On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 7:38 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/2/1 emijrp emi...@gmail.com
... and I'm thinking about an analysis of male-female biographies ratio
between Wikipedias.
After an analysis of a sample of 364k biographies where ~44% of them where
classified using he/she
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:38 AM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/2/1 emijrp emi...@gmail.com
... and I'm thinking about an analysis of male-female biographies ratio
between Wikipedias.
After an analysis of a sample of 364k biographies where ~44% of them where
classified using he/she
Here is the accumulate by project family
http://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wmcharts/wmchart0013.html Wikiquote,
Wikisource and Wikiversity are the winners.
2012/2/2 John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:05 AM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/2/2 Sarah Stierch
On 2/2/2012 3:03 AM, Caroline Becker wrote:
Don't be depress Sarah if female participation remains low. Even if
Wikipedia was a perfect place without any bias, it would still be a
project from the real world were lot of forces prevent women from
editing : lower confidence in themselves, less
Don't be depress Sarah if female participation remains low. Even if
Wikipedia was a perfect place without any bias, it would still be a project
from the real world were lot of forces prevent women from editing : lower
confidence in themselves, less free time, lower access to education.
We can't
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:05 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, you can't invite 1000 women that a day after leave because they
don't understand how to edit (usability) or other reason. First, you have to
understand why women leave. When you solves that, every woman that arrives,
Thanks Sarah!
Nina
Sendt fra min iPhone
Den 2. feb. 2012 kl. 22:15 skrev Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:05 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, you can't invite 1000 women that a day after leave because they
don't understand how to edit (usability) or other
Hi all;
Is there any up-to-date statistical tools monitoring gender gap? I have
started this basic one[1], and I'm thinking about an analysis of
male-female biographies ratio between Wikipedias.
Suggestions and links to tools are welcome.
Regards,
emijrp
[1]
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:59 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all;
Is there any up-to-date statistical tools monitoring gender gap? I have
started this basic one[1], and I'm thinking about an analysis of male-female
biographies ratio between Wikipedias.
Suggestions and links to tools
On 2/1/12 5:39 PM, Sarah wrote:
That's very interesting, thank you (and somewhat depressing).
Sarah
___
Yeah, it just shows that we need to take action. Imagine if every
Wikimedia contributor on this list, took a few hours and invited a
friend,
2012/2/2 Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com
On 2/1/12 5:39 PM, Sarah wrote:
That's very interesting, thank you (and somewhat depressing).
Sarah
___
Yeah, it just shows that we need to take action.
We need to take action if a low number
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:59 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all;
Is there any up-to-date statistical tools monitoring gender gap? I have
started this basic one[1], and I'm thinking about an analysis of male-female
biographies ratio between Wikipedias.
Suggestions and links to tools
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:59 AM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all;
Is there any up-to-date statistical tools monitoring gender gap? I have
started this basic one[1], and I'm thinking about an analysis of male-female
biographies ratio between Wikipedias.
Suggestions and links to tools
13 matches
Mail list logo
