tpapi/deprecation-header/commit/a32eb7f65cddd8a4dc6ff1899814ae3756710e66
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header/blob/main/draft-ietf-httpapi-deprecation-header.md
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 1:25 PM Robert Sparks
wrote:
Thanks - its going in the right direction I think.
Please look
l mark this issue resolved. We will publish
the draft once we have addressed comments we may receive from other
reviewers.
regards,
sanjay
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 9:34 AM Robert Sparks
wrote:
Thanks Sanjay -
I think there's still some tension to resolve on who has age
5 and we
have addressed those. Draft 08 published today
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-deprecation-header/
incorporates all your comments per our understanding. Let me know if
something is missed.
regards,
sanjay
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 10:21 AM Robert Sparks via
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Thanks for your very quick response Gábor.
Everything below looks fine. Answers to your questions inline.
On 5/22/24 12:25 PM, Gábor LENCSE wrote:
Dear Robert,
Thank you very much for your review and comments. Please see my
answers inline.
2024.05.22. 18:30 keltezéssel, Robert Sparks via
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
On 6/14/23 3:22 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thank you for this review.
Please see my comments on individual issues below.
On 2023-06-13, at 23:59, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
On 5/3/23 1:12 PM, John Scudder wrote:
On May 3, 2023, at 11:04 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
2) Please reconsider the link to the mailarchive in the RFC. Put it in the
shepherd writeup or in the history in the datatracker as a comment (chairs
can
do this). Otherwise it adds to the list
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
can be
seen at: https://tinyurl.com/opsawg-add-latest. This may be tweaked a
little bit for better readability.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : last-call De la part de Robert
Sparks
Envoyé : mardi 21 février 2023 15:49
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ;
gen-art@ietf.org
Cc :
d-dnr-13
<https://www.iana.org/go/draft-ietf-add-dnr-13>]
So both of these options are created by that particular draft which is
becoming an RFC.
See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-add-dnr/13/
- Bernie
On Feb 21, 2023, at 9:49 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
On 2/20/23 12
On 2/20/23 12:42 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Robert Sparks via Datatracker
Envoyé : vendredi 17 février 2023 21:30
À : gen-art@ietf.org
Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypte
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
On 11/30/22 5:53 PM, Brian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 4:08 PM Robert Sparks
wrote:
On 11/30/22 2:39 PM, Brian Campbell wrote:
Thank you for the review Robert. And apologies for the very
delayed response. I think we had a bit of a volunteer's dilemma
&
nd
should be in the -17 revision. Some discussion on the majors is inline
below.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 3:45 PM Robert Sparks
wrote:
I have two major issues that I think need discussion:
Major Issue 1) The document seems to be specifying a new way of
comparing json names, cla
On 11/17/22 4:44 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
Apologies - an upload fumble left -00 empty. I've revised it to have
content at -01.
Which I'll also paste here for convenience:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF
Apologies - an upload fumble left -00 empty. I've revised it to have
content at -01.
RjS
On 11/17/22 4:36 PM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Ge
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
trimming:
On 10/14/22 2:57 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
Robert:
Thanks for the prompt review.
Happy to be able to get it out quickly. Genart is crunched.
Minor Issue:
The document says operators need to not use colliding names but then explicitly
declaires on how an operator would know if a nam
minor tweak
On 10/13/22 4:44 PM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote:
At:
"The mechanism for an operator to determine whether an ASCII string associate
with a NF Type is unique across operators is outside the scope of this document"
I suggest "string associate with" ->
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Please take note of
https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/discussions/3760. If the
change proposed there will cause problems for you, add a comment there,
or reply to tools-disc...@ietf.org to let us know.
RjS
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ie
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 03:42:02PM -0700, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote:
If you have the following configuration (best read in a fixed-width font):
BFRA: p1 -> forward_connected(DNC) BFRC
p2 -> forward_connected(DNC) BFRD
p3 -> local_decap
BFRB: p1 -> forward_connect
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Dan -
I put the assignment back into accepted manually.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 17, 2021, at 3:44 AM, Dan Romascanu wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Due to a system glitch I cannot enter my reviews via the tool. Until this is
> fixed, here are my early comments to draft-ietf-6man-grand, which w
I think Pierce's question was whether _this_ document, once published as
an RFC, obsoletes (and replaces) 8226. It does not. It only updates
8226, as noted on the first page, and in the metadata captured in the
datatracker.
There is not an 8226bis effort underway at this time.
I've set the Re
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: On the Right Track
This is an early genart review of draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs-02.
Comments here should be processed the same as any other feedback given for the
document.
I think I see some conflicts in the requirements that I think would be good to
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
eview them before we
publish an new ID ?
