If so, why? RFC8288 says
that parameter values can be encoded both as token and quoted-string.
>>>
>>>
Hi Mark,
Please see inline.
>> Q2_1: There is no ABNF for the header field. There are examples using
>> both quotes ("/{username}") and angle brackets
>> (), so please include the ABNF.
>
> This is a Structured Field; in the HTTP community, we've agreed that
> documenting them with ABNF is not g
Hi,
In Q2_4, I note that the URIs have been replaced by fireeye URIs... Anyway, I
assume the reader will know which example in the draft I am referring to :)
Regards,
Christer
-Original Message-
From: last-call On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
via Datatracker
Sent: Tuesday, 16 May
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Hi,
QMa1: General
As the document defines a new error code, and define new
WWW-Authenticate parameters, should the document not be an Update to
RFC 6750?
>>> It's a good point to consider. Our rationale is that this document
>>> leverages
>>> many different e
Hi,
>Thanks Christer for your thorough review!
>A new draft
>(https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-12.html)
>
>reflecting changes resulting from the feedback has been published.
>Comments inline
>
Major issues:
>> QMa1: General
>>
>>As the document defin
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Hi,
Thank You for addressing my comments! :)
Regards
Christer
From: Daniel Migault
Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2022 20.27
To: Christer Holmberg
Cc: gen-art >> General area reviewing team ;
draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation@ietf.org; homenet
;
er that give some examples on how they work. I am sure
call flows would make things easier to understand.
Regards,
Christer
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 6:19 AM Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
mailto:nore...@ietf.org> > wrote:
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready w
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
ferences https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/PR-webrtc-20201215/. I just want
to verify that there is no text etc in 8829bis that is not aligned with
20210126.
Regards,
Christer
> On Mar 29, 2022, at 6:39 AM, Christer Holmberg
> <mailto:christer.holmberg=40ericsson@dmarc.ietf.org>
Hi,
Thanks for addressing my comments, and for explaining the reason for
Experimental :)
Regards,
Christer
-Original Message-
From: Luigi Iannone
Sent: tiistai 12. huhtikuuta 2022 10.14
To: Christer Holmberg
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf@ietf.org;
last-c
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Hi,
A couple of comments:
First, in general, if we are going to update the reference version, we need to
verify that we don't break anything.
Second, most of the RTCWEB RFCs referencing the WebRTC spec seem to reference
*without* a version (i.e., https://www.w3.org/TR/webrtc/). Many RFCs also
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
ks in the same format as used in HTTP the Link header field,
>and the other as a JSON object.
>
>by:
>
>One serializes links in the same format as used in HTTP the Link header field,
>and the other serializes links in JSON.
Looks good.
Regards,
Christer
On Tue, Jan 11,
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Hi,
I have removed the issues where I am ok, with no further comments, with the
reply you gave :)
>One interesting side note I have from reading the review is:
>The CoRE WG, which produced this specification, is probably best known for
>maintaining the CoAP protocol, but it also has some other
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Hi Nagendra,
Thank You for addressing my issues! I am happy with the outcome, and have no
further issues.
Regards,
Christer
From: Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
Sent: tiistai 31. elokuuta 2021 23.22
To: Christer Holmberg ; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint
Thank You, Ines!
Regards,
Christer
-Original Message-
From: Ines Robles via Datatracker
Sent: maanantai 9. elokuuta 2021 21.34
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org;
mmu...@ietf.org
Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
, 2021, at 10:36 AM, Christer Holmberg
mailto:christer.holmberg=40ericsson@dmarc.ietf.org>>
wrote:
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi John,
>> Q1: As far as I understand, the document only defines a new BGP OPEN Optional
>> Parameter Type, but does not modify/add
Hi John,
>> Q1: As far as I understand, the document only defines a new BGP OPEN Optional
>> Parameter Type, but does not modify/add procedures in RFC 4271. So, is the
>> document really an update to RFC 4271? And, when reading RFC 5429, I cannot
>> find any text saying that new parameter types wo
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Thank You, Alissa!
