Re: Kaffe gump run

2005-07-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If Mac OS X means Powerpc, It does. > I would prefer Solaris. Solaris x86 is the only option here. Cheers Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: Kaffe gump run

2005-07-11 Thread Guilhem Lavaux
Hi, If Mac OS X means Powerpc, I would prefer Solaris. Mac OS X supports is still uncertain with the JIT (though we are working on it). Solaris/sparc/x86 should work at 99%. The remaining percent being due to some unimplemented feature like Network card interface detection. Thanks ! Guilhem Lava

Re: Kaffe gump run

2005-07-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to know if there is any chance to get back an automatic > gump run on vmgump.apache.org. There is not that much left to add to what Leo said. If you had the choice of Solaris or MacOS X, which one would you prefer as a

Re: Kaffe gump run

2005-07-11 Thread Leo Simons
Guilhem Lavaux wrote: > Hi, Hi Guilhem! > I am one of the developers of the Kaffe.org VM. I would like to know if > there is any chance to get back an automatic gump run on > vmgump.apache.org. Not really :/. That machine is low on disk space so we can't run any more profiles there. We do have a

Kaffe gump run

2005-07-11 Thread Guilhem Lavaux
Hi, I am one of the developers of the Kaffe.org VM. I would like to know if there is any chance to get back an automatic gump run on vmgump.apache.org. That was pretty useful to test GNU Classpath & Kaffe in interaction with the rest of the other java projects and to detect bugs. Thanks a lot for

Process management (was: Re: Has the Kaffe Gump run died?)

2005-04-27 Thread Leo Simons
On 27-04-2005 00:35, "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Gump3 start is nicer than Gump2's, I agree. Unfortunately I don't was to > give up on Python 2.3 nor Microsoft (non-Cygwin), and the Process Group > stuff is Posix (not even sure if it works on Cygwin). http://effbot.org/downl

Re: Has the Kaffe Gump run died?

2005-04-26 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Hey Leo, thanks for taking a peek @ this... > > Looking at the code, I see no 'setpgid', which is disturbing (to say the > > least). > > Well, there is a setpgrp. That's setpgid(0,0), or something. Sorry, typo, I meant : os.setpgrp(). > > The logic of this kill means the forked child needs to pl

Re: Has the Kaffe Gump run died?

2005-04-26 Thread Leo Simons
On 26-04-2005 22:24, "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This looks 'interesting' : Ooh, then I'd better take a look ;) > Kill process group (anything launched by PID 21107) > Kill process group 18226 (anything launched by PID 21107) [from 21109] > > for: > > pgrpID=os.getpgid(pid) >

Re: Has the Kaffe Gump run died?

2005-04-26 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
gration" code.] regards Adam - Original Message - From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Gump code and data" Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 1:56 PM Subject: Re: Has the Kaffe Gump run died?

Re: Has the Kaffe Gump run died?

2005-04-26 Thread Davanum Srinivas
no luck :( kaffe run still dies. -- dims On 4/26/05, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > oops...i already merged your patch to live :( > > I doubt they are harmful, I just wasn't 100% certain they were sure fixes. > > regards > > Adam > -- Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.a

Re: Has the Kaffe Gump run died?

2005-04-26 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> oops...i already merged your patch to live :( I doubt they are harmful, I just wasn't 100% certain they were sure fixes. regards Adam - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Has the Kaffe Gump run died?

2005-04-26 Thread Davanum Srinivas
oops...i already merged your patch to live :( -- dims On 4/26/05, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > thanks adam. i was looking into the code myself when i saw ur email :) > > will wait for ur patch (both trunk and live...right?) > > Nice to have company in there dims. :-) > > Let'

Re: Has the Kaffe Gump run died?

2005-04-26 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> thanks adam. i was looking into the code myself when i saw ur email :) > will wait for ur patch (both trunk and live...right?) Nice to have company in there dims. :-) Let's do a test run, see if things are working (if we can be certain) and then do a release. http://wiki.apache.org/gump/G

Re: Has the Kaffe Gump run died?

2005-04-26 Thread Davanum Srinivas
thanks adam. i was looking into the code myself when i saw ur email :) will wait for ur patch (both trunk and live...right?) -- dims On 4/26/05, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Could it be that the new "Kill prcess group" stuff is killing too many > > processes, taking the main

Re: Has the Kaffe Gump run died?

2005-04-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think it is the new stuff, per-se, but the fact that some > old slipped in with the new. I was just throwing out random ideas ... > I'll fix it and commit. Great. Please note that I haven't removed the lock file yet. I

Re: Has the Kaffe Gump run died?

2005-04-26 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> Could it be that the new "Kill prcess group" stuff is killing too many > processes, taking the main Gump process down with it? I don't think it is the new stuff, per-se, but the fact that some old slipped in with the new. The old killed "the Gump process" 'cos it was running within a standalone

Has the Kaffe Gump run died?

2005-04-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
I can't seem to find any sign of live of it on Brutus (the only active Gump run seems to be the JDK 1.5 one), gump.lock exists and out.txt ends with , | Failed to build project #[(189, 831)] : [asn1-codec], state:Failed | Build Project: #[(190, 831)] : asn1-der : [state:Unset] | Perform Upda