Thank you
Olivier
*From:*Olivier Gimenez
*Sent:* 05 October 2020 11:54
*To:* 'Robert Sparks' ; gen-art@ietf.org
*Cc:* lp-...@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan@ietf.org
*Subject:* RE: Genart last call review
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
next revision.
Thank you!
Jorge
*From: *Robert Sparks via Datatracker
*Date: *Tuesday, August 18, 2020 at 6:11 PM
*To: *gen-art@ietf.org
*Cc: *draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags@ietf.org
, last-c...@ietf.org
, b...@ietf.org
*Subject: *Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-05
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
On 6/11/20 9:12 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
Thanks! Some initial replies inline (I haven't looked at the updated
draft yet, but will do so soon):
I've looked at the diffs between -13 and -15 and my comments have been
addressed except for one point.
Only one of them (i.e
Your comments have been addressed in the updated document
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling/
Best Regards,
Huaimo
*From:* Robert Sparks via Datatracker
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 9, 2020 5:41 P
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
ong".
-- Mike
-Original Message-
From: Id-event On Behalf Of Robert Sparks via
Datatracker
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 11:57 AM
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: last-c...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll@ietf.org;
id-ev...@ietf.org
Subject: [Id
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
I like that and hope it's acceptable to the community.
But it was a very small nit - if it turns out to be problematic, I'm ok
leaving things as they were.
RjS
On 3/17/20 10:26 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
I wanted to avoid "be able to be" and have an explicit actor. I see
the difficulty you point
On 3/17/20 8:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
thanks for review robert,
This sentence slowed me down when reading:
As the origin AS may be modified by outbound policy, policy semantics
based on RPKI Origin Validation state MUST be able to be applied
separately on distribution into BGP an
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Hi Joe -
Thanks for the heads up. I haven't been following this and am just
starting to read the threads on tsvwg, so apologies if my question below
has already been addressed.
On 2/17/20 5:09 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
FYI to the ARTs involved.
Discussion appears to at least be started in TSVW
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
This is a combined genart and secdir last-call review.
Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
Document: draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2020-02-07
IETF LC End Date: 2020-02-12
IESG
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Not Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Hi Martin -
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 26, 2019, at 5:16 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review Robert,
>
>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, at 09:47, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote:
>> Neither the document nor the shepherds write-up acknowledge or expla
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Not Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
on, Oct 28, 2019 at 12:00 PM Robert Sparks via Datatracker
mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> wrote:
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Not Ready
Summary: Not ready for publication as a Proposed Standard
I found this document very difficult to read. On my first past
through,
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Not Ready
Summary: Not ready for publication as a Proposed Standard
I found this document very difficult to read. On my first past through, I was
fairly certain it didn't specify the protocol well enough to actually implement
it, until I got deep int
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
On 7/2/19 4:24 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote:
On Jun 28, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker
wrote:
Issue:
The discussion of recursive resolvers in section 6.1 may need additional
consideration. In particular, the recommendation to pass a received error code
along to a client has, I
inline
On 7/2/19 1:36 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote:
On Jun 28, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker
wrote:
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
ll 2019-04-01
draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07
Robert Sparks Last Call 2019-04-12 draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-13
* Other revision previously reviewed
** This revision already reviewed
Next in the reviewer rotation:
Jari Arkko
Stewart Bryant
Brian Carpenter
El
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Also, the reference to IEEE 754 should probably point to the 2008
version instead of the 1985 version (unless you've got a specific reason
to use the older one?)
RjS
On 2/20/19 2:02 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Not Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART rev
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Not Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Aaron -
To be a bit more clear, my point is to twist the IESGs arm about recent
pushback on WGs publishing requirements documents...
RjS
On 9/6/18 3:22 PM, Aaron Falk wrote:
On 6 Sep 2018, at 16:07, Robert Sparks wrote:
(Repeating one thing from my Last Call review for the benefit of
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
ul review! We just posted
a revision ( -07 ) that, we believe, addresses these comments.
A few answers in line below:
> On 28 Aug 2018, at 23:38, Robert Sparks
mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com>> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Answering your question inline:
On 8/1/18 6:55 PM, William Denniss wrote:
Robert,
Thank you for your valuable feedback. Version 12 incorporates your
feedback. Replies inline:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Robert Sparks <mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com>> wrote:
Reviewer: Robe
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a
As far as I can tell, there has been no response to this. The document
revision just updated a reference to reflect an rfc having been published.
Apologies if I missed a response.
RjS
On 6/11/18 12:20 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
iff?url2=draft-hakala-urn-nbn-rfc3188bis-01.txt
Thanks!
Peter
On 5/1/18 12:35 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
1 - 100 of 376 matches
Mail list logo