Regards,
Christer
-Original Message-
From: Alissa Cooper
Sent: torstai 13. elokuuta 2020 3.51
To: Brian E Carpenter
Cc: Christer Holmberg ; gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org;
mmu...@ietf.org
Subject: Re
Will do. Thanks!
Regards,
Christer
From: Murray S. Kucherawy
Sent: torstai 16. heinäkuuta 2020 18.51
To: Christer Holmberg
Cc: Brian E Carpenter ; gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org;
mmu...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last
e document obsoletes RFC5549, I would personally include the complete
registration text in this document - even if it is just copy/paste from RFC5549.
Regards,
Christer
-Original Message-
From: Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
Sent: vendredi 10 juillet 2020 00:17
To: gen-art@ietf.or
Sent: maanantai 13. heinäkuuta 2020 23.52
To: Christer Holmberg ; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org;
mmu...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of
draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-21
Thanks Christer, that all looks
Hi Brian,
Thank You for the review! Please see inline.
Nits:
-
>> 4.1. MSRP URI
>>
>> transport /= "dc"
>>
>> I see that RFC7977 takes a slightly different approach to updating the ABNF:
>>
>> transport = "tcp" / "ws" / 1*ALPHANUM
>>
> The advantage of listing out
>
> tran
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
b7-ac0b-4eba-bc4b-55c0e7f8a2b9&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fboucadair%2Ffilter-control%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2FChrister's%20Review.pdf
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Christer Holmberg via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> Envoyé : samedi 6 juin 2020 11:27 À :
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Hi,
The PR looks good to me! Thanks for addressing my issues! :)
Regards,
Christer
From: Yoav Weiss
Date: Thursday, 7 May 2020 at 13.02
To: Christer Holmberg
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" , "last-c...@ietf.org"
, HTTP Group ,
"draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints@ietf.o
Hi Yoav,
>> I have not received the pull request yet, so I will comment only based on
>> your e-mail reply :)
>
> Apologies for the delay. PR is now up at
> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=0a42e34e-54e25920-0a42a3d5-
> 869a14f4b08c-11c3f32cbd74f2f2&q=1&e=978d85da-fab3-4523-a8d9-447aa6bdf05
Hi Yoav,
I have not received the pull request yet, so I will comment only based on your
e-mail reply :)
In general, I am happy with your explanations, and for most parts I think some
text giving the explanations in the draft would be useful.
---
Major issues:
MaQ1:
>> Section 2.1. descr
Hi,
Seems like I did a copy/paste error. Please skip Q3-Q6, the issues/questions
will come later in the review.
Regards,
Christer
On 02/05/2020, 1.44, "last-call on behalf of Christer Holmberg via
Datatracker" wrote:
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready w
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
er functions as described in the DetNet
Architecture.
Thanks
Bala'zs
-Original Message-
From: Christer Holmberg
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 11:19 PM
To: Balázs Varga A ; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: last-c...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-detnet-
Hi Bala'zs,
Thank you for the reply and clarifications. I still have a question on Q2.
...
Q2:
>> The first line of the 2nd paragraph of the Introduction says:
>>
>> “This document describes the concepts needed by any DetNet data plane
specification…”
>>
>> What
Hi Linda,
Thank You for the review! Please see inline.
>Section 1.4.1: the first paragraph is very confusing. The steps after the
>figure is much clear on what to be done. It is better to delete the the
>sub-phrase "... where the registrar informs the UAC about the
> authorization ..
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
confuses me.
T140 is ONLY for real-time text. There is no "T140 audio" or "T140 video".
Regards,
Christer
Linda
From: Christer Holmberg
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 4:02 PM
To: Linda Dunbar ; Gunnar Hellström
; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: last-c...@ietf.org; mmu...@ietf
Hi Linda,
>Gunnar,
I am not Gunnar, but I will reply :)
>Thank you very much for the explanation.
>
>Do you mean WebRTC data channel is used as Transport mechanism for real-time
>text, >but Audio and Video of T140 still use RTP or SRTP?
I am not sure what you mean by "Audio and Video of T140"
Hi Linda,
Thank You for the review!
I think Gunnar has already answered your question. I have nothing to add, but I
send this reply to indicate that I have ready your review :)
Regards,
Christer
From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
Sent: Friday, February 14,
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before
Hi Valery,
>> Q1:
>>
>> The Security Considerations lists IKEv2/IPSec algorithms that are not
>> considered quantum-resistant. However, that is not mentioned anywhere
else. I
>> think it would be good to mention that in the Abstract and/or
Introduction.
>
> Introduct
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
pull%2F50>)
> and will be incorporated into a new
>version of the document that addresses both your comments and those by Yaron
>Sheffer.
Looks good.
Regards,
Christer
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:29 PM Christer Holmberg
mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com>> wrote:
Hi,
>
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Hi,
>Some answers to your questions inline. I'm not sure further changes along the
>lines suggested here are needed, but I'm open to arguments that point in that
>direction.
I am mostly fine with your answers. Just a couple of comments inline still.
---
MIN_2:
Can the mechanism be used
Hi Nick,
Thanks for your reply! Please see inline.
>>MIN_1:
>>The last sentence of Section 1 says that the mechanism requires TLS version
>>1.2
>>or later. Would it be useful to state that in a dedicated Applicability
>>section?
>
> I'm disinclined to include an applicability section considerin
Hi,
My gen-art issues have been properly addressed.
Thanks!
Regards,
Christer
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Mark D. Baushke
Lähetetty: maanantai 26. elokuuta 2019 22.08
Vastaanottaja: Christer Holmberg
Kopio: gen-art@ietf.org; cur...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-curdle
Hi Mark,
Section 1:
---
>> Q1_1:
>>
...elided...
>>> RFC5656 covers three specific constructions:
>>>
>>> a) Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH),>
>>> b) Elliptic Curve Menezes-Qu-Vanstone (ECMQV) key agreement, and
>>> c) Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA).
>>>
>>
Hi Mark,
Please see inline. I have removed the comments where your suggested solution is
fine and I have nothing further to say.
Nits/editorial comments:
General:
-
QGEN_1:
>> - The document uses “as discussed in”, “as defined in”, “as described”
>> in terminology. It might be justifi
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Hi,
…
>> Example: pn-prid = 00fc13adff78512
>>
>> For more information about the APNs Topic and device token:
>>
>> SB> Is the following part of the example? If so it could usefully be
>> delimited
>> SB> as such, otherwise, I don't understand why it is not a normal document
>> SB> reference
Hi,
Based on the gen-art comments from Stewart, I have created a pull request for
the suggested changes.
https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-sip-push/pull/31
Regards,
Christer
From: Christer Holmberg
Date: Thursday, 20 December 2018 at 17.37
To: Stewart Bryant , "gen-art@ietf.org"
Hi Stewart,
Thank You for the review! Please see inline.
>Summary: A well written document with some minor points that could use a little
>attention.
>
>Major issues: None
>
>Minor issues:
>
>In Figure 1 the following is included:
>
> REGISTER sip:al...@example.com SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Hi Tommy,
Please see inline.
Minor issues:
Q1:
>> Section 3.1 contains some SHOULD-do statements, e.g.,:
>>
>> "the initiator SHOULD also include one or more INTERNAL_IP4_DNS and
>> INTERNAL_IP6_DNS attributes in the CFG_REQUEST"
>>
>> "the initiator SHOULD also include one or more INTERNAL_DN
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Hi Juergen,
It seems like I missed your reply earlier. Sorry for that. See inline.
>> Minor issues:
>>
>> Sometimes, when a draft updates an existing RFC, people ask whether
>> implementations not implementing the draft are still compliant with the
>> updated
>> RFC. Based on discussions, the c
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
1:19, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>>> On 7. Jun 2018, at 02:43, Christer
>>>Holmberg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>>> Not a comment on the document, but a question/suggestion:
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want to hav
1 - 100 of 366 matches
Mail list logo